See right here how black people can be our ally, They can easily beat the fuck out of globohomo and then just call them racist which is actually effective against them.
If Hitler had 1 more ally of any influence at all, we’d all be speaking German, and half of us would have been born on mars and on route to alpha Centauri right now.
half of us would have been born on mars and on route to alpha Centauri right now.
Just a reminder that, although this fantasy sounds nice, it would have been an impossibility. Don't forget that we are essentially imprisoned by our radiation belts, and that, upon their discovery prior to the first 'Moon landings', the usual suspects decided to detonate a nuke inside the belts, creating A THIRD VAN-ALLEN BELT. Links: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Starfish_Primehttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Van_Allen_radiation_belt
We'd probably have a cool flying car or entire civilizations on the water, however.
Van Allen himself has said that the belts were not a problem for the Apollo trajectories. So it's nice of you to reference the belts which he discovered, and which he also confirmed that humans can safely travel through.
Van Allen himself has said that the belts were not a problem for the Apollo trajectories.
They were just discovered in the 60s - they weren't characterized until decades later. It took sending a long series of probes through it to do this. He couldn't have known their energies or sizes, and remember STARFISH PRIME was literally the same year as the announcement.
were not a problem for the Apollo trajectories.
I forgot there are some kids who don't know better. Short version: it simply wasn't possible to go to the Moon with 60s technology. The most authoritative sources will be either the late Dave McGowan or Miles Mathis.
The thing is, you can not just point a radio telescope arbitrarily somewhere and expect to pick up stray signals. You have to point it exactly in the direction of what you want to listen to. They pointed it at the moon, and received Apollo telemetry and TV signals.
Bochum is a private observatory with no affiliations to NASA, and the whole effort was done as a private scientific experiment at the time.
For as long as I have followed this moon hoaxing rhetoric, I have yet to hear anyone discuss those recordings.
Argument by authority. Why do you give Van Allen the last word on the subject? He's not some gatekeeper like the Wizard of Oz, the one and only person who can pronounce on the phenomenon. So he discovered them. Big deal. We've had a long to time to study them and it's been demonstrated definitively that humans cannot safely pass through them.
When we were competing with the Soviet Union in getting to the moon, they realized early that not only was 60s technology insufficient for sending men to the moon and back, but the radiation fields were insuperable. These two reasons, and only these reasons, are why they didn't put a man on the moon.
It was a teachable moment; the biggest thing destroyed from our civilization is our love and thirst for learning - our intellectualism. Pre-Weimar, Germany was the hub and forefront of knowledge in all subject matters on the planet, after all. Fast forward 120 years, and the world is unrecognizable.
Also, it wasn't humor; a thin attempt at false nostalgia, maybe.
This is the kind of thing that we need to see more of. When blacks turn on the gays, they'll pretty much realize that they have no allies and that the gravy train of legal aid to these faggots is pretty much going to dry up one day. It's unbelievable the amount of benefits and claims that gay people can get when they declare themselves gay publicly. People are so scared of offending homosexuals now that no one stops their bullshit by throwing it directly back into their faces. Look at how homosexuals really treat people who oppose their ideas. They don't want acceptance; that was never the issue. It's always been about dominance. The second one person doesn't stand up to aid in their delusion, suddenly, it's okay to call them stupid bigots and say that America is fucked up and that there's proof that they were born gay. When you oppose their beliefs, you've crossed the line into being their hated enemies; this is why you don't give faggots any special treatment or legal powers. I said it before on old Voat and I'll say it again, faggots are the worst of both genders. They're all the worst thoughts of a woman shoved into a male body.
Lately, though, I've been thinking about how absurd the situation is with them when I want to try to insult homosexuals. You can't really say "fuck you." You can't tell them to go and fuck themselves because they'd probably try or find a way. Is the proper way to insult gays to tell them "go fuck a woman and enjoy it?"
Jesus fuck, who takes time out of their day to argue with a guy with a sign? It's real life, if you piss of a nigger you don't get downvoated, you get beat down.
If you’re going to engage them, ask all the questions and NEVER let them get away without answering it. Not once! Force them to speak their stupidity out loud and make that the content of the exchange.
