Nicely said! I've seen so many things in the last half dozen years I wouldn't have thought possible and I've seen some crazy things for crazy reasons but trying to make pedophilia a sexuality? I know every generation thinks the coming generation is worse than the previous but we do seem to be on a fast road on slouching towards Gomorrah. I wonder if the parents of this current generation had any idea what their kids were being taught.
yes, i think porn should be forbidden, reported and deleted if posted. 3 strikes and your account is gone too.
Simple reason for this is that we do not want to take the risks associated with it. Theres simply no way to make sure that all images posted are legal.
We have to protect this site better than we did protect old voat, or this site will also explode in cost and shut down.
You have a point but maybe it's just a matter of more careful modding and perhaps coming to some arrangement with Joe that he is a bit more circumspect with his girlie pics? I'd hate to see Voat2 disappear because of some "lettuce leaves" ( a phrase I heard recently).
I'm a firm believer pretty girls should be encouraged to do what they are good at. And I actively promote that just by posting the stuff.
Chances of posting anything underage are slim. And if I did post anything by mistake due to the use of fake IDs or whatever, let's say, I have a hard time seeing how it's even going to be discovered.
I'd lower the age of consent for solos to 15. Certainly 16. That'd match age of consent to have sex in over 30 US states. Not that it says anything about what I actually post - but it does speak to my ethics. If a 17 year old is diddling herself on a fake ID that's pretty hot. And no one, including me, is going to be the wiser anyway. I don't even think it happens much. And Voat didn't close due to this stuff anyway.
Agreed. Obscenity is not free speech. It's not "censorship", it's curation.
Think of it this way: Do newspapers print pornography? They do not. They say they support free speech and the First Amendment, but they don't print porn because it's extremely inappropriate. They curate their content. They moderate what they will and will not print. That's not censorship, that's curation.
Some of you free speech absolutists will argue with me because this isn't a perfect comparison, but fuck you, I don't care. We don't need porn here.
You have no credibility when it comes to determining what is obscene or not. And when you say "naked woman", you mean either a woman masturbating or an underage girl, so even when you make such a short and bland statment as "Obscenity is saying "fuck you" not a naked woman", you hide your real meaning.
You're a foul mouthed drunk. Certainly foul mouthed. You're in no position to call me, a much nicer guy than you are (though that isn't saying much as you come off like an angry misanthrope like many here) an asshole. Asshole.
I get a rise out of people that take it upon themselves to tell me what I get to post on a free speech board, yeah. They make it too easy. I mean, who do they think they are? I know gall is likely a foreign concept to you - but such people can kiss my ass.
I'm not that nice of a guy though. I'm arrogant. And I'm argumentative. And I don't mind being an intellectual bully to those that deserve it. Your drunken profanity though is just run-of-the-mill assholishness. You even lack enough finesse to claim plausible deniability.
I said I'm a lot nicer guy than you are. And I am. You never got out of grade school. Your insults are still four letter words. You just added alcohol and made it worse. Much the same can be said for these other jokers around here.
I mean, there are degrees. There are smartasses that maintain the basics of surface politeness. There are sauve types like me. But we still know we're better than you are. And you know we know.
This place has always allowed porn. Or I should say the other place did and this place followed through on it. On free speech grounds. That settled the matter until the alt-right anti-coomer brigade decided to impose their views on the site some 3 years ago. These people want to ban me for it. You're drunk. Have another beer.
Intellectual bully, haha yeah you're a genius alright! Not smart enough to know when he's not wanted or to much of a douchebag to care. Don't you have any friends that like having you around?
I have to agree. I don't give a shit what the law says (it's all jew bullshit anyway), what matters is that it's a debasement of white women. This is clear and obvious kikery; only kike vermin and misogynist shits think this sort of thing is okay.
If you want porn, the internet is fucking full of it. Go to a porn site to wank up. But doing this on Voat is basically kikes saying "fuck you, white people! Look at what degrading things we can get your women to do!" Really, it's kikes going on a hard right-wing site and laughing right in our fucking faces, then screaming "free speech!" when someone has the balls to call them out, just like they scream "anti-semite!" if you dare to disagree with them.
