Social acceptability as a standard for what AI can be allowed is a non-option...for US...unless WE...WE have...WE need..destroy US
a) Social implies an aggregation together; being implies separation apart from one another...using US (united states) and WE (we the people) implies ones acceptance of social (artificial) over partial (natural).
b) Your belief in standards represents the manufactured consent of many under few. Nature doesn't set standards for the adjustments of others, but gives each one free will of choice, which is what consent corrupts.
We need to identify the cores of philosophy that threaten to destroy us.
a) Identical implies "same"...being implies differentiated from one another. Suggested identity implies manufactured consent.
b) Being implies core (perception) within the apple (to apply) of knowledge (perceivable)...eating the apple by holding onto suggestions of one another tempts one to ignore perceivable knowledge. That's a SIN/SYN, hence synchronizing many alike, while permitting few apart... https://www.amazon.com/People-Apart-Europe-1789-1939-History/dp/0198219806
A jew synchronizes gentiles by manufacturing consent given to suggestions.
c) Phi (to love) Lo (logic) Sophy (knowledge)...all perceivable moving through each ones perception implies knowledge (sophy); ignoring perceivable for suggested establishes circular logic (lo) within self; which turns into conflicts of reason (love vs hate) against others.
Being implies within sophy...choosing philo (to love) or miso (to hate) entraps one within circular logic. Both loving and hating implies taking a bite out of the apple of knowledge, hence a sin aka synchronicity of many fighting each other within a conflict of reason (love vs hate).
ImplicationOverReason -2 points 4 hours ago
a) Social implies an aggregation together; being implies separation apart from one another...using US (united states) and WE (we the people) implies ones acceptance of social (artificial) over partial (natural).
b) Your belief in standards represents the manufactured consent of many under few. Nature doesn't set standards for the adjustments of others, but gives each one free will of choice, which is what consent corrupts.
a) Identical implies "same"...being implies differentiated from one another. Suggested identity implies manufactured consent.
b) Being implies core (perception) within the apple (to apply) of knowledge (perceivable)...eating the apple by holding onto suggestions of one another tempts one to ignore perceivable knowledge. That's a SIN/SYN, hence synchronizing many alike, while permitting few apart... https://www.amazon.com/People-Apart-Europe-1789-1939-History/dp/0198219806
A jew synchronizes gentiles by manufacturing consent given to suggestions.
c) Phi (to love) Lo (logic) Sophy (knowledge)...all perceivable moving through each ones perception implies knowledge (sophy); ignoring perceivable for suggested establishes circular logic (lo) within self; which turns into conflicts of reason (love vs hate) against others.
Being implies within sophy...choosing philo (to love) or miso (to hate) entraps one within circular logic. Both loving and hating implies taking a bite out of the apple of knowledge, hence a sin aka synchronicity of many fighting each other within a conflict of reason (love vs hate).