×
Login Register an account
Top Submissions Explore Upgoat Search Random Subverse Random Post Colorize! Site Rules
31

Paid agent provocateur Joe McCarthy bans users on his sub if you call him a pedophile

submitted by HughBriss to whatever 2.9 yearsJun 14, 2021 09:45:08 ago (+33/-2)     (whatever)

I don't care about his sub. I don't care what he has to say. But I do care about his activity on Voat and the detrimental effect his presence has had.

Just remember, he is a jew, a paid agent provocateur, and a deviant pornographer and pedophile whose agenda to is disrupt and pollute the content on Voat with obscenity with the claim that it's "perfectly legal" and he's just exercising his right to "free speech". Obscenity is not free speech.

Remember, when he has everyone arguing about him, it distracts attention from other things we should discuss. This is a jew media trick, and it seems to work.


82 comments block


[ - ] ripelivanianbeats 8 points 2.9 yearsJun 14, 2021 10:03:18 ago (+11/-3)

It becomes harder and harder to take you guys seriously when you call him a pedophile for posting 18+ women.

[ - ] paul_neri 3 points 2.9 yearsJun 14, 2021 22:22:53 ago (+3/-0)

what do these boys have against women strutting their stuff? I mostly find it boring (seen one fanny you've seen them all) but given the intense, complex nature of most Voat discussions, sometimes a little eye-candy is a welcome relief.

[ - ] heygeorge 1 point 2.9 yearsJun 14, 2021 22:56:23 ago (+1/-0)

intense, complex nature of most Voat discussions

We have those?

[ - ] Joe_McCarthy -1 points 2.9 yearsJun 15, 2021 00:08:23 ago (+1/-2)*

Intense perhaps. When cops are watching one needs to be extra careful how one words things. And what one does even. They report even remotely borderline stuff to the admin.

My main man Tallest_Shill even reported banning people for calling me a pedo from OE.

Complex though? Their aim is to keep that from even happening.

[ - ] account deleted by user 0 points 2.9 yearsJun 15, 2021 05:29:47 ago (+0/-0)

account deleted by user

[ - ] Joe_McCarthy 0 points 2.9 yearsJun 15, 2021 05:32:42 ago (+1/-1)

For bringing what here?

The current special is call me a pedo - get banned. You haven't done that.

[ - ] ripelivanianbeats 0 points 2.9 yearsJun 15, 2021 09:13:34 ago (+0/-0)

I just don't give a shit about like solo playboy photo shoots from 1992. I guess if you're a really devout Christian but otherwise what, possibly looking at a soft-focused nipple is going to kill you?

[ - ] Joe_McCarthy 1 point 2.9 yearsJun 15, 2021 14:09:42 ago (+1/-0)*

I'm probably more religious than most of these people actually. But speaking practically college girls apt to diddle themselves simply don't care much about religion. They aren't usually irreligious either - but that ship has sailed.

The irony is that some of the people that may still care don't care. They're just glowies trying to stir up the site against me.

Hot women finger blasting themselves is awesome. Anyone can see that.

[ - ] paul_neri 4 points 2.9 yearsJun 14, 2021 22:12:14 ago (+4/-0)

panning Joe McC is a lazy way of getting upvotes.

[ - ] Broc_Liath 5 points 2.9 yearsJun 14, 2021 15:17:33 ago (+5/-0)

Obscenity is not free speech.

Ok, so you want the site admin to ban "obscenity"? I need a tight definition of that term please and a proposal for how it's to be enforced.

[ - ] HughBriss [op] 1 point 2.9 yearsJun 14, 2021 21:09:38 ago (+1/-0)

I need a tight definition of that term

I don't, and neither do most people here. I know it when I see it. That's how it used to be before jews obscured the concept of obscenity in most people's minds. At one time, everyone knew what it was obscene. Now, free speech absolutists want a "tight definition" so that jews have wiggle room to create obscenity and push the boundaries farther. I ain't having it.

