Jews infiltrate cleverly by breaking a group in half over a policy that half the members support and half do not support, then press the issue often until the group factions. Jews tried it 10 days ago here on voat.xyz forcing a battle over free speech to post porn links that lead to catbox.moe appearing on v/All. It caused upheaval. The jews found something powerful enough to cause massive idiological schism.
This is why the Founders of the United States , though making new african nigger slaves 100% illegal after 1812 (and even 1789)... refused to let the matter of taking the jew slaves away from the south gain traction for debate, and topic was put off until 1860s... They knew it was a 50:50 schism and capable of breaking up a large White nation. The USA Founding Fathers wisely and rightfully knew that heated debate of a healthy group should only involve controversies with 70:30 or 80:20 support... never 50:50. The Jews seek to create 50:50 support controversies.
There are 20 other ways jews break up pro-White groups.
Arguably unrelated but I watched a very similar scenario play out at a church. A lesbian couple, one of whom was a member of the congregation, wanted to get married at a local church. Roughly half supported it an the other was against it. The wedding went ahead. Half the congregation left the church. The girls marriage lasted less than 2 years and they no longer attend the church.
not jews, but same effect : If only 10% wanted something and 90% opposed the 10% would NOT LEAVE GROUP, perhaps a miniscule fraction would leave. But 50:50 arguments cause at least a total breakdown where the enraged are so impassionate from their numbers, that perhaps half quit. The breakdown causes a further effect of others seeing so many quit, and it takes forever to recover.
When jews divide and conquer they do it in waves. First fraction half, then attack the halves or pit them against each other. repeat ... repeat.
jews have other tactics too, mainly changing the agenda of groups, ruining the fun, replacing leadership, causing red tape, bringing shame or controversy onto group by public, spreading rumors, causing paranoia, etc
3-4 man cells max. Related by blood or at least marriage. Keep your activities secret. Fly under the radar. OpSec is critical. No electronic communication.
That might sustain a resistance but seems like a lousy way to get one rolling. A handful of jackasses go to prison and everyone else say fuck that and keeps their heads down.
You want to be honest and that's your grave error.
Recruit on an issue that parallels White interest without saying it's White and you selectively screen entry.
We'd be the full Nazi now if it had been called something else and Hitler's name never evoked.
Hot headed White nationalist boys aren't what you want. They can go rabble rouse on their own and distract attention.
Why not recruit the middle class white men who are dumb as shit by media control and indoctrinate them on White issues they don't know are White?
If you have a room full of White men talking about something like jobs, and one of them talks about nigger jobs, you slowly freeze him out. Pretty soon their issues are White issues as they see it.
Find a nice and polite way to say everything and you can rope them in. It takes patience and you have to swallow a lot of exasperation.
1. Strict rules of conduct, also obeyed by leadership.
2. Distributed systems, but with common goals. Centralized systems are often weak when they are the severe underdog, while distributed cells with a common goal are more hydra-like. This can however create problems with unified action and indeological purity. .
3. Learn from successful societies. This could mean things that the more schizo-leaning types find unsavory, like taking lessons from masons and similar groups. Veiled communication, unwritten rules (is it really a white organition? Or jast an organization entirely of white people?), and generally a level of secrecy that people on the winning side find uncomfortable.
4. Omerta - the group should have an ability to police it's own. The S.S. began as a security force, and the communists had similar approaches. If a faction becomes divisive then action is taken.
Edit: As for blackmail, there's a rason why moral stricture confers real-world strenght. Try not to be blackmailable. This can have a secondary pupose too, as following shared moral rules creates unity and a sense of purpose, reinforcing community.
keep everything above board and dont make it a white organisation, How ever make it a group that would make black people uncomfortable, Historic recreation societies seem like a good idea, you could build a town as a recreation of the 1700s.
If their Europeans all you have to do is poke at their pathological altruism, and point out anything immoral that some are doing, and watch the rest rush to sever all connection to them. No other race has been so devoted to instantly cutting themselves out of their own community as soon as you can’t point at any distasteful fault in it.
Spread everything out yet make it intensely tribalistic so there's a common goal always in place Jews already do this. Have multiple back up plans in case things go wrong . Count on blackmail and infiltration and use it to ones advantage. Record everything. Have spies in select jewed organizations so as to be able to leak things and blackmail and infiltrate them as leverage. Count on things like emotions and group survival to keep things going .
