[ - ] try 1 point 4.0 yearsMay 11, 2021 00:15:58 ago (+1/-0)*
The Planet PREFERS you eat meat, it uses less total resources from society. Jews lied about beef cost vs insect costs.
LEFTIST KIKE MYTH!
SCIENCE PROVED in 2017 and later that CHICKENS are 200% more protein per dollar to raise than any known insect or worm!
This includes: crickets, cockroaches, and earthworms.
Even before 2017, in 2015, early cricket research proved chickens were more efficient way to create animal protein for human consumption (measured in dollars of food used) : 2015 :
Chickens killed at a specific age, are 200% more protein yield from cracked corn, calcium mineral powder and water, THAN ANY KNOWN INSECT or WORM.
This is not debatable any longer but proven from research.
scrounging for INSECTS ARE FOR RETARDED CULTURES UNAWARE OF MODERN CHICKENS or lacking feed for chickens.
Chickens will not eat some forms of foul smelling garbage and feces that cockroaches will eat, but I am talking about sustainable agro business.
Worms, Crickets, and Cockroaches yield LESS protein per dollar of crushed corn , water, and calcium powder, vs a young chicken.
Nobody knows where the myth that insects yield more protein per dollar spent originated.
Some think this old wives tale may take a long time for science facts to extinguish, no matter how many papers prove superiority of chicken.
In theory... a plant substitute of legumes combined with corn would be cheaper than chicken protein, if access to 'free' sunlight. But vegetarian protein is for mexican beaners to live on. I like steak and sometimes chicken tendies on the floor next to my videogaming chair.
(((Bernie Sanders))) wants WHITE AMERICANS TO EAT INSECTS and to tax chicken and tax beef, if not eaten for cultural exemption reasons.
Beef eating while younger prevents IQ loss.
Beef eating REMOVES net carbon from air, though carbon dioxide is not a pollutant anyways.
A new study has just come out from Michigan State:
Impacts of soil carbon sequestration on life cycle greenhouse gas emissions in Midwestern USA beef finishing systems was just published in Agricultural Systems. The researchers tracked carbon sequestration over four years.
Across-farm soil organic carbon (SOC) data showed a 4-year C sequestration rate of 3.59 Mg C ha−1 yr−1in AMP grazed pastures. After including SOC in the GHG footprint estimates, finishing emissions from the AMP system were reduced from 9.62 to −6.65 kg CO2-e kg carcass weight (CW)−1, whereas feed-lot (FL) emissions increased slightly from 6.09 to 6.12 kg CO2-e kg CW−1 due to soil erosion. This indicates that AMP grazing has the potential to offset GHG emissions through soil C sequestration, and therefore the finishing phase could be a net C sink.
I used to be very green and concerned about the environment and I watched what I did to have less of an impact on the planet. While I did I watched all those around me that talked about it and the sacrifices they made. Strange that the people that talk the loudest do the least.
Now I don't do shit. In their eyes I have stored up more than my share of carbon offsets to dump radioactive waste down the sewer every day of my life.
They'll have to market it better than that if they want people to actually do it.
No one is going to drink "fly larvae milk" to "save the planet".
It's like the red food coloring made from crushed bugs. You don't look at the ingredients and see "crushed insects", you just see a food coloring listed. I think they'd have to create an appealing sounding name for insect meat products or something. And even then, it's still going to be a hard sell.
[ + ] account deleted by user
[ - ] account deleted by user [op] 9 points 4.0 yearsMay 10, 2021 20:50:25 ago (+9/-0)
[ + ] Aze
[ - ] Aze 5 points 4.0 yearsMay 10, 2021 21:00:27 ago (+6/-1)
War is the only hope we have.