I've come to the conclusion that Joe McCarthy is a kike faggot who deliberately and willfully is doing just this. He's a long-nosed parasitical shit trying to fuck Voat up simply to show us that no place is safe from the jew, and that the jews laugh at us by showing us how they can make our women into whores - even here, in a place that hates the fucking jews and the fucking whores. He's spitting in our faces with every pic.
And if this stuff becomes normalized, what's next? Jailbait? They tried that shit on old Voat too; even tried to upload kiddie porn to get Voat shut down. I say let's ban porn altogether and tell the kikes "you want porn, there are a hundred thousand kike porn factories on the internet; go there". Let the kikes scream about "free speech", because regardless of the what the jew supreme court says pornography is NOT speech.
I'm not interested in porn but I do like looking at boobs every now and again and I feel safer looking at them on this site and Reddit as distinct from those creepy sites dripping with malware.
Downvoating has essentially no effect on an account's capabilities though, unlike on voat.co, where negative CCP restricted an account's ability to downvoat, comment, or post.
Yeah. Your real interest is getting me banned anyway for any reason. I think we both know why too. And it's not because you genuinely think Jews control the weather and stole your underarm deodorant.
We genuinely think jews control the pornography industry and always have. That's why we don't want it, or you, here.
Everyone: Read about Reuben Sturman, who was called "the Walt Disney of porn", the man who controlled 90% of the creation, production, and distribution of porn in the US before he died. One of his companies was "Doc Johnson", which some of you have heard of. Like Al Capone, he died in prison after being convicted of tax evasion. My source is "Reefer Madness: Sex, Drugs, and Cheap Labor in the American Black Market" by Eric Schlosser.
Because censorship is an intrinsic part of commie-socialist ideology, and as such is about as anti-American as one can get. Because you cannot have your cake and eat it too...censorship and Free Speech are mutually exclusive. Because when you weaponize censorship, it is only a matter of time before them you used it against, finds a way to use it against you (as recent times has well proven).
I have nothing against porn. I used to be quite the fan, once upon a time. Just because I no longer use it does not mean the younger folk cannot. Just because I quit smoking does not mean I ban cigs in my place. That said, I see no reason why a compromise cannot be reached. Joe_McCarthy said "Just block the sub, ya whiners." Nosferatjew said "What about when you post porn to v/whatever and other non-porn subs?" Herein lies the crux. I can think of no reason why porn cannot be contained on one or two agreed on subs, which allows plenty of opportunity for 'free expression', while allowing the anti-porn xtians to practice some self-censorship by blocking those subs. Problem solved. Or is it? Somehow I suspect Joe will not be happy limiting his porn activity to one or two subs that his target audience can block, nor will the jesusfreako contingent be willing to allow any subs that permit sexual content. I suspect compromise is not a part of either mindset. Prove me wrong.
Degeneracy cannot willingly contain itself, it's contrary to the nature of it. Like flashers, they WILL shove their meat in your face, because that's half the point.
We no longer have free speech in the US, but for most of the years we did, porn was illegal. It only took 40 years of jewish influence to go from criminalizing porn to legal porn and banning anti-banker speech (using the newly created FCC and more).
If we want a "happy" compromise, we need this: "posting porn outside of porn subs is a sitewide ban". I'd prefer to see it gone entirely, because porn is more like a hypnotic drug than communication.
Not necessarily easy to maintain when the bulk of the userbase are Nazis that don't believe in free speech in the first place, federal informants infiltrating as Nazis, or antifa doing the same. Then it's a matter of using any vehicle to deplatform anyone that is simply banned under Reddit's dangerous individuals policy.
Involved topic. I have strong National Socialist influences myself. But I'm not much of an anti-Semite and I do think the US needed to defeat Hitler. Most of you, to the extent you are serious people at all, have taken Nazism's worst aspects. The goofball Jew paranoia of course. Though yours is even a caricature of theirs. You are more like untermenschen to be put in concentration camps than SS material.