The (((globalists)) are trying to push homo really hard in Africa. I would say theyve made a lot of inroads with more affluent women. African men really hate fags though.
Where I would disagree with him though is that behavior is inborn, to a very large extent.
There are genes that make us feel revulsion toward gay because it is useful for a society to shun gay behavior. â€Homophobia†is not a pathology. Its an instinct that confers survival. Homosexuality is not a useful behavior.
Early humans were not monogamists. Monogamy developed in some societies as a survival strategy, but not in others. So one man one woman is not universal. But these are genetic traits. Entire groups of people are bred for monogamy.
I swear to god you are as bad as the feminists. When will you get that this is evolution, its not about your broken heart or whatever. I hope you dont believe that white males are biologically somehow not hypergamous either. Male “scheme” for the highest value female they can land. Which is typically the best looking young woman available. This is from a purely mercenary motive, reproduction.
Females are individuals competing within evolution for reproductive success. They arent fucking barbie dolls to sit their looking good and being virtuous. They must secure reproductive success or perish.
You want women to quit their jobs and depend on men fully financially yes? But that will only be a greater incentive for females to marry hypergamously for money. You do understand how that works right? Why do you have to be such a baby. Its fucking evolution.
but she doesnt love me for my soul
Men want women for their looks, basically reproductive potential. You dont hear me bitching about it. You have a highly mercenary utilitarian attitude toward women. But you fault any hint of the same motives as a flaw of the female species. This shows a total lack of self awareness and is also gay.
You seem to think hypergamy doesnt apply when males are pursueing women who are more attractive or younger than them.
Hypergamy means that the creature is always looking for something more.
Great. You literally just described every living being in an evolutionary context. I keep saying this over and over. Men wanting attractive young women to bear them children is not any more virtuous an impulse than females that want a wealthy male to support their children. ITS THE SAME THING. Its really not personal. Its evolution. Why do you expect women to go against their own interests?
Men are fine with some 5/10 girl and will settle with them.
Apparantly not. When they can. males hoard multiple females. Its called polygamy. Men dont settle. When they can get multiple women as Mel Gibson or Donald trump have, they do. Its not very egalitarian of them.
Monogamy is a power sharing agreement between males of a society. Males must strike a baragain to limit themselves to one female, even “alphas”. Reproductive strategies change as a result of this and the changes are gene based. Males become less violent toward each other. They hoard wealth less because theres less of a reproductive payoff. Males become economically more productive. Males compete through displays of chivalry. Males are more attentive toward their wives and children. Females rise in status. Etc. Basically, white people stuff.
The monogamy bargain must be re-established between white males. No more excusing philandering or divorce, because that is just more polygamy. If we dont re-establish monogamy, white males will begin to be selected for more muzzie traits, get it?
Stop blaming polygamy all on females. Polygamist males are also “breaking the rules” . Males are hoarding females. It turns out all of western civilization is based on males not being sluts. All of islamic civiliation is based on males being sluts and only males being sluts, while women are hidden under sheets. African civiliztion is based on everyone being sluts because there is no wealth so establishing paternity is unimportant. So now you understand it all.
You are very emotional and biased about this stuff. This is science. Just realize this stuff all works like clockwork according to game theory principles. You perpetually have your panties in a wad over evil females. Get over it.
There are plenty of smart black people, even if 70% are retarded. Now, consider how shitty is to be a smart black person dealing with other black people all the time? They're always woke, in my experience.
There are some that have high IQ and are top 1% chess and checkers players. They can earning a living and participate in society, but the welfare state rewards their stupid relatives instead.
Those who don't have ears to hear are waste of time. No point in arguing with someone who doesn't understand reason. It's like arguing with a 4 year old.
[ + ] Poo_on_a_Jew
[ - ] Poo_on_a_Jew 0 points 3 yearsMay 11, 2021 02:03:43 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] CaptLukeNotaras
[ - ] CaptLukeNotaras 2 points 3.1 yearsApr 7, 2021 22:13:47 ago (+2/-0)
[ + ] whostolemyusername
[ - ] whostolemyusername 13 points 3.1 yearsApr 4, 2021 15:52:21 ago (+13/-0)
See right here how black people can be our ally, They can easily beat the fuck out of globohomo and then just call them racist which is actually effective against them.