[ + ] Teefinyomouf
[ - ] Teefinyomouf 4 points 4.0 yearsMay 10, 2021 22:29:33 ago (+4/-0)
[ + ] lord_nougat
[ - ] lord_nougat 4 points 4.0 yearsMay 10, 2021 21:24:57 ago (+4/-0)
[ + ] account deleted by user
[ - ] account deleted by user [op] 2 points 4.0 yearsMay 10, 2021 21:43:14 ago (+2/-0)
[ + ] lord_nougat
[ - ] lord_nougat 2 points 4.0 yearsMay 10, 2021 21:44:05 ago (+2/-0)
[ + ] bewaryofbug
[ - ] bewaryofbug 4 points 4.0 yearsMay 11, 2021 01:00:52 ago (+4/-0)
be wary of bug
[ + ] Deleted
[ - ] deleted 4 points 4.0 yearsMay 10, 2021 23:25:39 ago (+4/-0)
[ + ] try
[ - ] try 1 point 4.0 yearsMay 11, 2021 00:15:58 ago (+1/-0)*
LEFTIST KIKE MYTH!
SCIENCE PROVED in 2017 and later that CHICKENS are 200% more protein per dollar to raise than any known insect or worm!
This includes: crickets, cockroaches, and earthworms.
Even before 2017, in 2015, early cricket research proved chickens were more efficient way to create animal protein for human consumption (measured in dollars of food used) : 2015 :
https://entomologytoday.org/2015/04/15/crickets-are-not-a-free-lunch-protein-conversion-rates-may-be-overestimated/
Chickens killed at a specific age, are 200% more protein yield from cracked corn, calcium mineral powder and water, THAN ANY KNOWN INSECT or WORM.
This is not debatable any longer but proven from research.
scrounging for INSECTS ARE FOR RETARDED CULTURES UNAWARE OF MODERN CHICKENS or lacking feed for chickens.
Chickens will not eat some forms of foul smelling garbage and feces that cockroaches will eat, but I am talking about sustainable agro business.
Worms, Crickets, and Cockroaches yield LESS protein per dollar of crushed corn , water, and calcium powder, vs a young chicken.
Nobody knows where the myth that insects yield more protein per dollar spent originated.
Some think this old wives tale may take a long time for science facts to extinguish, no matter how many papers prove superiority of chicken.
In theory... a plant substitute of legumes combined with corn would be cheaper than chicken protein, if access to 'free' sunlight. But vegetarian protein is for mexican beaners to live on. I like steak and sometimes chicken tendies on the floor next to my videogaming chair.
(((Bernie Sanders))) wants WHITE AMERICANS TO EAT INSECTS and to tax chicken and tax beef, if not eaten for cultural exemption reasons.
Beef eating while younger prevents IQ loss.
Beef eating REMOVES net carbon from air, though carbon dioxide is not a pollutant anyways.
A new study has just come out from Michigan State:
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2018.02.003
Impacts of soil carbon sequestration on life cycle greenhouse gas emissions in Midwestern USA beef finishing systems was just published in Agricultural Systems.
The researchers tracked carbon sequestration over four years.
From paper : https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308521X17310338
Beef improves the Earth, and Chickens take less resources to create a gram of protein than any known raised insect.
Asshole (((socialists))) want to take away Whitey's cheeseburgers.
[ + ] account deleted by user
[ - ] account deleted by user [op] 1 point 4.0 yearsMay 10, 2021 23:51:31 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] NuckFiggers
[ - ] NuckFiggers 1 point 4.0 yearsMay 10, 2021 23:21:18 ago (+1/-0)
Now I don't do shit. In their eyes I have stored up more than my share of carbon offsets to dump radioactive waste down the sewer every day of my life.
[ + ] lord_nougat
[ - ] lord_nougat 1 point 4.0 yearsMay 10, 2021 21:24:21 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] dalai_llama
[ - ] dalai_llama 0 points 4.0 yearsMay 11, 2021 14:44:24 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] Teefinyomouf
[ - ] Teefinyomouf 0 points 4.0 yearsMay 11, 2021 09:17:07 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] AngryWhiteKeyboardWarrior
[ - ] AngryWhiteKeyboardWarrior 0 points 4.0 yearsMay 11, 2021 00:12:27 ago (+0/-0)
No one is going to drink "fly larvae milk" to "save the planet".
It's like the red food coloring made from crushed bugs. You don't look at the ingredients and see "crushed insects", you just see a food coloring listed. I think they'd have to create an appealing sounding name for insect meat products or something. And even then, it's still going to be a hard sell.
[ + ] GottaGasEmAll
[ - ] GottaGasEmAll 0 points 4.0 yearsMay 10, 2021 22:06:42 ago (+0/-0)