Sign into an existing account

I wrote this once already, but somehow I was logged the fuck out when I hit submit, so here's the shit/speed version, as I'm just sharing my morning coffee thought/shitpost for the day.

Polygamy: Marriage to many 'spouses'
Polygyny: Man with multiple 'wives' <<< This one
Polyandry: Woman with multiple 'husbands' <<< Not this shit

Some points/counter-points(in no particular order):

Pro) Have more than one woman
Con) Have more than one woman
Pro) Have more kids/larger families faster
Pro) Deny resources (women) to soys and shitskins
Pro) Potentially easier sharing of household labor/time
Con) Could be predatory/socially net negative if conducted the same way FLDS does it. (Aka form a theocratic cult, excommunicate young/marriageable males and hoard all the women for older/senior members of the 'church')
Pro) If already 'married/SO'ed'--- could take on a widow (ideal) or divorcee/never married with kid(s) and raise those kid(s) in a stable household and raise them properly so ZOG can't brainwash/enslave them.
Probably the key point here is 'stable household' as any household that is unstable will fuck up your kids (monogamy or otherwise)
Potentially better than serial monogamy (aka getting married/divorced/remarried/divorced/etc--- and/or having kids in each of those relationships like many people currently do)
I don't see how polyandry is different than the single mom cock carousel and also (defacto) puts the pussy on a pedestal by limiting supply which is always a recipe for disaster.
Potentially will fuck-up any remaining legal protections to be had (eg: medical visitation) since you can't legally be married to more than one person-- not that there's a lot of those married legal benefits left anyway.
Potentially is a more attractive arrangement in a decaying/collapsed society as it increases security/stability.

Thoughts/points/counter-points?