You use the same dismissive language as indoctrinated doctors and "scientists" use, which shows a lack of knowledge, in actually listening to the parents with injured kids.
Ive heard the parents with injured kids. They are the reason we should perform a randomized placebo controlled study. You cannot study this phenomenon quantitatively with “Ask any mother, who's healthy child regressed into a drooling mess right after a shot, “ You cannot. If you don’t know why anecdotal evidence is bad science, you don’t understand science.
You want the answers to be found in "the science", instead of paying attention to something that is right in front of your eyes.
Correct.
You can whitewash all you want, "not all niggers", "not all jews", "not all muslims", "not all vaccines", is the type of typical thinking that leads to unnecessary suffering. It prevents people from taking action.
All I want is the truth. And the truth is that its not all niggers and its not all jews. And sometimes its whites. And the reason why its difficult to predict who the “bad guy” is , is because we don’t properly understand the system we are studying (race, genetics, culture, politics) When we understand how the system truly works we can solve its problems. But you want with a false theory because you believe that pushing a falsehood (every single black, every single jew, every single vaccine) will get a better result. I don’t. It destroys our credibility for one.
Not enough text on a white paper from experts yet. That's what you are saying.
Not enough data. Data. Thats what I want. I. LIKE. DATA. It can be on paper, or a computer screen of cuneiform tablets for all I care. Its not a feeling. Its not a “smell” . Your method appears to be 100% emotion based and not quantitative at all. Thats not how you get to the bottom of things.
"WE DO NOT KNOW" - Don't lump me into your personal thought processes.
Im pretty confident that you have not unlocked the secrets of the immune system. You don’t know. I dont know. Somebody at Merck or the FDA might know but they ain’t talkin.
I just keep hearing you say things like “We don’t have time to study this problem. Just hang all vaccinologists. Lets go with our feeling. No need for messy facts!” This is what you seem to be implying. I don’t agree.
I have no doubt whatsoever, that vaccines are the major cause of the autism epidemic and many other ill effects.
Great. Prove it. Quantitatively. Whats the probability that I will develop autism if I get MMR or Hepatitis shots? 1 in 500? 1 in 5000? Wouldn’t you like to know. Everybody who had shots as a kid did not turn into a drooling regressed mess. They didn’t. Some shots like small pox seem to have eliminated their disease entirely. Some problems like childhood deafness seem to have been largely eliminated by certain vax programs. I observe and acknowlege these things because I try to maintain objectivity, which you are clearly failing at.
I have a nuanced position here. I don’t think all vaccines are evil. I think some might be useful in certain circumstances but that its probably overused as a tool and vaccination can cause injury. That is a measured approach and for some reason this makes you very angry. Im not a strong enough anti-vaxxer, apparently. I don’t care. We’re not talking about some theological argument like good works vs faith alone, or whatever. You have to collect data to know whats going on. This is obtainable data but for some reason you don’t want it because it might be complicated? We should just stick with vaxxes = satan? Eh.
PostWallHelena 0 points 1 week ago
Ive heard the parents with injured kids. They are the reason we should perform a randomized placebo controlled study. You cannot study this phenomenon quantitatively with “Ask any mother, who's healthy child regressed into a drooling mess right after a shot, “
You cannot. If you don’t know why anecdotal evidence is bad science, you don’t understand science.
Correct.
All I want is the truth. And the truth is that its not all niggers and its not all jews. And sometimes its whites. And the reason why its difficult to predict who the “bad guy” is , is because we don’t properly understand the system we are studying (race, genetics, culture, politics) When we understand how the system truly works we can solve its problems. But you want with a false theory because you believe that pushing a falsehood (every single black, every single jew, every single vaccine) will get a better result. I don’t. It destroys our credibility for one.
Not enough data. Data. Thats what I want. I. LIKE. DATA. It can be on paper, or a computer screen of cuneiform tablets for all I care. Its not a feeling. Its not a “smell” . Your method appears to be 100% emotion based and not quantitative at all. Thats not how you get to the bottom of things.
Im pretty confident that you have not unlocked the secrets of the immune system. You don’t know. I dont know. Somebody at Merck or the FDA might know but they ain’t talkin.
I just keep hearing you say things like “We don’t have time to study this problem. Just hang all vaccinologists. Lets go with our feeling. No need for messy facts!” This is what you seem to be implying. I don’t agree.
Great. Prove it. Quantitatively. Whats the probability that I will develop autism if I get MMR or Hepatitis shots? 1 in 500? 1 in 5000? Wouldn’t you like to know. Everybody who had shots as a kid did not turn into a drooling regressed mess. They didn’t. Some shots like small pox seem to have eliminated their disease entirely. Some problems like childhood deafness seem to have been largely eliminated by certain vax programs. I observe and acknowlege these things because I try to maintain objectivity, which you are clearly failing at.
I have a nuanced position here. I don’t think all vaccines are evil. I think some might be useful in certain circumstances but that its probably overused as a tool and vaccination can cause injury. That is a measured approach and for some reason this makes you very angry. Im not a strong enough anti-vaxxer, apparently. I don’t care. We’re not talking about some theological argument like good works vs faith alone, or whatever. You have to collect data to know whats going on. This is obtainable data but for some reason you don’t want it because it might be complicated? We should just stick with vaxxes = satan? Eh.