It answered it. But I'll answer it another way: National Socialism is a foreign enemy ideology defeated by history. That is sufficient cause not to adhere to it. I don't identify with history's losers. Time for something new.
Jews though are a mixed bag. Even at their worst they are not as dangerous or powerful as you think they are. And they are just one group that is problematic. A secondary one at that to the extent they should be spoken of monolithically at all.
If I told you the US Conference of Catholic Bishops is the largest refugee resettlement group in the US would you state baldly that Catholics are the enemies of the white race? Your approach lacks any real direction. And you don't know Jews when you see them, or don't see them such as in my case. Ya know, part of that goofball Jew paranoia I told you about.
[ + ] account deleted by user
[ - ] account deleted by user 13 points 3.9 yearsJun 12, 2021 17:38:30 ago (+13/-0)
[ + ] account deleted by user
[ - ] account deleted by user 4 points 3.9 yearsJun 13, 2021 02:48:37 ago (+5/-1)
[ + ] Deleted
[ - ] deleted 8 points 3.9 yearsJun 13, 2021 03:28:54 ago (+8/-0)
[ + ] WhiteCollarCriminal
[ - ] WhiteCollarCriminal 3 points 3.9 yearsJun 13, 2021 11:03:25 ago (+3/-0)
[ + ] Deleted
[ - ] deleted 7 points 3.9 yearsJun 12, 2021 17:40:30 ago (+10/-3)
[ + ] account deleted by user
[ - ] account deleted by user 3 points 3.9 yearsJun 13, 2021 02:48:55 ago (+3/-0)
[ + ] Deleted
[ - ] deleted 2 points 3.9 yearsJun 13, 2021 07:48:52 ago (+2/-0)
[ + ] Unused_Rain_Coat
[ - ] Unused_Rain_Coat 7 points 3.9 yearsJun 12, 2021 17:25:53 ago (+9/-2)
may I remind you that the Old voat had porn
[ + ] kishind
[ - ] kishind 0 points 3.9 yearsJun 14, 2021 08:48:03 ago (+0/-0)
Porn is not speech. Porn is human trafficking.
[ + ] Unused_Rain_Coat
[ - ] Unused_Rain_Coat 0 points 3.9 yearsJun 14, 2021 17:15:05 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] Artificial_Intelligentile
[ - ] Artificial_Intelligentile 5 points 3.9 yearsJun 13, 2021 03:36:06 ago (+5/-0)
Simple reason for this is that we do not want to take the risks associated with it. Theres simply no way to make sure that all images posted are legal.
We have to protect this site better than we did protect old voat, or this site will also explode in cost and shut down.
Therefore: Downvote all filth!
[ + ] paul_neri
[ - ] paul_neri 2 points 3.9 yearsJun 13, 2021 05:58:31 ago (+2/-0)
[ + ] Artificial_Intelligentile
[ - ] Artificial_Intelligentile 2 points 3.9 yearsJun 13, 2021 11:07:29 ago (+2/-0)
the whole web is full of porn. we dont need it here, we dont want it here, and we do not want the people here who want it.
[ + ] paul_neri
[ - ] paul_neri 0 points 3.9 yearsJun 13, 2021 20:26:33 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] Joe_McCarthy
[ - ] Joe_McCarthy -1 points 3.9 yearsJun 13, 2021 08:18:19 ago (+1/-2)*
Chances of posting anything underage are slim. And if I did post anything by mistake due to the use of fake IDs or whatever, let's say, I have a hard time seeing how it's even going to be discovered.
I'd lower the age of consent for solos to 15. Certainly 16. That'd match age of consent to have sex in over 30 US states. Not that it says anything about what I actually post - but it does speak to my ethics. If a 17 year old is diddling herself on a fake ID that's pretty hot. And no one, including me, is going to be the wiser anyway. I don't even think it happens much. And Voat didn't close due to this stuff anyway.
