Sign into an existing account

[Networking jews are in their usual koshering oif the public. with their repeatative "uproar", about a simple truthful free speech expressing sign].


"A University of Chicago professor is reportedly under investigation for an “antisemitic sign,” following complaints from Jewish groups.

Furthermore, a group called Stop Antisemitism wants to see the professor “immediately terminated,” according to a new statement given to The College Fix.

The group first posted a photo in late March alleging a chemistry professor posted the sign.

“Israel must pay for the murders and destruction,” the sign reads. It further claims Israel has killed 18,000 children. “DEPORT ISRAELIS,” the sign also states."

[You can read the jew groups invalid attacks on frew speech hidden behind shouts of "ANTISEMITISM !!!" for yourself. A free speech representative had this to say]:

"However, a free speech group criticized the investigation of the professor based on what can be seen in the photo. Stop Antisemitism’s photo is blurry in some parts, so it is not entirely clear what the entire sign says.

“Absent a viewpoint-neutral generally-applicable rule prohibiting posting signs on office windows that the university uniformly enforces against similar signs with different messages, the university’s free speech policies should protect the professor from investigation or punishment based on the views expressed in the sign,” Jessie Appleby, an attorney with the Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression, said via email.

“The proper response to offensive speech is more speech,” Appleby said. “Students and faculty who object to the sign’s content should respond with their own arguments, whether by displaying their own signs, explaining to others why the content of the sign is offensive, or engaging the person who displayed the sign in a conversation.”

“It is not the proper role of the university to decide which arguments are too offensive to air on campus though,” Appleby, who works on FIRE’s campus rights advocacy team, told The Fix."

https://www.thecollegefix.com/university-of-chicago-reportedly-investigates-professor-for-deport-israelis-sign/

"Israel’s plan to involve the United States in the occupation of Gaza"

"For two months, Israel has prevented humanitarian aid from entering Gaza, worsening what many already describe as a catastrophic situation. International aid organizations, which have been pushing for an end to the blockade, rejected Israel’s latest proposal this week. Under the plan, Israel’s cabinet announced it would indefinitely occupy Gaza and centralize aid distribution in select zones. Reports indicate that U.S.-based private security firms will be involved in distributing aid—fueling speculation that Donald Trump’s recent remarks about wanting to send aid to starving Gazans are linked to Israeli interests.

Trump, who had previously floated the idea of taking over Gaza, now appears to support a model that would financially benefit American firms. By bringing U.S. companies into its occupation and aid-distribution plan, Prime Minister Netanyahu seems to be courting Trump’s backing.

A Ceasefire That Didn’t Hold

The three-phase ceasefire agreement between Israel and Hamas—secured under pressure from Trump and framed as a political gift to him—was short-lived. The first phase centered on a hostage exchange, while the second called for the Israeli army to withdraw from Gaza. But from the outset, it was clear the Netanyahu government had no intention of moving to the second phase. By continuously bombing Gaza and adding new conditions, Israel simultaneously bought time for its military and maintained pressure on Hamas. Its demand for Hamas’s unconditional surrender made its lack of commitment to a lasting ceasefire clear.

Despite Israel’s broader strategy, the temporary lull in violence allowed for some limited aid to enter Gaza. But by late February, after Israel insisted on the unconditional release of all hostages, the process stalled again—and for the past two months, no humanitarian aid has been allowed in. Aid groups have since intensified their pressure on Israel, warning of looming famine. The drone strike on a ship near Malta that aimed to break the Gaza blockade sent a clear message: Israel will not shy away from using force to fend off international pressure. Now, having torpedoed the ceasefire, Netanyahu’s government is trying to establish a model where all aid can only flow under Israeli control.

Turning Aid Into a Weapon

A joint statement from global humanitarian organizations criticized Israel’s plan to monopolize aid distribution, warning that it risks turning humanitarian aid into a weapon of war. Since Israel is an active party in the conflict, allowing it to control the flow of aid would make it impossible to deliver assistance in a neutral, impartial manner. If Israel is both the occupying power and the authority distributing aid, then the aid itself becomes part of the war effort—a tool to manipulate and pressure Gaza’s civilians.

This concern echoes the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) arrest warrants for Netanyahu and Defense Minister Yoav Gallant. Among the most serious charges is the use of starvation as a method of warfare—recognized under international law as a war crime.

In an article for Foreign Affairs, Boyd van Dijk notes that while the legal basis for prosecuting starvation as a war tactic exists, actual convictions are rare. The difficulty of proving intent, coupled with the long-standing normalization of siege tactics in warfare, makes such prosecutions hard to win. With Europe offering little political support for the ICC’s case, Israel appears relatively unconcerned about potential consequences. According to Dijk, the outcome of this case could be a defining moment for international law: a test of whether it still has teeth. States like South Africa and Türkiye have helped raise the case’s profile, but stronger political backing for the ICC is urgently needed.