[ - ] Broc_Liath 2 points 2.9 yearsJun 14, 2021 21:23:45 ago (+2/-0)

If you want to ban something then you absolutely do need to define it. "I know it when I see it" was correctly thrown out shortly after being adopted because it was completely unworkable. The whole point of lines in the sand is that everyone agrees where they are, if it's something you have to make up on a case by case basis then there is no line.

[ - ] HughBriss [op] 1 point 2.9 yearsJun 14, 2021 22:52:54 ago (+1/-0)

correctly thrown out shortly

Who's to say it was "correctly thrown out"? That's your opinion, and just because it's enshrined in "law", it doesn't mean it's "correct". Stop with the moral relativism. Some things are right, and some things are absolutely, definitely wrong. jews want us to think there's no difference. You need to go toward the side of morality and righteousness, especially these days, where the lines between both are barely indistinguishable. Because of jews.

[ - ] Broc_Liath 2 points 2.9 yearsJun 15, 2021 06:16:09 ago (+2/-0)

Who's to say it was "correctly thrown out"?

Me, and anyone else who gives a shit about laws having an actual meaning.

Stop with the moral relativism.

Lmao. I'm the one demanding an objective standard, you're the one who wants a rule based on nothing more than your sense of taste.

Some things are right, and some things are absolutely, definitely wrong.

Fine, so give me a metric. And no "HughBriss's personal opinion" is not an independent measure.

[ - ] IfuckedYerMum 5 points 2.9 yearsJun 14, 2021 10:53:01 ago (+5/-0)

This fucking idiot is still around?

[ - ] paul_neri 1 point 2.9 yearsJun 14, 2021 22:23:15 ago (+2/-1)*

politeness to a fellow-goat, please.That sort of language belongs on Poal.

[ - ] IfuckedYerMum 1 point 2.9 yearsJun 15, 2021 13:51:26 ago (+1/-0)

Fuck off.

[ - ] paul_neri -1 points 2.9 yearsJun 15, 2021 19:51:48 ago (+0/-1)

I have reported you for consistent swearing. You're in a lot of trouble.

[ - ] IfuckedYerMum 0 points 2.9 yearsJun 16, 2021 10:01:34 ago (+0/-0)

Trouble is my middle name.

[ - ] paul_neri 3 points 2.9 yearsJun 14, 2021 22:10:41 ago (+3/-0)

I am insanely jealous of the bro getting so much attention. Leave him alone and dish out some of that delicious love to, um, others, yes others. It's unfair that Joe is the centre of attention on this site! Look at li'l @sparklingwiggle for example, sparkling away, hoping she'll be noticed, doing a tummy-flop even...

[ - ] SparklingWiggle 0 points 2.9 yearsJun 18, 2021 16:30:02 ago (+0/-0)

Do you even know what a sparkling wiggle is?

[ - ] paul_neri 0 points 2.9 yearsJun 19, 2021 00:46:26 ago (+0/-0)

OMG!

sparkling wiggle
A version of "fucking nigger"
From an internet video of a little girl being encouraged by her parents to say "sparkling wiggles" which she then pronuonces as "fucking niggers."
http://emuse. ebaumsworld. com/video/watch/17813
Mother: Say "Get a job , you sparkling wiggle."

Baby Girl: Get a job you fucking nigger!
by fannyhamsteak April 04, 2007

[Voat Library Service]

[ - ] fightknightHERO 4 points 2.9 yearsJun 14, 2021 12:48:43 ago (+4/-0)

why does system allow such an obvious kike in his site?

[ - ] MasklessTheGreat 1 point 2.9 yearsJun 14, 2021 19:55:59 ago (+1/-0)

Because kikes run this site. Think about it. Nothing is free.

[ - ] fightknightHERO 0 points 2.9 yearsJun 15, 2021 04:36:11 ago (+0/-0)

i really think so
perhaps they're hoping for another Tarrant or to simply Dox the nationalists who fedpost too hard

regardless system is not straight and cyna needs to lose some weight

P.S i think oldvoat existed purely to promote the (((Q)))tardation and jewnald Trump
have you ever noticed how pro trump posts are instantly boosted yet another anti-trump , no matter how true it is
always gets ratio'd?