[ + ] HughBriss
[ - ] HughBriss 0 points 3.9 yearsJun 13, 2021 10:25:00 ago (+0/-0)
Tracy Lords would disagree with you.
[ + ] Joe_McCarthy
[ - ] Joe_McCarthy 1 point 3.9 yearsJun 13, 2021 10:45:16 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] WhiteCollarCriminal
[ - ] WhiteCollarCriminal 0 points 3.9 yearsJun 13, 2021 11:32:48 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] Artificial_Intelligentile
[ - ] Artificial_Intelligentile 0 points 3.9 yearsJun 13, 2021 11:36:17 ago (+0/-0)
another factor that makes me greatly appreciate the absence of filth is that we dont attract people who would come here attracted by the filth.
[ + ] areyousureaboutthat
[ - ] areyousureaboutthat -3 points 3.9 yearsJun 13, 2021 05:39:58 ago (+0/-3)
[ + ] Artificial_Intelligentile
[ - ] Artificial_Intelligentile 2 points 3.9 yearsJun 13, 2021 11:08:59 ago (+2/-0)
hows the weather in Telaviv?
[ + ] areyousureaboutthat
[ - ] areyousureaboutthat 0 points 3.9 yearsJun 13, 2021 15:50:00 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] HughBriss
[ - ] HughBriss 5 points 3.9 yearsJun 12, 2021 19:17:15 ago (+5/-0)*
Think of it this way: Do newspapers print pornography? They do not. They say they support free speech and the First Amendment, but they don't print porn because it's extremely inappropriate. They curate their content. They moderate what they will and will not print. That's not censorship, that's curation.
Some of you free speech absolutists will argue with me because this isn't a perfect comparison, but fuck you, I don't care. We don't need porn here.
[ + ] i_scream_trucks
[ - ] i_scream_trucks 1 point 3.9 yearsJun 12, 2021 23:44:51 ago (+3/-2)
it is freedom of expression tho.
dont like it dont click on it. simple as that.
[ + ] paul_neri
[ - ] paul_neri 0 points 3.9 yearsJun 13, 2021 05:49:29 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] Joe_McCarthy
[ - ] Joe_McCarthy -8 points 3.9 yearsJun 13, 2021 02:46:01 ago (+1/-9)
[ + ] HughBriss
[ - ] HughBriss 5 points 3.9 yearsJun 13, 2021 08:41:21 ago (+5/-0)
[ + ] Joe_McCarthy
[ - ] Joe_McCarthy -1 points 3.9 yearsJun 13, 2021 10:08:52 ago (+1/-2)
[ + ] account deleted by user
[ - ] account deleted by user 3 points 3.9 yearsJun 12, 2021 20:51:54 ago (+5/-2)
[ + ] Joe_McCarthy
[ - ] Joe_McCarthy -5 points 3.9 yearsJun 13, 2021 00:59:41 ago (+2/-7)
[ + ] HughBriss
[ - ] HughBriss 3 points 3.9 yearsJun 13, 2021 08:42:25 ago (+3/-0)
[ + ] account deleted by user
[ - ] account deleted by user 2 points 3.9 yearsJun 13, 2021 10:35:12 ago (+2/-0)
[ + ] Joe_McCarthy
[ - ] Joe_McCarthy -1 points 3.9 yearsJun 13, 2021 10:52:53 ago (+1/-2)
I'm not that nice of a guy though. I'm arrogant. And I'm argumentative. And I don't mind being an intellectual bully to those that deserve it. Your drunken profanity though is just run-of-the-mill assholishness. You even lack enough finesse to claim plausible deniability.
[ + ] account deleted by user
[ - ] account deleted by user 2 points 3.9 yearsJun 13, 2021 11:04:45 ago (+2/-0)
[ + ] Joe_McCarthy
[ - ] Joe_McCarthy -1 points 3.9 yearsJun 13, 2021 11:17:47 ago (+1/-2)*
I mean, there are degrees. There are smartasses that maintain the basics of surface politeness. There are sauve types like me. But we still know we're better than you are. And you know we know.