[ + ] 3Whuurs
[ - ] 3Whuurs 6 points 3.1 yearsApr 4, 2021 23:36:27 ago (+6/-0)
[ + ] aleleopathic
[ - ] aleleopathic 0 points 3.1 yearsApr 5, 2021 05:09:52 ago (+2/-2)
Just a reminder that, although this fantasy sounds nice, it would have been an impossibility. Don't forget that we are essentially imprisoned by our radiation belts, and that, upon their discovery prior to the first 'Moon landings', the usual suspects decided to detonate a nuke inside the belts, creating A THIRD VAN-ALLEN BELT. Links: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Starfish_Prime https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Van_Allen_radiation_belt
We'd probably have a cool flying car or entire civilizations on the water, however.
[ + ] qwop
[ - ] qwop 0 points 3.1 yearsApr 5, 2021 06:53:11 ago (+1/-1)*
[ + ] aleleopathic
[ - ] aleleopathic 2 points 3.1 yearsApr 5, 2021 12:59:07 ago (+2/-0)
They were just discovered in the 60s - they weren't characterized until decades later. It took sending a long series of probes through it to do this. He couldn't have known their energies or sizes, and remember STARFISH PRIME was literally the same year as the announcement.
I forgot there are some kids who don't know better. Short version: it simply wasn't possible to go to the Moon with 60s technology. The most authoritative sources will be either the late Dave McGowan or Miles Mathis.
Dave McGowan: http://centerforaninformedamerica.com/moondoggie/
Mathis is scattered across a few papers, but this one to start: http://mileswmathis.com/ammoon.pdf
[ + ] qwop
[ - ] qwop 1 point 3.1 yearsApr 5, 2021 17:35:20 ago (+1/-0)*
https://i.imgur.com/BqHwyHC.jpg
And what about the Apollo recordings from the Bochum radio observatory in Germany.
https://honeysucklecreek.net/other_stations/bochum/main.html
The thing is, you can not just point a radio telescope arbitrarily somewhere and expect to pick up stray signals. You have to point it exactly in the direction of what you want to listen to. They pointed it at the moon, and received Apollo telemetry and TV signals.
Bochum is a private observatory with no affiliations to NASA, and the whole effort was done as a private scientific experiment at the time.
For as long as I have followed this moon hoaxing rhetoric, I have yet to hear anyone discuss those recordings.
[ + ] HughBriss
[ - ] HughBriss 2 points 3.1 yearsApr 8, 2021 14:43:25 ago (+2/-0)
When we were competing with the Soviet Union in getting to the moon, they realized early that not only was 60s technology insufficient for sending men to the moon and back, but the radiation fields were insuperable. These two reasons, and only these reasons, are why they didn't put a man on the moon.
[ + ] heygeorge
[ - ] heygeorge 0 points 3.1 yearsApr 5, 2021 06:58:11 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] aleleopathic
[ - ] aleleopathic 1 point 3.1 yearsApr 5, 2021 12:59:25 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] binrobinrro
[ - ] binrobinrro 0 points 3 yearsMay 1, 2021 23:06:03 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] aleleopathic
[ - ] aleleopathic 0 points 3 yearsMay 2, 2021 01:37:55 ago (+0/-0)
Also, it wasn't humor; a thin attempt at false nostalgia, maybe.
[ + ] account deleted by user
[ - ] account deleted by user [op] 0 points 3 yearsApr 14, 2021 15:02:32 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] AlexanderMorose13
[ - ] AlexanderMorose13 13 points 3.1 yearsApr 4, 2021 08:43:11 ago (+13/-0)
Lately, though, I've been thinking about how absurd the situation is with them when I want to try to insult homosexuals. You can't really say "fuck you." You can't tell them to go and fuck themselves because they'd probably try or find a way. Is the proper way to insult gays to tell them "go fuck a woman and enjoy it?"