[ - ] HughBriss [op] -1 points 2.9 yearsJun 14, 2021 21:10:32 ago (+0/-1)

That is true. Even system. I'm convinced of it. Remember that your reading and posting in a JIDF honeypot.

[ - ] MasklessTheGreat 1 point 2.9 yearsJun 14, 2021 21:36:13 ago (+1/-0)*

Everyone wants that faggot gone but the mods are all “free speech”. Them shit fucks are glowing like an LED flashlight that can set paper on fire.

[ - ] paul_neri 1 point 2.9 yearsJun 14, 2021 22:13:32 ago (+1/-0)

I don't.

[ - ] Kung_Flu 1 point 2.9 yearsJun 14, 2021 17:25:09 ago (+1/-0)

Because anyone can moderate their own sub as they see fit. That's just the nature of reddit clones.

[ - ] fightknightHERO -1 points 2.9 yearsJun 14, 2021 17:28:23 ago (+0/-1)

fair enough, though i'd make a simple as fuck feature that disables NSFW posts from appearing in the v/all-new
if the post is NSFW

then again, you can always block his smut subs and be done with it.

[ - ] shitface9000 4 points 2.9 yearsJun 14, 2021 10:04:00 ago (+4/-0)

IDGAF

[ - ] paul_neri 0 points 2.9 yearsJun 14, 2021 22:16:41 ago (+1/-1)*

"IDGAF" Intuitive Daydreamer Joyous [and] Frank

[Voat Library Service]

E: "G" ?

[ - ] try 1 point 2.9 yearsJun 15, 2021 00:36:59 ago (+1/-0)*

IDGAF means "I'm Definitely Gay As Fuck"

.. or so i heard.

[ - ] paul_neri 0 points 2.9 yearsJun 15, 2021 00:40:45 ago (+0/-0)

Thanks, bro, I think you're right.

[ - ] try 4 points 2.9 yearsJun 14, 2021 10:00:53 ago (+5/-1)*

DANGER!!!! Its an attack on voat and catbox

I know that voat.xyz is not an image server and he only posts links to stuff offsite, but its to attack catbox.moe.

After I begged multiple times to not put erotica and porn onto catbox.moe, to set up catbox.moe with a eventual ADL/SPLC/JIDF/ShareBlue takedown,, he said he would continue to set up catbox.moe with destruction!!!!!

He mercifully stopped for a few days, but I see he resumed today in setting up catbox.moe for a kiddie pron false flag from a vpn submission by leftists this year.

countless image servers exist for him to use that ban jew naming posts but allow porn :

https://old.reddit.com/r/imguralternatives/

CATBOX.MOE is provably the last remaining known image site that allows jew fact images and jew fact videos.

countless porn hosting image sites exist for him to use other than catbox.moe, but he wants to aid in destroying the ONLY image site known that allows and never deletes JEW NAMING VIDEOS.

*HE WANTS TO DESTROY CATBOX.MOE, and it has nothing to do with him liking porn

It is a strategic attack on catbox.moe after catbox is flooded with 99% legal porn and 99% legal nudes.

He may indeed be part of a paid operation.

-https://magaimg.net DEAD! [shoahed by SPLC and libtard attackers uploading kiddie pr0n and telling FBI]

-https://maga.host/ [shoahed by SPLC and libtard attackers uploading kiddie pr0n and telling FBI]

-[mostly dead] imgoat.com HAS ANCIENT UPLOADS BUT NOW SPLC SHOAHED, AND NOT TAKING NEW CONTENT. Old content
working example* :
https://imgoat.com/uploads/6d767d2f8e/21631.jpg









I like all free speech, and I believe some so-called porn needs to be on internet, but not here on a targeted site hated Democrats and Hated by Jews.


If catbox.moe goes.... voat.xyz goes.

Porn links to catbox.moe is a a strategic take-down attack by the left.

I dont care what links he posts (they are just links and world court and usa appeals court law says links are NOT hosting).. but i care that he is trying to take down catbox and also to unmask voat.xyz using felony investigations into sharing links to servers that host porn with missing age records.

