The main economic problem of wealth procurement is leverage of one economy over another. This can be that a country that is self sustaining can become bankrupt or destitute because they are locked out of a mineral or other technological resource to enter the next development stage of there economy.
A monetary system that can remove leverage of one economic advantage over another as leverage for cheaper access for the raw resources of the poor country such as labor and mineral rights would be best.
I would use some form of defi, decentralized finance, to remove the leverage of one economic system over another. Economic power is layered over one nation in monetary systems, terrible trade agreements like we get in America like Nafta.
I would choose for a country like America to use a gov't dollar like Lincoln's Green back. And the citizen's to use some form of crypto with the green back with gold and silver.
I would use the existing leverage if any now exists in our Central Bank (Federal Reserve) in getting as much cash advances as possible and as many resources we can get until that leverage is gone for good.
Those Foster Kids That Got in the Shootout Were White
https://dailystormer.su/those-foster-kids-that-got-in-the-shootout-were-white/
Its is more brutal what these kids experienced that we can imagine, it was the "little" girl (the scared boy protecting his sister), defending themselves against the pigs outside.
It ought to be asked in relative terms of what type of monetary system is preferred.
1. who mints the money (central gov't, central banks, mined, mined with computers)
2. how the money finances itself
2.a Central Gov't (taxes, arrest, economic activity of everyone)
2.b Central Banks (increase, decrease supply, to all users against the total economic output of a nations people)
3.c Natural resources mined (gold, silver)
3.d Computers (only needs a ledger of who has what)
This is why conservationists are idiots, that following a conservationist model of the economy you run out of resources and innovation before you develop new technologies which make greater efficiencies for the resources you currently have.
You have to explain the terms within a consistent model. Free-will vs determinism as in objective versus subjective, depends upon the model used to describe both physical and mental entities. We explain physical entities like orbits of particles in an atom with 'models' as we do with the orbits of planetary bodies using another model. We do have a 'subjective' model to accurately explain the 'mental' entities that are part of the 'objective' model that we recognize that also exist in other people's minds.
As our minds as well (which exist only as a mental entity, that is described as having both objective and subjective parts, this 'subjective' model has to be explained with a consistent model of the 'mind-body' problem. Not impossible, it just requires being consistent with definitions.
The model which is also part of our 'subjective' experience is also producing the model as well as part of the objective model, needs to be described so that the model both represents the experience in one mind that may also exist in another mind.
Then after you've made a consistent model that points to all parts of the mind-body problem then you have essentially an entity called agreement, that agreement is essentially what we would say is money, as it successfully validates and legitimizes all the requirements of 'existing', being 'real, and having passed all the thresholds of 'agreements' between minds.
And all the sub-aspects of agreement are currencies.
I believe he wanted to say milenias without her feeling put down for not knowing she is a 'millenial' (melanin'ial) (milenia, eras, epochs, centuries.. etc)
He's a psychological controlled agent like a Manchurian candidate. The psychological defenses are used in a counter-positive way as what harms me and what harms you (individually), and what protects me and what protects you (in a group), identifying the individual in a group for safety of the group over the individual is R/K selection theory such that the mechanisms or R animals fight/flight are transposed to K preservation techniques of attacking in numbers and letting the most powerful lead the charge.
Jews built the first Mosque and live peacefully with the Moslems. The Muslims are another arm of Jewish control of taking power from a country, similar to the way blacks are weaponized in America.
donutbakery 0 points 2.8 years ago
Georgia
Nevada
Arizona
Michigan
Wisconsin
Are slave states to the Central Gov't,Int'l Bankers, Manufacturing/Industrial Globalists
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=60edfa65b064a
donutbakery 0 points 2.9 years ago
https://www.kali.org/
or any of these Linux Distros that reside in memory only
https://itsfoss.com/linux-hacking-penetration-testing/
You can either boot these from a USB drive or run them from VirtualBox
/v/technology viewpost?postid=60cf902807781
donutbakery 0 points 2.9 years ago*
Thank you for the great links it is much appreciated. As time permits, I'm going to make a Hugo sites for all this content to make it more sharable.
https://gohugo.io/
https://docport.netlify.app/docport-theme/
/v/books viewpost?postid=60cec0dc625ea
donutbakery 1 point 2.9 years ago
Thank you
/v/books viewpost?postid=60cec0dc625ea
donutbakery 0 points 2.9 years ago
The main economic problem of wealth procurement is leverage of one economy over another. This can be that a country that is self sustaining can become bankrupt or destitute because they are locked out of a mineral or other technological resource to enter the next development stage of there economy.
A monetary system that can remove leverage of one economic advantage over another as leverage for cheaper access for the raw resources of the poor country such as labor and mineral rights would be best.