U.S. Backing Remains Key

Despite mounting international pressure, Israel’s greatest source of protection remains Washington. Netanyahu, having already handed Trump a political “win” with the short-lived ceasefire, is now devising new ways to keep U.S. support on his side. The idea of involving American firms in aid distribution gives Trump a way to claim moral high ground—helping the people of Gaza while standing against Hamas.

Trump, who once spoke of clearing Palestinians out of Gaza and turning it into the "Riviera of the Middle East," has recently gone quiet on that front. For now, he seems satisfied with the potential profits American companies could reap. But turning the U.S. into a partner in an open-ended Israeli occupation would ultimately conflict with Trump’s broader goal of pulling back from Middle East entanglements.

Relying on private contractors instead of U.S. troops might reduce political risk, but it still means embedding American interests—and obligations—on the ground. And that may be Netanyahu’s goal: to lock in long-term U.S. backing by entangling American firms in the Gaza occupation."

https://www.yenisafak.com/en/columns/kadir-ustun/israels-plan-to-involve-the-united-states-in-the-occupation-of-gaza-3701966

“A standing military force, with an overgrown Executive will not long be safe companions to liberty.”—James Madison

We are being frog-marched into tyranny at the end of a loaded gun. Or rather, hundreds of thousands of loaded guns.

Let’s not mince words: President Trump’s April 28 executive order is the oldest trick in the authoritarian playbook: martial law masquerading as law and order.

Officially titled “Strengthening and Unleashing America’s Law Enforcement to Pursue Criminals and Protect Innocent Citizens,” this order is a “heil Hitler” wrapped in the goosestepping, despotic trappings of national security.

Don’t be fooled by Trump’s tough-on-crime rhetoric, cloaked in patriotic language and the promise of safety.

This is the language of every strongman who’s ever ruled by force.

The White House claims the order will “empower state and local law enforcement to relentlessly pursue criminals and protect American communities.” But under this administration, “criminal” increasingly includes anyone who dares to exercise their constitutional rights.

The order doesn’t merely expand policing—it institutionalizes repression.

It sets us squarely on the road to martial law.

If allowed to stand, Trump’s executive order completes our shift from a nation of laws—where even the least among us had the right to due process—to a nation of enforcers: vigilantes with badges who treat “we the people” as suspects and subordinates.

Without invoking the Insurrection Act or deploying active-duty military forces, Trump has accelerated the transformation of domestic police into his own paramilitary force.

With the stroke of his presidential pen, he has laid the groundwork for a stealth version of martial law by:

Expanding police powers and legal protections;
Authorizing the DOJ to defend officers accused of civil rights violations;
Increasing the transfer of military equipment to local police;
Shielding law enforcement from judicial oversight;
Prioritizing law enforcement protection over civil liberties;
Embedding DHS and federal agents more deeply into local policing.
Since taking office in January 2025, Trump has moved systematically to dismantle what little accountability remains:

Terminating the National Law Enforcement Accountability Database;
Halting DOJ investigations into abusive police departments;
Expanding immigration enforcement while eliminating oversight;
Dismissing internal watchdogs at DOJ and DHS;
Weakening civil rights tools and body camera requirements;
Suspending or eliminating consent decrees nationwide.

All of this has occurred without congressional debate, judicial review, or constitutional scrutiny.

Through it all, Trump has emboldened police forces to act with near impunity, reinforcing a trend long embraced by powerful police unions, bureaucratic cronyism, and laws providing for qualified immunity that shield misconduct from public consequence.

For years, we have watched as the government transformed local law enforcement into extensions of the military: outfitted with military hardware and trained in battlefield tactics.

However, this executive order goes one step further—creating not just a de facto standing army but Trump’s own army: loyal not to the Constitution or the people, but to the president.

This is the very danger the Founders feared: a militarized police force answerable to a powerful executive, operating outside the bounds of the law.

While the Posse Comitatus Act was intended to prevent the military from becoming a domestic police force, this administration has found a workaround: transforming civilian police into a paramilitary force armed and trained like the military, but without the legal constraints.

In doing so, the federal government has effectively sidestepped both constitutional checks and statutory prohibitions meant to guard against military rule on American soil.


This is martial law without a declaration.

The battlefield is here.

Law enforcement today is equipped like the military, trained in battlefield tactics, and given broad discretion over who to target and how to respond. But these are not soldiers bound by the laws of war. They are civilian enforcers, wielding unchecked power with minimal oversight.

And they are everywhere.

Armored vehicles on neighborhood streets. Flashbang raids on family homes. Riot police in small towns. SWAT-style teams deployed by federal agencies. Drones overhead. Mass surveillance below.

We are fast approaching a reality where constitutional rights exist in name only.

