Sign into an existing account

As Ive said the trials are a sham. Why should we believe big pharma data. They are not sharing all their data with us. I used to work in quality data analysis. There are a million ways to tell a lie with statistics. You dont know what the platelet levels are for the average 25 year old after taking the second shot. Did they measure this at 3 days? At 2 weeks? If they did why cant I see that information.

When you control the design of experiment, the data collection, the analysis you can bend the results pretty much to anything you want. Since even a smart scientist may have little expertise in a given field you are trusting researchers to provide relavant data. Which big fucking pharma and the CDC wont.

This is what happened with HCQ. They couldnt make any money or political hay off HCQ which will WORK well on early stage covid. So they designed experiments using late stage patients and biased (non-randomized) data from cherry picked data sets . They abused propensity scoring and p-hacking to obtain the desired results, i.e. Hydroxychloroquine doesn’t work. And so millions died needlessly.

You do know Anthony Fauci directly funded the projects that created this virus. No? Why can we trust the system to properly collect and analyze data at this point?

I dont really need studies to back up the assertion that young people are more susceptible to these adverse reactions. But you can look at adverse effects data by age group and vaccine brand if you want on the CDC website. Old people have fewer of both mild and serious adverse reactions reported.

Which is no surprise if you understand what causes immune thrombocytopenia and what causes autoimmune syndromes.
They are both more common in younger people because younger people have stronger immune reactions. Any immune reaction can potentially cause thrombocytopenia and autoimmune syndrome. Anyone with a family history of any autoimmune syndrome is much more prone to develop ANY OTHER autoimmune syndrome as the result of ANY immune reaction. Younger females are 5 to 10x more likely to devolop autoimmune syndromes than their male counterparts and incidence or autoimmunity drop off precipitously after 55. Females in the reproductive age range have dramatically increased chance of clotting due to estrogen levels especially when taking oral contraception.

They aren’t going to perform the study that will accurately quantify the risk of developing clinically significant thrombocytopenia. You will never see that percentage published because it is probably incredibly high in young people. Most will just get over it. They have still never properly quantified the long term risk of getting an autoimmune disease from MMR or HPV or any other vax. Why should this be different.

Many will develop an autoimmune syndrome which will remain sub-clinical for months or years and they will never even link it with the vax when they do get diagnosed. Because they are dumb.

If you understand how these illnesses work then you know that they should be naturally expected and it is encumbent to prove that they are indeed extremely rare. They haven’t done that and they wont do that. The data collection system that you are relying on does not quantify frequency of clinical thrombocytopenia and does not ensure that all adverse reactions are captured. You would need to query every vaccine recipient a week later to colllect that data. You would need to do random blood testing of vaccine recipients and publish that data. That has not happened.

Thanks Helena.