I would use some form of defi, decentralized finance, to remove the leverage of one economic system over another. Economic power is layered over one nation in monetary systems, terrible trade agreements like we get in America like Nafta.
I would choose for a country like America to use a gov't dollar like Lincoln's Green back. And the citizen's to use some form of crypto with the green back with gold and silver.
I would use the existing leverage if any now exists in our Central Bank (Federal Reserve) in getting as much cash advances as possible and as many resources we can get until that leverage is gone for good.
/v/AskVoat viewpost?postid=60c458c01813c
donutbakery 0 points 2.9 years ago
Those Foster Kids That Got in the Shootout Were White
https://dailystormer.su/those-foster-kids-that-got-in-the-shootout-were-white/
Its is more brutal what these kids experienced that we can imagine, it was the "little" girl (the scared boy protecting his sister), defending themselves against the pigs outside.
There was no safe space in there psychology
/v/HDLunited viewpost?postid=60c4d8c6a220f
donutbakery 0 points 2.9 years ago
It ought to be asked in relative terms of what type of monetary system is preferred.
1. who mints the money (central gov't, central banks, mined, mined with computers)
2. how the money finances itself
2.a Central Gov't (taxes, arrest, economic activity of everyone)
2.b Central Banks (increase, decrease supply, to all users against the total economic output of a nations people)
3.c Natural resources mined (gold, silver)
3.d Computers (only needs a ledger of who has what)
3.
4.
/v/AskVoat viewpost?postid=60c458c01813c
donutbakery 0 points 2.9 years ago
Simon–Ehrlich wager
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Simon%E2%80%93Ehrlich_wager
This is why conservationists are idiots, that following a conservationist model of the economy you run out of resources and innovation before you develop new technologies which make greater efficiencies for the resources you currently have.
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=60c282398f483
donutbakery 1 point 2.9 years ago*
He was spot on, we were sold out, we knew it then and we feel it now.
/v/books viewpost?postid=60bf942d4fe92
donutbakery 0 points 2.9 years ago
You have to explain the terms within a consistent model. Free-will vs determinism as in objective versus subjective, depends upon the model used to describe both physical and mental entities. We explain physical entities like orbits of particles in an atom with 'models' as we do with the orbits of planetary bodies using another model. We do have a 'subjective' model to accurately explain the 'mental' entities that are part of the 'objective' model that we recognize that also exist in other people's minds.
As our minds as well (which exist only as a mental entity, that is described as having both objective and subjective parts, this 'subjective' model has to be explained with a consistent model of the 'mind-body' problem. Not impossible, it just requires being consistent with definitions.
The model which is also part of our 'subjective' experience is also producing the model as well as part of the objective model, needs to be described so that the model both represents the experience in one mind that may also exist in another mind.
Then after you've made a consistent model that points to all parts of the mind-body problem then you have essentially an entity called agreement, that agreement is essentially what we would say is money, as it successfully validates and legitimizes all the requirements of 'existing', being 'real, and having passed all the thresholds of 'agreements' between minds.
And all the sub-aspects of agreement are currencies.
/v/Philosophy viewpost?postid=60be5ce1295c9
donutbakery 0 points 2.9 years ago*
I believe he wanted to say milenias without her feeling put down for not knowing she is a 'millenial' (melanin'ial) (milenia, eras, epochs, centuries.. etc)
She has been put down for centuries
/v/Hiddenlol viewpost?postid=60b639dc86f23
donutbakery 0 points 2.9 years ago
She's a steam boat captain
Doc Watson Performing Handsome Molly
https://youtu.be/zQ-wq5iq7OA
/v/videos viewpost?postid=60b3be12a1a61
donutbakery 1 point 3.0 years ago*
He's a psychological controlled agent like a Manchurian candidate. The psychological defenses are used in a counter-positive way as what harms me and what harms you (individually), and what protects me and what protects you (in a group), identifying the individual in a group for safety of the group over the individual is R/K selection theory such that the mechanisms or R animals fight/flight are transposed to K preservation techniques of attacking in numbers and letting the most powerful lead the charge.
Jews built the first Mosque and live peacefully with the Moslems. The Muslims are another arm of Jewish control of taking power from a country, similar to the way blacks are weaponized in America.
/v/HDLunited viewpost?postid=60b0f6aaabe44
donutbakery 2 points 3.0 years ago*
The left can't meme is a misnomer, there memes are so powerful they can't be seen to be measured
The Great Boomer Deception
https://youtu.be/OvSDIbikprY
/v/Hiddenlol viewpost?postid=60a97338b607f
donutbakery 0 points 3.1 years ago
Also, notice he used the 'blue' the Jew as a 'Christian' thing. Juezus wouldn't do that
/v/HDLunited viewpost?postid=6061d2c9acd58