[ - ] Artificial_Intelligentile 2 points 2.9 yearsJun 14, 2021 13:31:40 ago (+2/-0)

thats the ONLY valid take on the situation. thanky you, try, for sharing your superior insight with us once again. Is there any topic you are not an expert on? =)

[ - ] UrCoolerOlderBrother 2 points 2.9 yearsJun 14, 2021 16:38:00 ago (+2/-0)

I agree. There is plenty of porn sites online. Anyone that is posting porn any place other than designated porn sites, has an ulterior motive, is a fuckn degenerate retard, or is both. None of which I want anywhere near me or my frequented websites.

[ - ] UrCoolerOlderBrother 1 point 2.9 yearsJun 14, 2021 16:39:13 ago (+1/-0)

And what happened to imgoat?

[ - ] try 3 points 2.9 yearsJun 14, 2021 16:56:11 ago (+3/-0)

JIDF and reddit leftists , and even reddit tranny supporters, made it a target : https://www.reddit.com/r/GenderCynical/comments/7akbo9/now_theyre_linking_to_imgoat/

i do not know if feds knocked on door from false flagged kiddie pr0n or not, but you can see the left had it in their sights.

[ - ] UrCoolerOlderBrother 2 points 2.9 yearsJun 14, 2021 16:56:50 ago (+2/-0)

Fuckn faggots

[ - ] deleted 1 point 2.9 yearsJun 14, 2021 18:17:16 ago (+1/-0)

deleted

[ - ] account deleted by user 4 points 2.9 yearsJun 14, 2021 09:47:33 ago (+5/-1)

account deleted by user

[ - ] HughBriss [op] 3 points 2.9 yearsJun 14, 2021 09:48:51 ago (+3/-0)

That's my thinking too. The opinion of a pedophile jew is meaningless to me.

[ - ] account deleted by user 3 points 2.9 yearsJun 14, 2021 09:54:13 ago (+3/-0)

account deleted by user

[ - ] i_hate_sodomites 1 point 2.9 yearsJun 14, 2021 16:10:18 ago (+1/-0)

"pedophile jew". You're being redundant.

[ - ] account deleted by user 0 points 2.9 yearsJun 14, 2021 15:09:14 ago (+0/-0)

account deleted by user

[ - ] UrCoolerOlderBrother 0 points 2.9 yearsJun 14, 2021 16:32:34 ago (+0/-0)

Why?

[ - ] account deleted by user 2 points 2.9 yearsJun 14, 2021 16:44:12 ago (+2/-0)

account deleted by user

[ - ] deleted 0 points 2.9 yearsJun 14, 2021 18:15:28 ago (+0/-0)

deleted

[ - ] chrimony 0 points 2.9 yearsJun 14, 2021 18:41:09 ago (+0/-0)

You got banned for posting child pornography repeatedly after I warned you to stop.

I thought you were a decent person, but this is shit. You're making up lies because others have said that some of your posts were child porn. I only saw one post that was dubious (the artist painting), and also a screenshot of a deleted post that was deleted by a moderator for being on the line (but I can't see the actual image). You can agree or disagree that what you posted was child porn, but at least there was an argument to be had with real evidence. You are just making up shit out of whole cloth to get revenge. Inexcusable.

[ - ] deleted 0 points 2.9 yearsJun 14, 2021 20:38:09 ago (+0/-0)

deleted

[ - ] Antiliberalsociety 3 points 2.9 yearsJun 14, 2021 10:49:33 ago (+5/-2)

[ - ] deleted 4 points 2.9 yearsJun 14, 2021 12:13:28 ago (+6/-2)

deleted

[ - ] Antiliberalsociety 1 point 2.9 yearsJun 14, 2021 13:29:16 ago (+2/-1)

Maybe if you weren't a pedophile you wouldn't have to worry about being exposed as one. I love how you double down on that shit as if increasing your creep posting will somehow exonerate you from being pegged as the pedo you are.