[ + ] account deleted by user
[ - ] account deleted by user 1 point 3.9 yearsJun 13, 2021 11:22:27 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] Joe_McCarthy
[ - ] Joe_McCarthy 1 point 3.9 yearsJun 13, 2021 11:39:35 ago (+1/-0)*
[ + ] account deleted by user
[ - ] account deleted by user 0 points 3.9 yearsJun 13, 2021 12:04:15 ago (+0/-0)*
[ + ] WhiteCollarCriminal
[ - ] WhiteCollarCriminal 0 points 3.9 yearsJun 13, 2021 11:23:00 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] i_hate_sodomites
[ - ] i_hate_sodomites 0 points 3.9 yearsJun 14, 2021 21:51:00 ago (+0/-0)
If you want porn, the internet is fucking full of it. Go to a porn site to wank up. But doing this on Voat is basically kikes saying "fuck you, white people! Look at what degrading things we can get your women to do!" Really, it's kikes going on a hard right-wing site and laughing right in our fucking faces, then screaming "free speech!" when someone has the balls to call them out, just like they scream "anti-semite!" if you dare to disagree with them.
I've come to the conclusion that Joe McCarthy is a kike faggot who deliberately and willfully is doing just this. He's a long-nosed parasitical shit trying to fuck Voat up simply to show us that no place is safe from the jew, and that the jews laugh at us by showing us how they can make our women into whores - even here, in a place that hates the fucking jews and the fucking whores. He's spitting in our faces with every pic.
And if this stuff becomes normalized, what's next? Jailbait? They tried that shit on old Voat too; even tried to upload kiddie porn to get Voat shut down. I say let's ban porn altogether and tell the kikes "you want porn, there are a hundred thousand kike porn factories on the internet; go there". Let the kikes scream about "free speech", because regardless of the what the jew supreme court says pornography is NOT speech.
[ + ] paul_neri
[ - ] paul_neri 2 points 3.9 yearsJun 13, 2021 05:53:53 ago (+2/-0)
[ + ] spasswerk
[ - ] spasswerk 3 points 3.9 yearsJun 12, 2021 19:12:16 ago (+4/-1)
[ + ] Nosferatjew
[ - ] Nosferatjew 4 points 3.9 yearsJun 13, 2021 01:26:30 ago (+4/-0)*
[ + ] Joe_McCarthy
[ - ] Joe_McCarthy -5 points 3.9 yearsJun 13, 2021 01:40:12 ago (+1/-6)
[ + ] Nosferatjew
[ - ] Nosferatjew 7 points 3.9 yearsJun 13, 2021 02:01:17 ago (+7/-0)
[ + ] HughBriss
[ - ] HughBriss 3 points 3.9 yearsJun 13, 2021 08:49:23 ago (+3/-0)
Everyone: Read about Reuben Sturman, who was called "the Walt Disney of porn", the man who controlled 90% of the creation, production, and distribution of porn in the US before he died. One of his companies was "Doc Johnson", which some of you have heard of. Like Al Capone, he died in prison after being convicted of tax evasion. My source is "Reefer Madness: Sex, Drugs, and Cheap Labor in the American Black Market" by Eric Schlosser.
[ + ] Nosferatjew
[ - ] Nosferatjew 1 point 3.9 yearsJun 13, 2021 01:24:23 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] Redhairin
[ - ] Redhairin 0 points 3.9 yearsJun 14, 2021 01:17:39 ago (+0/-0)
I have nothing against porn. I used to be quite the fan, once upon a time. Just because I no longer use it does not mean the younger folk cannot. Just because I quit smoking does not mean I ban cigs in my place. That said, I see no reason why a compromise cannot be reached. Joe_McCarthy said "Just block the sub, ya whiners." Nosferatjew said "What about when you post porn to v/whatever and other non-porn subs?" Herein lies the crux. I can think of no reason why porn cannot be contained on one or two agreed on subs, which allows plenty of opportunity for 'free expression', while allowing the anti-porn xtians to practice some self-censorship by blocking those subs. Problem solved. Or is it? Somehow I suspect Joe will not be happy limiting his porn activity to one or two subs that his target audience can block, nor will the jesusfreako contingent be willing to allow any subs that permit sexual content. I suspect compromise is not a part of either mindset. Prove me wrong.
