×
Login Register an account
Top Submissions Explore Upgoat Search Random Subverse Random Post Colorize! Site Rules
15
7 comments block


[ - ] YamaMaya 5 points 2.9 yearsJun 8, 2021 04:33:22 ago (+5/-0)*

I only started questioning this shit when I had a kid, and they wanted to put no less than 7 jabs in my 8 week old baby. I cant believe how much of a sacred cow jabs are and how hard it is to even FIND information to the contrary of "TAKE YOUR JABS LIKE A GOOD CITIZEN"

Theres also a concerted effort to supress anyone who speaks out or questions them online in the major social media spaces. People are mocked or condemned for choosing to not vaccinate like good little goyim, and those who suffer with a potato child from a vaccine reaction are harshly silenced and made to look like crazys who cant accept their kid was born retarded.

[ - ] account deleted by user 5 points 2.9 yearsJun 7, 2021 23:21:28 ago (+5/-0)*

account deleted by user

[ - ] Xigbar68 [op] 2 points 2.9 yearsJun 7, 2021 23:29:19 ago (+2/-0)

No mention of Jew on his wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_R._Redfield

I'm inclined to agree with you though that he looks Jewish. That and the (((Roth))) / red part of his name.

[ - ] account deleted by user 3 points 2.9 yearsJun 7, 2021 23:30:48 ago (+3/-0)*

account deleted by user

[ - ] Broc_Liath 1 point 2.9 yearsJun 8, 2021 09:35:43 ago (+1/-0)

I'm also suspicious of Fitzgerald: It's an anglo-irish surname, but american jews often shapeshift as Irish because they're the "safe" whites who until recently weren't blamed for colonialism. The irony of picking a name associated with norman colonists was probably lost on them.

Name means "son of the spearbearer" btw.

[ - ] AngryWhiteKeyboardWarrior 0 points 2.9 yearsJun 8, 2021 04:45:34 ago (+0/-0)

Regardless of Salk being a kike, I still consider his polio vaccine to be one of the best medical advances of the 20th century. Sabin's oral polio vaccine on the other hand, I find to be a lot more questionable, as it has on many occasions actually infected people with polio.

I don't really know any negatives regarding the smallpox and measles vaccines.

[ - ] qwop 2 points 2.9 yearsJun 8, 2021 07:55:09 ago (+2/-0)*

Perhaps you haven't seen this:
https://vaccinetruth.org/polio-vaccines.html

"Polio was already declining in the U.S. and Europe during the 40's and 50's, as well as in England, where polio mortalities was at its height in 1950, but had declined 82 percent by 1956, before the Salk vaccinations began there. There was also no polio epidemic in the Third-World, where only 10 per cent of the population had been vaccinated. But the Public Health Service and the March Of Dimes campaign swelled the statistics by combining the larger numbers of non-paralytic, "unspecified" and "abortive" polio cases, with the dwindling numbers of paralytic cases. Almost two-thirds of this total comprised the milder, "non-paralytic" type. In the minds of millions of people—then and now—polio had meant paralysis. But by combining paralytic cases with the various milder, non-paralytic forms, the public was misled into thinking that paralysis was sweeping the land.

Paralysis started to rise only after the Salk vaccine had begun in April 1955. It proved to be so hazardous that by November 1955, all European countries, with the exception of Denmark, had cancelled or discontinued their Salk vaccine programs. Canada postponed its Salk vaccine program July 29th of that year. In the U.S., Newark, N.J. stopped inoculations in June, 1955, while Idaho and Utah took similar action in July, followed shortly by Massachusetts [Morris Beale's American Capsule News, Oct. 15th, 1955]. By January 1, 1957, 17 states had rejected their supplies of Salk polio vaccine. During that year, the NY Times reported that very nearly half the paralytic cases, and three-quarters of the non-paralytic cases in children between the ages of 5 and 14 years occurred in vaccinated children. After two years of Salk vaccinations, paralytic polio increased nationally about 50% from 1957 to 1958, and about 80% from 1958 to 1959.

The attempt to hide the rise in paralysis occurred after 1955, when viral analysis of coxsackie virus infection and septic meningitis made them distinguishable from paralytic poliomyelitis. But if they had continued to be counted together as a single "polio" disease, it would have showed that paralytic polio increased nationally about 50% from 1957 to 1958, and about 80% from 1958 to 1959—two years into the Salk vaccination campaign. In addition to these two polio "twins", there were actually 170 other diseases with "polio-like" symptoms, with names like, spinal meningitis, inhibitory palsy, epidemic cholera, cholera morbus, ergotism, famine fever, billious remittent fever, spinal apoplexy, scurvy, berri-berri, pellagra, acidosis, etc. Each were very likely classified as "polio" during the frenzy prior to 1955. After 1955, NON-paralytic polio also acquired a new name. It wasn't until the mid-1950's that new laboratory techniques of culturing viruses could distinguish THIS polio from its clinical twin, aseptic meningitis. Before 1960, not a single case of "aseptic meningitis" was reported. Then, it was called (non-paralytic) "polio", and nationally had totaled 70,083 between 1951 and 1960. But from 1961 to 1992, there had been 220,365 cases of aseptic meningitis. There were only 589 cases of non-paralytic polio from 1961 to 1982. Not a single case has been reported since. Non-paralytic polio may have "disappeared". But thousands of children still experience the same symptoms as non-paralytic polio every year. Except now, it goes by another name."

Dr. Viera Scheibner, a Principal Research Scientist (Retired) in Australia and noted critic of vaccination, wrote in 1999:

"Polio has not been eradicated by vaccination, it is lurking behind a redefinition and new diagnostic names like viral or aseptic meningitis. When the first, injectable, polio vaccine was tested on some 1.8 million children in the United States in 1954, within 9 days there was huge epidemic of paralytic polio in the vaccinated and some of their parents and other contacts. The US Surgeon General discontinued the trial for 2 weeks. The vaccinators then put their heads together and came back with a new definition of poliomyelitis. The old, classical, definition: a disease with residual paralysis which resolves within 60 days has been changed to a disease with residual paralysis which persists for more than 60 days. Knowing the reality of polio disease, this nifty but dishonest administrative move excluded more than 90% of polio cases from the definition of polio. Ever since then, when a polio-vaccinated person gets polio, it will not be diagnosed as polio, it will be diagnosed as viral or aseptic meningitis. According to one of the 1997 issues of the MMWR, there are some 30,000 to 50,000 cases of viral meningitis per year in the United States alone. That's where all those 30,000—50,000 cases of polio disappeared after the introduction of mass vaccination."