×
Login Register an account
Top Submissions Explore Upgoat Search Random Subverse Random Post Colorize! Site Rules
4
9 comments block


[ - ] account deleted by user 1 point 3.1 yearsApr 5, 2021 17:14:50 ago (+1/-0)*

account deleted by user

[ - ] Ducktalesooo000ooo 0 points 3.1 yearsApr 5, 2021 12:48:27 ago (+0/-0)

plus face worms

[ - ] account deleted by user -2 points 3.1 yearsApr 5, 2021 13:57:41 ago (+0/-2)

account deleted by user

[ - ] qwop [op] 2 points 3.1 yearsApr 5, 2021 14:09:58 ago (+2/-0)

What's with the uppity attitude? I would instead appreciate if you told me what the deal was.

[ - ] account deleted by user -2 points 3.1 yearsApr 5, 2021 14:19:30 ago (+0/-2)

account deleted by user

[ - ] Ducktalesooo000ooo 2 points 3.1 yearsApr 5, 2021 14:43:58 ago (+2/-0)

you mean like J&J did with baby powder?

[ - ] account deleted by user 0 points 3.1 yearsApr 5, 2021 16:33:38 ago (+0/-0)

account deleted by user

[ - ] Ducktalesooo000ooo 0 points 3.1 yearsApr 5, 2021 17:02:03 ago (+0/-0)

i think they don't weigh consequences like you or I do.

3-M could probably afford a 100 million fine... just like J&J.

[ - ] qwop [op] 0 points 3.1 yearsApr 5, 2021 17:10:19 ago (+0/-0)

Most of the cheap surgical masks do not come from 3M. What do you think they have some sort of surgical mask monopoly?

Almost all of the masks come from China or other cheap manufacturers, and that is the source of the issues raised in the article.

Read for yourself. This is from Yahoo news Canada:

"Potentially toxic masks distributed in schools and daycares in Quebec":
https://ca.news.yahoo.com/news/potentially-toxic-masks-distributed-schools-231331868.html

Guess where those masks were bough from?