In 1750, [John Michell] published a paper on magnetism, introducing at least one entirely new law - the "inverse square law" - that furthered the application of magnets in navigation.
[In 1783], Michell deduced […] that it was also possible that the gravity of the most massive astral bodies might overpower their own light rays entirely. For a star to achieve this, it would need to be the same density as the Sun and about 500 times its size. Light would initially escape from such a star, perhaps making its way out to nearby orbiting planets but, Michell explained, "would be made to return towards it, by its own proper gravity".
Michell's astronomical work fell into obscurity and was only rediscovered during the second half of the 20th Century
In France, the polymath Pierre-Simon Laplace promoted the idea of dark stars independently of Michell during the late 1790s
In 1805, the astronomer Edward Pigott published a paper suggesting the likelihood of stars "that have never shewn a glimpse of brightness."
McNasty -1 points 9 months ago
They've known about the electric universe. It's Earth's true nature. They tried to bury the fact that we had knowledge of this by telling you that alchemy is nonsense. They replaced alchemy with chemistry/ electricity/philosophy. Alchemy being the body of reality, they ripped its organs out and separated them so we wouldn't recognize it. Macrocosm/microcosm. Everything is either a smaller or larger version of the same thing. The laws that govern the cosmos are the same exact laws that govern the subatomic world along with the world we experience as human beings. Ancient scholars were able to have such a vast knowledge of the cosmic patterns because of their understanding of the subatomic natures, which in turn, would give you insight into how humans work physically and spiritually.