In my opinion, it would take a revolution to see real change in the system against you know who.
https://files.catbox.moe/13dfqx.jpeg
https://files.catbox.moe/sjfp5j.png
Yes, I was responding giving the benefit of the doubt assuming that they are lies. Though of course, the truth will prevail regardless, but lies that are lies against someone's character should be dispelled. Mind you, I don't think system is innocent nor likely an ideal admin. He's definitely flawed and most concerning is his allowance of things verging on child pornography.
I would keep an eye on system. He seems to be on damage control.
Particularly this section: https://files.catbox.moe/9cs6k4.PNG
which goes into child pornography laws being amended to include "computer-generated" images that are otherwise indistinguishable from real child pornography.
>How do you determine and verify the age of a cartoon character?
I doubt this gets taken into account. I would imagine in any case if it is obviously a minor being depicted sexually then it is considered child pornography under the 2003 PROTECT Act.
>Drawings are not child exploitation
They can be considered child pornography though (2003 PROTECT Act): https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/PLAW-108publ21/html/PLAW-108publ21.htm
It seems like you would benefit by taking on a more stoic approach to those who criticize you:
https://files.catbox.moe/84fxy9.png
https://files.catbox.moe/tcu7py.jpg
Well done,
In your wake, you've certainly lead the masses of Ruqqus out of the artificial Jewish darkness into the light. Even after striking you down to protect their precious shekels, you were a martyr to the remaining users at Ruqqus, still seeking the light lost that you provided. You have definitely accelerated that site's self-destruction and redpilled many normies in the process.
You have my continued respect, antiliberalsociety.
https://files.catbox.moe/wpl8pj.png
o/
No, it's not Jewish. The choice of Gutenberg as the site name is likely an allusion to the first printing press being invented by the historical figure, Johannes Gutenberg. The actual founder of Project Gutenberg is Michael S. Hart who has [no mention of being Jewish on his Wikipedia page](https://files.catbox.moe/gsq8mg.jpg) and looks fairly European (basing that on his big ears).
(And also if he was a Jew, do you think he would give away e-books for *free*?)
Update:
The original image in the OP features Seneca the Younger in the background. This new image features Epictetus in the background: https://files.catbox.moe/84fxy9.png
I understand, but there's nothing I, as an individual, can do to repel ZOG in Germany from blocking Gutenberg.
I can draw attention to it and provide alternatives, but this is mostly out of my control.
Partially yes. It would be best overall for anti-vaxxers to extend the Olive Branch whenever possible to civil vaxxers to get some common ground and depolarize some of more indoctrinated normie vax-pushers. Buying into the false dichotomy is the media and establishment's strength, "divide and conquer".
Though, I should say again, I'm posting this on my friend's behalf and don't necessarily agree with everything in the OP image.
Xigbar68 1 point 2.6 years ago
Qui?
https://files.catbox.moe/bt2yws.mp4
/v/Jews viewpost?postid=614794ea8952a
Xigbar68 0 points 2.6 years ago
For some of the more controversial ones probably.
/v/Memes viewpost?postid=61480a301766f
Xigbar68 1 point 2.6 years ago
In my opinion, it would take a revolution to see real change in the system against you know who.
https://files.catbox.moe/13dfqx.jpeg
https://files.catbox.moe/sjfp5j.png
/v/Jews viewpost?postid=614794ea8952a
Xigbar68 0 points 2.6 years ago
https://files.catbox.moe/lb2wm3.jpg
/v/Whitepill viewpost?postid=614751c0ab6e6
Xigbar68 1 point 2.6 years ago
>Except truth is not libel.
Yes, I was responding giving the benefit of the doubt assuming that they are lies. Though of course, the truth will prevail regardless, but lies that are lies against someone's character should be dispelled. Mind you, I don't think system is innocent nor likely an ideal admin. He's definitely flawed and most concerning is his allowance of things verging on child pornography.
I would keep an eye on system. He seems to be on damage control.
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=614650d39837c
Xigbar68 19 points 2.6 years ago
This was infuriating to watch.