[ + ] account deleted by user
[ - ] account deleted by user [op] 7 points 3.1 yearsApr 4, 2021 12:36:03 ago (+7/-0)
[ + ] AlexanderMorose13
[ - ] AlexanderMorose13 1 point 3.1 yearsApr 4, 2021 12:50:29 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] PorchDrinks
[ - ] PorchDrinks 2 points 3.1 yearsApr 6, 2021 04:13:47 ago (+2/-0)
[ + ] account deleted by user
[ - ] account deleted by user [op] 6 points 3.1 yearsApr 4, 2021 13:27:30 ago (+6/-0)
[ + ] 3Whuurs
[ - ] 3Whuurs 3 points 3.1 yearsApr 4, 2021 23:20:31 ago (+3/-0)
[ + ] con77
[ - ] con77 5 points 3.1 yearsApr 4, 2021 08:13:11 ago (+5/-0)
[ + ] account deleted by user
[ - ] account deleted by user [op] 1 point 3.1 yearsApr 4, 2021 09:19:11 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] PostWallHelena
[ - ] PostWallHelena 1 point 3.1 yearsApr 4, 2021 08:18:43 ago (+2/-1)
[ + ]deleted
[ - ] deleted 4 points 3.1 yearsApr 4, 2021 11:38:25 ago (+4/-0)
[ + ] Spaceman84
[ - ] Spaceman84 3 points 3.1 yearsApr 4, 2021 16:03:37 ago (+3/-0)
[ + ] deleted
[ - ] deleted 1 point 3.1 yearsApr 4, 2021 17:07:47 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] 9000timesempty
[ - ] 9000timesempty 2 points 3.1 yearsApr 4, 2021 10:20:38 ago (+2/-0)
...no... You are the mockery.
[ + ] Cantaloupe
[ - ] Cantaloupe 3 points 3.1 yearsApr 4, 2021 13:25:09 ago (+3/-0)
[ + ] PostWallHelena
[ - ] PostWallHelena 2 points 3.1 yearsApr 4, 2021 08:16:06 ago (+3/-1)
Where I would disagree with him though is that behavior is inborn, to a very large extent.
There are genes that make us feel revulsion toward gay because it is useful for a society to shun gay behavior. â€Homophobia†is not a pathology. Its an instinct that confers survival. Homosexuality is not a useful behavior.
Early humans were not monogamists. Monogamy developed in some societies as a survival strategy, but not in others. So one man one woman is not universal. But these are genetic traits. Entire groups of people are bred for monogamy.
[ + ] Cantaloupe
[ - ] Cantaloupe 2 points 3.1 yearsApr 4, 2021 13:23:59 ago (+2/-0)
[ + ] PostWallHelena
[ - ] PostWallHelena 1 point 3.1 yearsApr 4, 2021 14:06:38 ago (+2/-1)
Being violent or hoarding resources does not have such a big payoff in a monogamous society because you can still only have one wife.
But violent/greedy polygamists can spread their genes around much more successfully. Those would be genes for violence, greed, horniness, etc.
On a totally unrelated topic why is the middle east such a mess?
[ + ] account deleted by user
[ - ] account deleted by user [op] -1 points 3.1 yearsApr 4, 2021 19:31:11 ago (+0/-1)
[ + ] PostWallHelena
[ - ] PostWallHelena 0 points 3.1 yearsApr 4, 2021 20:20:19 ago (+1/-1)*
I swear to god you are as bad as the feminists. When will you get that this is evolution, its not about your broken heart or whatever. I hope you dont believe that white males are biologically somehow not hypergamous either. Male “scheme” for the highest value female they can land. Which is typically the best looking young woman available. This is from a purely mercenary motive, reproduction.
Females are individuals competing within evolution for reproductive success. They arent fucking barbie dolls to sit their looking good and being virtuous. They must secure reproductive success or perish.
You want women to quit their jobs and depend on men fully financially yes? But that will only be a greater incentive for females to marry hypergamously for money. You do understand how that works right? Why do you have to be such a baby. Its fucking evolution.
Men want women for their looks, basically reproductive potential. You dont hear me bitching about it. You have a highly mercenary utilitarian attitude toward women. But you fault any hint of the same motives as a flaw of the female species. This shows a total lack of self awareness and is also gay.