[ - ] deleted 2 points 2.9 yearsJun 14, 2021 12:16:12 ago (+3/-1)

deleted

[ - ] Antiliberalsociety 1 point 2.9 yearsJun 14, 2021 13:28:05 ago (+2/-1)

I wonder why you aren't keeping count of my rising upvotes that far outweigh the downvotes? Hmmmmmm, seems kind of harassing.

[ - ] Kattie 1 point 2.9 yearsJun 15, 2021 09:50:54 ago (+1/-0)

Well, my turn to say something now. I've known the man who calls himself Joe McCarthy for some years now and I know this:

1. He's not a Jew. He even used to be an anti-Semite earlier but changed his views.

2. He's not a pedophile.

[ - ] Joe_McCarthy 1 point 2.9 yearsJun 15, 2021 06:54:24 ago (+1/-0)*

Just out of curiosity... who is paying me? If you say American Jews they're likely to be running if I get my way. Not because I favor targeting them as such but because a well to do minority does not benefit from chaos. If you say Israel they may want Jews to return - but hardly under such circumstances.

Your best bet would be Russian interests. But I'm not notably pro-Russian (for that matter was George Washington merely a pawn of France?) and in any case we have our own interests in not seeing American cities full of mongrels in two generations. If all you're shooting for is constitutional government and essentially maintaining the status quo of accelerating mass interracial sex you may not care much though. And if you're any one of a number of interests you're not going to like what I think is necessary. Including a revolutionary racialist movement seizing power somewhere in the present US. With territorial power and control of borders. And with that probably being a springboard for further seizure of US territory down the road.

[ - ] NaturalSelectionistWorker 2 points 2.9 yearsJun 14, 2021 12:26:21 ago (+2/-0)

Is he still posting here?

[ - ] deleted 2 points 2.9 yearsJun 14, 2021 09:59:36 ago (+3/-1)

deleted

[ - ] areyousureaboutthat 0 points 2.9 yearsJun 15, 2021 20:11:50 ago (+0/-0)

You're another cackling hen. Jesus. He is your soap opera. Stop paying him attention faggot.

[ - ] voatisajewishheaven 1 point 2.9 yearsJun 14, 2021 18:28:40 ago (+1/-0)

All I see is posts about people calling out this guy I never heard about before. Who the fuck is this guy?

[ - ] paul_neri 2 points 2.9 yearsJun 14, 2021 22:40:38 ago (+2/-0)*

I've known him for some time albeit @dulcima (a girl) knows him better. Here is a thumbnail character sketch I did of the dude for the Bureau back in Voat1 days

"...polite, intelligent (ex school-teacher), very calm-not easily provoked, a muscled-up dude IRL, an unusual subscriber to Voat given his intellectual interests[check:CIA?]; posts girlie-pics as a sub-interest [check: flush out unlawful activity?.

Conclusion: given the wide respect in which the subject is held on the Voat Message Board, the subject clearly has leadership ability. This attribute and his obvious intelligence makes him a suitable candidate for cultivating for the Bureau's purposes. Permission sought to implement stage 1 of the induction process." [15 May 2019]

[ - ] Joe_McCarthy 2 points 2.9 yearsJun 14, 2021 23:24:35 ago (+2/-0)

Broadly correct except substitute CIA agent for 'racially motivated violent extremist' in federal law enforcement parlance. And if you are looking at federal law enforcement here it sure isn't me.

In part the porn is even a visibility enhancer. You may have noticed my visibility is constantly suppressed by brigading. It was suppressed before I started posting the stuff too. I mean, these people could just be the usual Jew obsessed retards. Some are I think. But I see hostiles blending in.

[ - ] RepublicanNerd 1 point 2.9 yearsJun 14, 2021 17:26:09 ago (+2/-1)

Joes has bern a paid agent provocateur on the original voat, ruqqus, poal and now here. Tries to play the same stupid mind games while posting kiddie porn and spanking off to it.

