"Accelerationism doesn't at least often include violence?"
I don't know what accelerationism you're referring to, but no.
You should be encouraging open borders, communism and anti-white hatred as much as you can though. Anything that riles up the left. Anything that emboldens them. Anything that makes them hard to control by their masters in dc. Amplify their messages until industrial society straight up breaks down into spasms and paroxysms of division and dysfunction. Until nobody and I mean nobody listens to the federal or state governments any more. The goal is to take the state's measured careful slow-walk of genocide and ramp it up to the point they cant control the message or backlash any more.
Thats literally the only chance europeans have of escaping our genocide. A mass shock to the system, where no one can ignore that we are NOT all the same race, and where the day to day lives are so terrible, so unstable and dangerous from the breakdown of society, that like eastern europeans, the white family is forced by sheer necessity to work together like they did seventy+ years ago.
Till weakness and idealism in every day life mean death.
To the stars, through difficulty.
"etty much all the white nationalist groups I can think of that embrace accelerationism envision collapse of society involving violence"
The base and atomwaffen are mossad nothing-ops who wont stretch out their own necks to meaningfully do anything so they've devolved into mere paycheck justification operations.
The truth is this: No one in any meaningful, useable capacity, wants to join those fags. Not enough manpower. Wrong message.
Accelerationism, like any general chaos, leads to all sorts of things. That doesn't mean it promotes violence.
The same way someone calling for a protest understands that it may lead toothers committing crimes. One is not promoting it, only recognizing it may be a consequence.
Higher gas prices or shut down stores may be consequences of accelerationism too, so what?
Do we focus on ever negative consequence of ever single strategy and say "this, this is what this strategy is actually about."
No.
Because broken eggs -> omelets.
For example if I go hang signs that say "whites/jews/asians/hispanics are to blame for corona!" woudl that be promoting violence?
No. Thats not the intent. Do we acknowledge someone might take it the wrong way and commit crimes because of it? Yes.
But thats free speech for you.
All freedom has costs and consequences.
What others do in response to what you do, has nothing to do with you. Otherwise free speech wouldn't mean much would it?
notbillgates 1 points 3.9 years ago
"Accelerationism doesn't at least often include violence?"
I don't know what accelerationism you're referring to, but no.
You should be encouraging open borders, communism and anti-white hatred as much as you can though. Anything that riles up the left. Anything that emboldens them. Anything that makes them hard to control by their masters in dc.
Amplify their messages until industrial society straight up breaks down into spasms and paroxysms of division and dysfunction. Until nobody and I mean nobody listens to the federal or state governments any more.
The goal is to take the state's measured careful slow-walk of genocide and ramp it up to the point they cant control the message or backlash any more.
Thats literally the only chance europeans have of escaping our genocide. A mass shock to the system, where no one can ignore that we are NOT all the same race, and where the day to day lives are so terrible, so unstable and dangerous from the breakdown of society, that like eastern europeans, the white family is forced by sheer necessity to work together like they did seventy+ years ago.
Till weakness and idealism in every day life mean death.
To the stars, through difficulty.
"etty much all the white nationalist groups I can think of that embrace accelerationism envision collapse of society involving violence"
The base and atomwaffen are mossad nothing-ops who wont stretch out their own necks to meaningfully do anything so they've devolved into mere paycheck justification operations.
The truth is this: No one in any meaningful, useable capacity, wants to join those fags. Not enough manpower. Wrong message.
Accelerationism, like any general chaos, leads to all sorts of things. That doesn't mean it promotes violence.
The same way someone calling for a protest understands that it may lead to others committing crimes. One is not promoting it, only recognizing it may be a consequence.
Higher gas prices or shut down stores may be consequences of accelerationism too, so what?
Do we focus on ever negative consequence of ever single strategy and say "this, this is what this strategy is actually about."
No.
Because broken eggs -> omelets.
For example if I go hang signs that say "whites/jews/asians/hispanics are to blame for corona!"
woudl that be promoting violence?
No. Thats not the intent. Do we acknowledge someone might take it the wrong way and commit crimes because of it? Yes.
But thats free speech for you.
All freedom has costs and consequences.
What others do in response to what you do, has nothing to do with you. Otherwise free speech wouldn't mean much would it?