[ + ] account deleted by user
[ - ] account deleted by user [op] 0 points 3.1 yearsApr 5, 2021 22:55:14 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] PostWallHelena
[ - ] PostWallHelena 1 point 3.1 yearsApr 6, 2021 00:17:28 ago (+1/-0)*
Great. You literally just described every living being in an evolutionary context. I keep saying this over and over. Men wanting attractive young women to bear them children is not any more virtuous an impulse than females that want a wealthy male to support their children. ITS THE SAME THING. Its really not personal. Its evolution. Why do you expect women to go against their own interests?
Apparantly not. When they can. males hoard multiple females. Its called polygamy. Men dont settle. When they can get multiple women as Mel Gibson or Donald trump have, they do. Its not very egalitarian of them.
Monogamy is a power sharing agreement between males of a society. Males must strike a baragain to limit themselves to one female, even “alphas”. Reproductive strategies change as a result of this and the changes are gene based. Males become less violent toward each other. They hoard wealth less because theres less of a reproductive payoff. Males become economically more productive. Males compete through displays of chivalry. Males are more attentive toward their wives and children. Females rise in status. Etc. Basically, white people stuff.
The monogamy bargain must be re-established between white males. No more excusing philandering or divorce, because that is just more polygamy. If we dont re-establish monogamy, white males will begin to be selected for more muzzie traits, get it?
Stop blaming polygamy all on females. Polygamist males are also “breaking the rules” . Males are hoarding females. It turns out all of western civilization is based on males not being sluts. All of islamic civiliation is based on males being sluts and only males being sluts, while women are hidden under sheets. African civiliztion is based on everyone being sluts because there is no wealth so establishing paternity is unimportant. So now you understand it all.
You are very emotional and biased about this stuff. This is science. Just realize this stuff all works like clockwork according to game theory principles. You perpetually have your panties in a wad over evil females. Get over it.
[ + ] MynxiMe
[ - ] MynxiMe 0 points 3.1 yearsApr 5, 2021 21:44:24 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] MynxiMe
[ - ] MynxiMe 0 points 3.1 yearsApr 5, 2021 21:43:29 ago (+0/-0)
I love logical minds, Skin color isn't a part of that.
[ + ] account deleted by user
[ - ] account deleted by user [op] 1 point 3.1 yearsApr 4, 2021 19:09:52 ago (+2/-1)
[ + ] account deleted by user
[ - ] account deleted by user [op] 1 point 3.1 yearsApr 4, 2021 14:42:36 ago (+1/-0)*
[ + ] Empire_of_the_Mind
[ - ] Empire_of_the_Mind 3 points 3.1 yearsApr 4, 2021 22:33:12 ago (+3/-0)
[ + ] deleted
[ - ] deleted 1 point 3.1 yearsApr 5, 2021 02:11:46 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] Teefinyomouf
[ - ] Teefinyomouf 1 point 3.1 yearsApr 5, 2021 08:28:56 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] Her0n
[ - ] Her0n 1 point 3.1 yearsApr 4, 2021 14:16:20 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] recon_johnny
[ - ] recon_johnny 1 point 3.1 yearsApr 4, 2021 11:14:29 ago (+1/-0)
When no-one can answer your questions, then perhaps you have the right approach.
[ + ] christianmusicreleases
[ - ] christianmusicreleases 0 points 3.1 yearsApr 5, 2021 02:35:17 ago (+1/-1)*
[ + ]deleted
[ - ] deleted 0 points 3.1 yearsApr 5, 2021 02:02:57 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] Empire_of_the_Mind
[ - ] Empire_of_the_Mind 0 points 3.1 yearsApr 4, 2021 22:31:58 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] drhitler
[ - ] drhitler 0 points 3.1 yearsApr 4, 2021 15:23:29 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] Empire_of_the_Mind
[ - ] Empire_of_the_Mind 2 points 3.1 yearsApr 4, 2021 22:34:11 ago (+2/-0)
[ + ] mattsixteen24
[ - ] mattsixteen24 0 points 3.1 yearsApr 4, 2021 15:11:45 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ]deleted
[ - ] deleted 0 points 3.1 yearsApr 4, 2021 12:18:06 ago (+0/-0)