In practice, we are ruled by a quasi-military bureaucracy empowered to:

Detain without trial;
Punish political dissent;
Seize property under civil asset forfeiture;
Classify critics as extremists or terrorists;
Conduct mass surveillance on the populace;
Raid homes in the name of “public safety”;
Use deadly force at the slightest provocation.

In other words, we’ve got freedom in name only.

It’s the same scenario nationwide: in big cities and small towns alike, militarized “warrior” cops—hyped up on power—ride roughshod over individual rights by exercising almost absolute discretion over who is a threat, what constitutes resistance, and how harshly they can deal with the citizens they were appointed to “serve and protect.”

This nationwide epidemic of court-sanctioned police violence has already ensured that unarmed Americans—many of them mentally ill, elderly, disabled, or simply noncompliant—will continue to die at the hands of militarized police.

From individuals shot for holding garden hoses, to those killed after calling 911 for help, these tragedies underscore a chilling truth: in a police state, the only truly “safe” person is one who offers no resistance at all.

These killings are the inevitable result of a system that rewards vigilante aggression by warrior cops and punishes accountability.

These so-called warrior cops, trained to act as judge, jury and executioner, increasingly outnumber those who still honor their oath to uphold the Constitution and serve the public.

Now, under the cover of executive orders and nationalist rhetoric, that warrior mentality is being redirected toward a more dangerous mission: silencing political dissent.

Emboldened by Trump’s call to reopen Alcatraz and target so-called “homegrown” threats, these forces are no longer going to be tasked with enforcing the law—they will be deployed to enforce political obedience.

Backed by the full power of the state and unbound by meaningful accountability, these police state enforcers operate with the tactics of a military force but without its legal constraints. They are not soldiers governed by the rules of war. They are the foot soldiers of the police state.

And their numbers are growing.

This is not a theory. It is a reality unfolding before our eyes.

Battlefield tactics. Camouflage gear. Mass arrests. Tear gas. Strip searches. Drones. Water cannons. Rubber bullets. Concussion grenades. Intimidation. Laws abandoned at will.

We are living in a creeping state of undeclared martial law.

The militarization of police and federal agencies over recent decades has only accelerated the timeline toward authoritarianism.

The groundwork was laid long ago: the NDAA’s indefinite detention powers; court rulings that excuse shootings of unarmed citizens; the normalization of asset forfeiture, round-the-clock surveillance, and militarized drills in American cities.

This regime of lawless enforcement has been built over time—by legislators, courts, and a public too willing to look the other way.

Don’t be fooled: this is not law and order. This is constitutional demolition under the color of authority.

We are being trained to accept militarized policing, normalized surveillance, and injustice disguised as safety.

This is how freedom ends—not with a loud decree, but with the quiet, calculated erosion of every principle we once held sacred.

We’ve come full circle—from resisting British redcoats to submitting to American forces with the same disdain for liberty.

Our constitutional foundation is crumbling, and with it, any illusion that those in power still serve the public good.

Congress, for its part, has abdicated its role as a constitutional check on executive power—passing sweeping authorizations with little scrutiny and failing to rein in executive overreach. The courts, too, have in the past sanctioned many of these abuses in the name of national security, public order, or qualified immunity. Instead of acting as constitutional safeguards, these institutions have largely become rubber stamps.

Indeed, the president, Congress, the courts, and the police have come to embody the very abuse the Founders fought to resist. Only now are the courts beginning to show glimmers of allegiance to the Constitution.

This is not about partisanship. This is about power without restraint.

As tempting as it is to place full blame on Trump for this full-throttle shift into martial law, he is not the architect of this police state. He is its most shameless enabler—a useful frontman for the Deep State in its ongoing war on the American people.

As we warn in Battlefield America: The War on the American People and A Government of Wolves: The Emerging American Police State, we are sliding fast down a slippery slope to a Constitution-free America.

We ignore these signs at our peril.

https://www.lifesitenews.com/analysis/talmudic-israel-is-not-biblical-israel/?utm_source=popular

------X
TRUMP and BOLSHEVIKS
https://storage.ning.com/topology/rest/1.0/file/get/13533696296?profile=original
https://12160.info/photo/criticize

https://goyimtv.com/l/2149890962/Friday-Night-Fuhrer-HT-is-LIVE-OMETV--Show-Starts---9pm-Eastern---6pm-West-Coast--Share-Stream-on-GAB-X-Telegram---Kike-Book--link-to-super-chat--https---entropystream-live-app-HT

o/ WFP

https://goyimtv.com/l/1206323585/BONUS-SHOW--Swastika-Sunday--HT-is-Live-on-OMETV---Clips---930pm-Eastern---630pm-West-Coast--Share-Stream-on-Gab-4chan-X-Telegram-etc--SUPER-CHAT-LINK--https---entropystream-live-app-HT

o/ WFP

It's underrated.