Large sections of the map are also missing, but don't have any key for data not acquired. There's also no date for the data, as well no explicit method for data collection. I.E. did they only take DNA samples from people native to the regions, or DNA samples from the territories as a whole.
Whoever gave you this gave you a shit graph. Just post a link to our conversation so they know how to adjust it.
Also map A has 51 groups listed, of which most have at least a dot of green or blue in, although it's hard to tell with blue because 1 pixel of blue on black is hard to see.
s23erdctfvyg 0 points 3 months ago
Large sections of the map are also missing, but don't have any key for data not acquired. There's also no date for the data, as well no explicit method for data collection. I.E. did they only take DNA samples from people native to the regions, or DNA samples from the territories as a whole.
Whoever gave you this gave you a shit graph. Just post a link to our conversation so they know how to adjust it.
Also map A has 51 groups listed, of which most have at least a dot of green or blue in, although it's hard to tell with blue because 1 pixel of blue on black is hard to see.