I was thinking about this.. We really shouldn't be happy with an election result because while Trump may be better domestically he does worship Israel more than Kamala does. So if we should be unhappy with either result what result should we be happy with, even if implausible?
If both Kamala and Trump had heart attacks tomorrow we likely still shouldn't be happy with the result because they would just hold a special election with new pro-Israel stooges and we'd be in the exact same situation.
But ultimately all action is human action, including the decision to hold another election and the effort of organizing it, and the selection of who the people would vote between.
If a perfect intellegence decided to cause all the heart attacks necessary (all happening tonight) such that by this time next year we do not have an Israeli-stooge president, what would that minimum number be?
We know it's a finite number because as a most extreme upper bound if it hit everyone in America but me that would work. There are less extreme upper bounds that are easy to find. So we could either work that upper bound down or the lower bound up.
Like do you think it would be possible for only 6 people to have a heart attack and us not have a stooge president?
Smedleys_Butler 0 points 5 months ago
He could've had help from the Catholic church. Who knows for sure