[ - ] i_hate_sodomites 1 point 2.9 yearsJun 14, 2021 16:14:00 ago (+1/-0)

What sub are y'all talking about??? I've never seen any of this shit show up on the front page, or even 15 pages down. How the hell are you even finding it???

[ - ] paul_neri 1 point 2.9 yearsJun 14, 2021 22:46:31 ago (+1/-0)

You have brought the hammer to the nail, old boy. People who get their rocks off being offended will leave no stone un-turned until, surprise! surprise!...

[ - ] heygeorge 0 points 2.9 yearsJun 14, 2021 22:59:40 ago (+0/-0)

The best folks browse all/new

[ - ] poopdawg15 1 point 2.9 yearsJun 14, 2021 13:13:58 ago (+4/-3)

I have the longest history with Joe_McCarthy, to my knowledge, of anyone.

Yes, he is an agent provocateur. Yes, he began infiltrating Ruqqus after I had alerted him to its existence. Yes, he has gone to outrageous lengths to deny Jewish Bolshevism, in the face of mountains of competing evidence.

He still is decently likable.

[ - ] HughBriss [op] 4 points 2.9 yearsJun 14, 2021 13:15:50 ago (+4/-0)

Charm and likeability are two traits for sociopathy. Not saying he is one, but I'm just sayin'.

[ - ] paul_neri 0 points 2.9 yearsJun 14, 2021 22:55:02 ago (+0/-0)

Hugh, babe, (excuse the familiarity), Joe to one side, you ain't wrong. I read somewhere once someone saying they are very suspicious of charming people. [warning: p neri rant coming]. In life we mostly get advantages from other people so if we can persuade people to give us advantages then we come off tops and survival is the name of the game.For most of us obtaining advantages from our fellow man, but especially our fellow woman, is difficult work but if we have something that attracts that other person to us e.g. we are likeable and charming, then our job is made so much easier. There's nothing wrong with being likeable and charming per se it's just that such folk inevitably abuse their natural gifts.

[ - ] paul_neri 1 point 2.9 yearsJun 14, 2021 22:57:23 ago (+1/-0)*

suggest @dulcima would give you a run for your money? For a while I was very jealous of the love dulcima had for him to the exclusion of me but...I took a cold shower.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=chq885RKXAI

[ - ] deleted 1 point 2.9 yearsJun 14, 2021 23:12:36 ago (+1/-0)

deleted

[ - ] paul_neri 0 points 2.9 yearsJun 14, 2021 23:30:39 ago (+0/-0)

very funny response!

[ - ] RepublicanNerd 1 point 2.9 yearsJun 14, 2021 17:28:43 ago (+1/-0)

Many great serial killers were deemed ‘likeable’

[ - ] RMGoetbbels 0 points 2.9 yearsJun 14, 2021 17:28:10 ago (+0/-0)

"I have the longest history with Joe_McCarthy, to my knowledge, of anyone."

Yeahhhh uh? I don't think so. I've been banned since 2016 because JOE SUCKS JEW DICK. And can go fuck himself.

[ - ] poopdawg15 0 points 2.9 yearsJun 14, 2021 17:33:14 ago (+0/-0)

who's the big winner

[ - ] RMGoetbbels 0 points 2.9 yearsJun 15, 2021 16:44:07 ago (+0/-0)

Dammit. You do have a point. I AM!

[ - ] Joe_McCarthy 1 point 2.9 yearsJun 14, 2021 11:39:53 ago (+6/-5)

You guys are idiots, paid disruptors, or a combo of the two. In any case you won't be missed in my sub.

[ - ] HughBriss [op] 3 points 2.9 yearsJun 14, 2021 12:11:42 ago (+3/-0)

The jew always projects.

[ - ] ClaytonBigsby313 0 points 2.9 yearsJun 15, 2021 06:03:24 ago (+0/-0)

Stop participating in site drama. Just stop.

[ - ] albatrosv15 0 points 2.9 yearsJun 14, 2021 15:30:31 ago (+0/-0)

How do we see the banned users on a sub?

[ - ] deleted 2 points 2.9 yearsJun 14, 2021 18:18:41 ago (+2/-0)

deleted