submitted by ProudRebel to WhitePeopleThings 3 monthsFeb 27, 2025 10:09:13 ago (+16/-0) (files.catbox.moe)
Sector2 0 points 3 months ago
Seems legally indefensible. The purpose is clearly to trick drivers into seeing objects on the pavement that aren't actually there. What happens when someone swerves to avoid the "obstruction" they've been tricked into seeing?
Sector2 0 points 3 months ago
Seems legally indefensible. The purpose is clearly to trick drivers into seeing objects on the pavement that aren't actually there. What happens when someone swerves to avoid the "obstruction" they've been tricked into seeing?