This is one of those subjects that people might ridicule you for entertaining, but I have been researching body doubles / replacements for about ten years and I believe it to be totally true. Once you see it, you really can't unsee it.
Thanks for posting about Miley Cyrus. I have suspected this one myself.
For anyone new to the topic: Here is stuff about Faul McCartney, though at this point I am convinced that there were multiples of all the Beatles, and that they may have been a Tavistock creation from the get-go, so who knows if there ever really was a "real" McCartney. In any case, there are at least two or three. https://digilander.libero.it/jamespaul/fc1.html
If you have anything else, please drop it. I read everything I can.
I have been researching body doubles / replacements for about ten years and I believe it to be totally true.
The Mathis article on Hawking explains that it is a matter of fact, not belief. Hawking had Lou Gehrig's disease, which degenerates your nerves quickly - most don't like past their 20s, and the jitters/twitches it gives you makes you grind your teeth down.
At some point in his 20s, 'Hawking' supposedly gained all of his teeth back (he had like 2 remaining), got his hair back, and had the standard tells (ear shapes) change. Apparently, we are supposed to think he is the only example of a patient with a disease that kills in the 20s that survived to his fucking mid-70s.
Yes, but it is on Hawking radiation and the laws of information transfer around black holes - I excluded due to OT: http://milesmathis.com/hawk2.pdf
Also, the article is right, but there are better arguments against black holes. Stephen Crothers is the most thorough in his debunking - he make a handful of complete proofs, each of which stands on it's own. This is a good place to start: http://www.naturalphilosophy.org/pdf/abstracts/abstracts_5468.pdf
But his work quickly veers off into other fields as blackholes (e.g. planck, thermodynamics) as the mistakes that produced the 'black hole' are the product of problems elsewhere in physics. Bit of a heady subject: http://www.sjcrothers.plasmaresources.com/
Damn, very interesting stuff! I will dig into this for sure, thanks.
Since the topic of Einstein seems relatively similar to this one, I was wondering if you had any good sources or links I could go through regarding the fraud of Einstein. I have seen it mentioned on here time and time again, but some quality sources I could verse myself in would be valuable.
[ - ] out 0 points 2.8 yearsJun 30, 2021 13:50:57 ago (+1/-1)
Interesting. If you guys had to roll out this account to attempt to discredit by using semantics sophistry, there's also something else everyone is missing going on here.
[ + ] Jiggggg
[ - ] Jiggggg 6 points 2.8 yearsJun 30, 2021 12:30:02 ago (+6/-0)
Thanks for posting about Miley Cyrus. I have suspected this one myself.
For anyone new to the topic:
Here is stuff about Faul McCartney, though at this point I am convinced that there were multiples of all the Beatles, and that they may have been a Tavistock creation from the get-go, so who knows if there ever really was a "real" McCartney. In any case, there are at least two or three. https://digilander.libero.it/jamespaul/fc1.html
[ + ] aleleopathic
[ - ] aleleopathic [op] 2 points 2.8 yearsJun 30, 2021 15:28:39 ago (+2/-0)*
The Mathis article on Hawking explains that it is a matter of fact, not belief. Hawking had Lou Gehrig's disease, which degenerates your nerves quickly - most don't like past their 20s, and the jitters/twitches it gives you makes you grind your teeth down.
At some point in his 20s, 'Hawking' supposedly gained all of his teeth back (he had like 2 remaining), got his hair back, and had the standard tells (ear shapes) change. Apparently, we are supposed to think he is the only example of a patient with a disease that kills in the 20s that survived to his fucking mid-70s.
Here is the series:
http://milesmathis.com/hawking.pdf
http://milesmathis.com/hawk3.pdf
http://mileswmathis.com/hawk4.pdf
[ + ] Thisisallstupid
[ - ] Thisisallstupid 1 point 2.8 yearsJun 30, 2021 23:36:51 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] NERVReplicant01
[ - ] NERVReplicant01 0 points 2.8 yearsJul 1, 2021 01:46:34 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] aleleopathic
[ - ] aleleopathic [op] 1 point 2.8 yearsJul 1, 2021 02:34:06 ago (+1/-0)
Also fixed the link in the comment you replied to - I manually typed them in and forgot a letter.
[ + ] NERVReplicant01
[ - ] NERVReplicant01 0 points 2.8 yearsJul 1, 2021 15:26:34 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] aleleopathic
[ - ] aleleopathic [op] 1 point 2.8 yearsJul 1, 2021 16:08:13 ago (+1/-0)
Also, the article is right, but there are better arguments against black holes. Stephen Crothers is the most thorough in his debunking - he make a handful of complete proofs, each of which stands on it's own. This is a good place to start: http://www.naturalphilosophy.org/pdf/abstracts/abstracts_5468.pdf
But his work quickly veers off into other fields as blackholes (e.g. planck, thermodynamics) as the mistakes that produced the 'black hole' are the product of problems elsewhere in physics. Bit of a heady subject: http://www.sjcrothers.plasmaresources.com/
[ + ] NERVReplicant01
[ - ] NERVReplicant01 0 points 2.8 yearsJul 3, 2021 14:59:45 ago (+0/-0)
Since the topic of Einstein seems relatively similar to this one, I was wondering if you had any good sources or links I could go through regarding the fraud of Einstein. I have seen it mentioned on here time and time again, but some quality sources I could verse myself in would be valuable.
[ + ] Nosferatjew
[ - ] Nosferatjew 4 points 2.8 yearsJun 30, 2021 14:44:02 ago (+4/-0)
[ + ] account deleted by user
[ - ] account deleted by user 2 points 2.8 yearsJun 30, 2021 12:43:49 ago (+2/-0)
[ + ]deleted
[ - ] deleted 1 point 2.8 yearsJun 30, 2021 12:56:46 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ]deleted
[ - ] deleted 0 points 2.8 yearsJun 30, 2021 15:11:18 ago (+1/-1)
[ + ] Sledgod
[ - ] Sledgod 6 points 2.8 yearsJun 30, 2021 17:23:01 ago (+6/-0)
[ + ] we_kill_creativity
[ - ] we_kill_creativity 2 points 2.8 yearsJun 30, 2021 17:39:51 ago (+2/-0)
[ + ] KCobain27
[ - ] KCobain27 0 points 2.8 yearsJun 30, 2021 13:06:43 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] gabara
[ - ] gabara 0 points 2.8 yearsJun 30, 2021 10:17:22 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] out
[ - ] out 0 points 2.8 yearsJun 30, 2021 13:50:57 ago (+1/-1)
[ + ] gabara
[ - ] gabara 0 points 2.8 yearsJun 30, 2021 20:23:16 ago (+0/-0)