Probably best thing to do is make people prove they are white
Nothing can stop blackmail. Where evidence doest exist it will be created.
Nothing can stop threats beyond possibly a total ignorance of who to threaten. Dont expect that to last under governmental scrutiny or information gathering.
Nothing can stop the group from being infiltrated if you have any intent to expand it. The unreasonable exceptions perhaps being a clone army raised by yourself or an extremely rigid investigation and thorough privacy invasion of all new members. The most reasonable method I can think of is using brain scans as lie detectors. Yes its possible. No it is not cheap nor reasonable despite being the comparatively more reasonable method. I suppose you could use standard lie detectors but what competent infiltrator wouldnt be trained to pass them?
By not featuring a hierarchy. Or by not admitting new members. Could work in tandem. have small groups that each do not admit new members work together in a decentralized way. Now you only have to judge whether to work or not to work with a group. Without any hierarchy, nobody could grab power.
[ + ] ButtToucha9000
[ - ] ButtToucha9000 0 points 2.3 yearsJan 16, 2022 18:22:07 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] 3starAgent
[ - ] 3starAgent [op] 0 points 2.3 yearsJan 16, 2022 18:35:07 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] ButtToucha9000
[ - ] ButtToucha9000 0 points 2.3 yearsJan 16, 2022 03:22:18 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] 3starAgent
[ - ] 3starAgent [op] 1 point 2.3 yearsJan 16, 2022 14:12:33 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] try
[ - ] try 18 points 2.9 yearsJul 3, 2021 15:17:10 ago (+18/-0)*
This is why the Founders of the United States , though making new african nigger slaves 100% illegal after 1812 (and even 1789)... refused to let the matter of taking the jew slaves away from the south gain traction for debate, and topic was put off until 1860s... They knew it was a 50:50 schism and capable of breaking up a large White nation. The USA Founding Fathers wisely and rightfully knew that heated debate of a healthy group should only involve controversies with 70:30 or 80:20 support... never 50:50. The Jews seek to create 50:50 support controversies.
There are 20 other ways jews break up pro-White groups.
Jews are very good at making whites not mobilize.
How Zionists Divide and Conquer:
https://www.bitchute.com/video/YysgntGSDAID/
how communists Divide and Conquer:
https://files.catbox.moe/j1wdum.mp4
DO NOT LET EARLY ARGUMENTS introduced by infiltrating kikes break up your White organization!
NO INTERVIEWS to media! EVER! Only web postings and web videos.
[ + ] GOATMAN
[ - ] GOATMAN 6 points 2.9 yearsJul 3, 2021 19:53:35 ago (+6/-0)
[ + ] try
[ - ] try 4 points 2.9 yearsJul 3, 2021 20:21:06 ago (+4/-0)
When jews divide and conquer they do it in waves. First fraction half, then attack the halves or pit them against each other. repeat ... repeat.
jews have other tactics too, mainly changing the agenda of groups, ruining the fun, replacing leadership, causing red tape, bringing shame or controversy onto group by public, spreading rumors, causing paranoia, etc
[ + ] Garrett
[ - ] Garrett 2 points 2.9 yearsJul 3, 2021 20:33:03 ago (+2/-0)
[ + ] SirNiggsalot
[ - ] SirNiggsalot 6 points 2.9 yearsJul 3, 2021 16:50:58 ago (+6/-0)
3-4 man cells max. Related by blood or at least marriage.
Keep your activities secret. Fly under the radar. OpSec is critical. No electronic communication.
That's really the only way to do it
[ + ] GOATMAN
[ - ] GOATMAN 3 points 2.9 yearsJul 3, 2021 19:55:48 ago (+3/-0)
[ + ] account deleted by user
[ - ] account deleted by user 0 points 2.9 yearsJul 4, 2021 19:47:03 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] yesiknow
[ - ] yesiknow 4 points 2.9 yearsJul 3, 2021 16:38:59 ago (+4/-0)
Recruit on an issue that parallels White interest without saying it's White and you selectively screen entry.
We'd be the full Nazi now if it had been called something else and Hitler's name never evoked.
Hot headed White nationalist boys aren't what you want. They can go rabble rouse on their own and distract attention.
Why not recruit the middle class white men who are dumb as shit by media control and indoctrinate them on White issues they don't know are White?
