☰
×
Login Register an account
Top Submissions Explore Upgoat Search Random Subverse Random Post Colorize! Site Rules
12

Vaccine 2.0 theory

submitted by Bird_Facts to fakepandemic 3 yearsMay 16, 2021 08:11:46 ago (+12/-0)     (fakepandemic)

We're seeing reports now of people contracting covid despite being vaccinated.

https://www.aol.com/lifestyle/cdc-reports-5-800-breakthrough-173107314.html

Even famous people- Bill Maher
https://nypost.com/2021/05/13/bill-maher-contracts-covid-despite-being-vaccinated/

At the church I stopped going to, the worship leader got his shot and then caught covid along with his family. But he still pressured the pastor to get his shot anyways.

How long before other people start "catching" covid despite their vaccine, and figure out the first round is a dud?

Not long, which is why I suspect they'll be rolling out a "new and improved" treatment which will
1) continue to pad the pockets of the (((industry)) and
2) contain more harmful chemicals, nanobots and whatever else they have in that cocktail of death.

Also they will probably blame the unvaccinated for making the virus mutate...hence the need for more shots, lockdowns, and so on.



18 comments block

sort by: hot new top old low

[ - ] Armiger 3 points 3 yearsMay 16, 2021 12:34:19 ago (+3/-0)

All deaths will be blamed on the unvaccinated.

The people who will wake up to this horseshit already have - the rest are literally cult members and they won't make it past their indoctrination.

[ - ] Bird_Facts [op] 0 points 3 yearsMay 17, 2021 11:08:14 ago (+0/-0)

We can't underestimate the power of repetitive media programming on otherwise skeptical people. I'm referring to family members who were into conspiracies before I was born, or who were injured by medical malpractice, who still believed the message. Even people in the Church, who say that they have faith in God's provision, went ahead with the shot and encouraged others to do the same. The guy in question is a white refugee from South Africa!

[ - ] Yargiyankooli 3 points 3 yearsMay 16, 2021 08:40:16 ago (+3/-0)

I feel they do not even need to brand it as a 2.0, they just need booster shots. No one knows what these vaccines are and who knows if they change which "ingredients" are in them over time.

[ - ] x0x7 2 points 3 yearsMay 16, 2021 10:05:54 ago (+2/-0)

Oh, they'll know, and they will brag about it, and nerd out over articles they don't understand. "Did you hear that the new boosters have blablablabla, [insert feign of sentimentality], now we just need the anti-vaxxers to do the thing and this will finally be over, [insert 5 seconds' hate]"

[ - ] Bird_Facts [op] 0 points 3 yearsMay 17, 2021 11:14:18 ago (+0/-0)

Not even fiction > a buddy told me he was excited to party this summer now that everyone was getting the shot, and he got his so he could date a girl from NYC who promptly ghosted him.

[ - ] Bird_Facts [op] 0 points 3 yearsMay 16, 2021 11:28:07 ago (+0/-0)

Branding as a 2.0 would be admitting the first one is a dud, and they would never admit fault. Booster shots it is.

[ - ] sculptor_and_statue 2 points 3 yearsMay 16, 2021 14:51:48 ago (+2/-0)

I've been wondering for a while if maybe the primary purpose of the "vaccines" they've already been injecting is to build obedience and get people used to the idea of getting injected with questionable substances on command, with the real payload to be delivered later, once they're sure that enough people will accept it.

[ - ] Bird_Facts [op] 1 point 3 yearsMay 17, 2021 07:56:02 ago (+1/-0)

I thought about that possibility too, that maybe this first round is benign compared to what they'll bring out later. But if you recall their previous MO up until now, their tactics rely on plausible deniability. Especially with the vaccines, their product needs a delay between being administered and injuring you or people would notice and they wouldn't get the percent compliance they want.

[ - ] Ozark 1 point 3 yearsMay 16, 2021 08:46:15 ago (+1/-0)

[ - ] Bird_Facts [op] 1 point 3 yearsMay 16, 2021 11:32:45 ago (+1/-0)

Thanks, I hadn't seen that. A coworker got his second dose, then out of work for 4 days with a >103 fever. Yet others are still lining up to get theirs. Baffling.

[ - ] deleted 0 points 3 yearsMay 17, 2021 04:33:23 ago (+0/-0)

deleted

[ - ] Bird_Facts [op] 0 points 3 yearsMay 17, 2021 11:16:54 ago (+0/-0)*

They also desensitized people to the most brutal violence, but it was okay to show because those zombies weren't people anymore. I doubt the subconscious can tell the difference.

[ - ] cyclops1771 0 points 3 yearsMay 16, 2021 15:29:16 ago (+0/-0)

It is well documented that "leaky" vaccines is what causes more severe and dangerous strains.

Not just "Covid", but any "leaky" vaccine in the past has done this. It is why "leaky" vaccines are never approved by the FDA.

[ - ] AOUsYamaka 1 point 3 yearsMay 16, 2021 15:53:11 ago (+1/-0)

Define leaky. Haven’t heard this before.

[ - ] cyclops1771 0 points 3 yearsMay 16, 2021 22:13:12 ago (+0/-0)*

Leaky means they reduce symptoms but people can still be infected by the viruses. Most human vaccines, such as for polio, and the measles, mumps and rubella (MMR) vaccine are perfect vaccines, so they also stop transmission of the disease in question.

Here is an article from 2015 in Newsweek. https://www.newsweek.com/leaky-vaccines-may-create-stronger-viruses-357575

It's not clear why some vaccines are leaky, but diseases where the body does a good job of creating lifelong immunity after a single exposure, such as for childhood diseases like measles, seem to be more suited to the development of perfect vaccines.

"Diseases for which natural immunity is not good — we have real trouble building these vaccines. That's because natural immunity is quite leaky, and we have trouble generating anything that's better than nature." -- Andrew Read, a disease ecologist at Pennsylvania State University in State College

[ - ] account deleted by user -3 points 3 yearsMay 16, 2021 10:03:36 ago (+0/-3)

account deleted by user

[ - ] Bird_Facts [op] 2 points 3 yearsMay 16, 2021 11:28:45 ago (+2/-0)

That's not how it's marketed. Sounds like convenient moving of the goal posts.

[ - ] account deleted by user 1 point 3 yearsMay 16, 2021 14:47:22 ago (+1/-0)

account deleted by user