[ + ] kishind
[ - ] kishind 0 points 3.9 yearsJun 14, 2021 09:09:55 ago (+0/-0)
We no longer have free speech in the US, but for most of the years we did, porn was illegal. It only took 40 years of jewish influence to go from criminalizing porn to legal porn and banning anti-banker speech (using the newly created FCC and more).
If we want a "happy" compromise, we need this: "posting porn outside of porn subs is a sitewide ban". I'd prefer to see it gone entirely, because porn is more like a hypnotic drug than communication.
[ + ] TheSimulacra
[ - ] TheSimulacra [op] 0 points 3.9 yearsJun 14, 2021 19:27:49 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] Shotinthedark
[ - ] Shotinthedark 1 point 3.9 yearsJun 12, 2021 18:01:15 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] 2Drunk
[ - ] 2Drunk 0 points 3.9 yearsJun 13, 2021 10:17:02 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] areyousureaboutthat
[ - ] areyousureaboutthat 0 points 3.9 yearsJun 13, 2021 05:37:25 ago (+2/-2)
[ + ] Joe_McCarthy
[ - ] Joe_McCarthy -1 points 3.9 yearsJun 13, 2021 08:47:41 ago (+1/-2)
Not necessarily easy to maintain when the bulk of the userbase are Nazis that don't believe in free speech in the first place, federal informants infiltrating as Nazis, or antifa doing the same. Then it's a matter of using any vehicle to deplatform anyone that is simply banned under Reddit's dangerous individuals policy.
[ + ] HughBriss
[ - ] HughBriss 2 points 3.9 yearsJun 13, 2021 08:50:35 ago (+2/-0)
[ + ] Joe_McCarthy
[ - ] Joe_McCarthy -1 points 3.9 yearsJun 13, 2021 08:55:08 ago (+1/-2)
[ + ] HughBriss
[ - ] HughBriss 2 points 3.9 yearsJun 13, 2021 08:56:10 ago (+2/-0)
[ + ] Joe_McCarthy
[ - ] Joe_McCarthy -1 points 3.9 yearsJun 13, 2021 09:03:36 ago (+1/-2)
[ + ] HughBriss
[ - ] HughBriss 0 points 3.9 yearsJun 13, 2021 10:22:57 ago (+0/-0)
That was editorial, and it didn't answer my question. Try again.
1) What's wrong with identifying with the ideals of the German National Socialists?
2) jews are, by their own admission, enemies of the White race. Why does recognizing our enemy make that "goofball jew paranoia"?
[ + ] Joe_McCarthy
[ - ] Joe_McCarthy 1 point 3.9 yearsJun 13, 2021 10:35:20 ago (+1/-0)*
Jews though are a mixed bag. Even at their worst they are not as dangerous or powerful as you think they are. And they are just one group that is problematic. A secondary one at that to the extent they should be spoken of monolithically at all.
If I told you the US Conference of Catholic Bishops is the largest refugee resettlement group in the US would you state baldly that Catholics are the enemies of the white race? Your approach lacks any real direction. And you don't know Jews when you see them, or don't see them such as in my case. Ya know, part of that goofball Jew paranoia I told you about.
[ + ] account deleted by user
[ - ] account deleted by user 0 points 3.9 yearsJun 13, 2021 10:48:42 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] PuttitoutIsGone
[ - ] PuttitoutIsGone 0 points 3.9 yearsJun 12, 2021 17:48:00 ago (+2/-2)
[ + ] Joe_McCarthy
[ - ] Joe_McCarthy -5 points 3.9 yearsJun 12, 2021 17:50:49 ago (+5/-10)
[ + ] Nosferatjew
[ - ] Nosferatjew 5 points 3.9 yearsJun 13, 2021 01:27:41 ago (+5/-0)