If you have a room full of White men talking about something like jobs, and one of them talks about nigger jobs, you slowly freeze him out. Pretty soon their issues are White issues as they see it.
Find a nice and polite way to say everything and you can rope them in. It takes patience and you have to swallow a lot of exasperation.
[ + ] taoV
[ - ] taoV 4 points 2.9 yearsJul 3, 2021 15:58:21 ago (+4/-0)
2. Distributed systems, but with common goals. Centralized systems are often weak when they are the severe underdog, while distributed cells with a common goal are more hydra-like. This can however create problems with unified action and indeological purity. .
3. Learn from successful societies. This could mean things that the more schizo-leaning types find unsavory, like taking lessons from masons and similar groups. Veiled communication, unwritten rules (is it really a white organition? Or jast an organization entirely of white people?), and generally a level of secrecy that people on the winning side find uncomfortable.
4. Omerta - the group should have an ability to police it's own. The S.S. began as a security force, and the communists had similar approaches. If a faction becomes divisive then action is taken.
Edit: As for blackmail, there's a rason why moral stricture confers real-world strenght. Try not to be blackmailable. This can have a secondary pupose too, as following shared moral rules creates unity and a sense of purpose, reinforcing community.
[ + ] whostolemyusername
[ - ] whostolemyusername 4 points 2.9 yearsJul 3, 2021 15:35:32 ago (+4/-0)
[ + ] 3Whuurs
[ - ] 3Whuurs 3 points 2.9 yearsJul 3, 2021 22:06:31 ago (+3/-0)
[ + ] Garrett
[ - ] Garrett 3 points 2.9 yearsJul 3, 2021 21:28:11 ago (+3/-0)*
Probably best thing to do is make people prove they are white
And no women allowed
[ + ] oldblo
[ - ] oldblo 3 points 2.9 yearsJul 3, 2021 19:37:46 ago (+3/-0)
Nothing can stop threats beyond possibly a total ignorance of who to threaten. Dont expect that to last under governmental scrutiny or information gathering.
Nothing can stop the group from being infiltrated if you have any intent to expand it. The unreasonable exceptions perhaps being a clone army raised by yourself or an extremely rigid investigation and thorough privacy invasion of all new members. The most reasonable method I can think of is using brain scans as lie detectors. Yes its possible. No it is not cheap nor reasonable despite being the comparatively more reasonable method. I suppose you could use standard lie detectors but what competent infiltrator wouldnt be trained to pass them?
[ + ]deleted
[ - ] deleted 3 points 2.9 yearsJul 3, 2021 16:46:06 ago (+3/-0)
[ + ] bosunmoon
[ - ] bosunmoon 0 points 2.9 yearsJul 5, 2021 15:58:34 ago (+0/-0)
Make no compromise.
Be Honest.
Demand the same of everyone.
If you get confused refer to step one.
[ + ] account deleted by user
[ - ] account deleted by user 0 points 2.9 yearsJul 5, 2021 09:18:58 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] Wahaha
[ - ] Wahaha 2 points 2.9 yearsJul 3, 2021 15:35:17 ago (+2/-0)
[ + ] account deleted by user
[ - ] account deleted by user 1 point 2.9 yearsJul 3, 2021 20:51:53 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] con77
[ - ] con77 1 point 2.9 yearsJul 3, 2021 19:02:57 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] Nosferatjew
[ - ] Nosferatjew 0 points 2.9 yearsJul 4, 2021 03:12:30 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] Tallest_Skil
[ - ] Tallest_Skil 0 points 2.9 yearsJul 3, 2021 16:27:54 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] Lordbananafist
[ - ] Lordbananafist 0 points 2.9 yearsJul 3, 2021 15:51:55 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] TheLastStraightMan
[ - ] TheLastStraightMan 0 points 2.9 yearsJul 3, 2021 15:22:08 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] Oikumene
[ - ] Oikumene -1 points 2.9 yearsJul 3, 2021 19:23:10 ago (+0/-1)
[ + ] SparklingWiggle
[ - ] SparklingWiggle -1 points 2.9 yearsJul 3, 2021 16:36:11 ago (+0/-1)
[ + ] VitaminSieg
[ - ] VitaminSieg 3 points 2.9 yearsJul 3, 2021 21:22:27 ago (+3/-0)
[ + ] Jiggggg
[ - ] Jiggggg 1 point 2.9 yearsJul 4, 2021 07:46:56 ago (+1/-0)