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=61466fee34d5f
Xigbar68 7 points 2.6 years ago
>What section?
Particularly this section: https://files.catbox.moe/9cs6k4.PNG
which goes into child pornography laws being amended to include "computer-generated" images that are otherwise indistinguishable from real child pornography.
>How do you determine and verify the age of a cartoon character?
I doubt this gets taken into account. I would imagine in any case if it is obviously a minor being depicted sexually then it is considered child pornography under the 2003 PROTECT Act.
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=614650d39837c
Xigbar68 7 points 2.6 years ago
Just say it's libel if you think if it is worthy of a public response and move on. That or ignore it.
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=614650d39837c
Xigbar68 8 points 2.6 years ago
>Drawings are not child exploitation
They can be considered child pornography though (2003 PROTECT Act): https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/PLAW-108publ21/html/PLAW-108publ21.htm
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=614650d39837c
Xigbar68 15 points 2.6 years ago
It seems like you would benefit by taking on a more stoic approach to those who criticize you:
https://files.catbox.moe/84fxy9.png
https://files.catbox.moe/tcu7py.jpg
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=614650d39837c
Xigbar68 10 points 2.6 years ago
G
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=614650d39837c
Xigbar68 0 points 2.6 years ago
This
https://files.catbox.moe/x7s4bs.jpg
https://files.catbox.moe/xmn7bq.jpg
https://files.catbox.moe/eq05hw.jpg
/v/MeanwhileOnRuqqus viewpost?postid=613fe392abfaa
Xigbar68 0 points 2.6 years ago
https://files.catbox.moe/1q0i5e.jpg
https://files.catbox.moe/byqelv.png
/v/MeanwhileOnRuqqus viewpost?postid=613fe392abfaa
Xigbar68 1 point 2.7 years ago
Well done,
In your wake, you've certainly lead the masses of Ruqqus out of the artificial Jewish darkness into the light. Even after striking you down to protect their precious shekels, you were a martyr to the remaining users at Ruqqus, still seeking the light lost that you provided. You have definitely accelerated that site's self-destruction and redpilled many normies in the process.
You have my continued respect, antiliberalsociety.
https://files.catbox.moe/wpl8pj.png
o/
/v/MeanwhileOnRuqqus viewpost?postid=6140979cba695
Xigbar68 1 point 2.7 years ago
Holy fucking shit, Freud was the origin of the "have sex" meme.
https://files.catbox.moe/bkr85o.jpg
/v/4Chan viewpost?postid=61423c20718c7
Xigbar68 0 points 2.7 years ago
No, it's not Jewish. The choice of Gutenberg as the site name is likely an allusion to the first printing press being invented by the historical figure, Johannes Gutenberg. The actual founder of Project Gutenberg is Michael S. Hart who has [no mention of being Jewish on his Wikipedia page](https://files.catbox.moe/gsq8mg.jpg) and looks fairly European (basing that on his big ears).
(And also if he was a Jew, do you think he would give away e-books for *free*?)
References:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Johannes_Gutenberg
https://www.gutenberg.org/about/
https://www.gutenberg.org/about/background/mission_statement.html
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_S._Hart
/v/Stoicism viewpost?postid=613e19a3b73ea
Xigbar68 0 points 2.7 years ago
Update:
The original image in the OP features Seneca the Younger in the background. This new image features Epictetus in the background: https://files.catbox.moe/84fxy9.png
/v/Stoicism viewpost?postid=613e19a3b73ea
Xigbar68 0 points 2.7 years ago
Yeah except AOU actually moderates his subs.
/v/Memes viewpost?postid=613dbe5c8bd2b
Xigbar68 0 points 2.7 years ago
This probably would've been better suited in /v/Quotes.
https://www.voat.xyz/v/Quotes
/v/Memes viewpost?postid=613dbe5c8bd2b
Xigbar68 1 point 2.7 years ago
I understand, but there's nothing I, as an individual, can do to repel ZOG in Germany from blocking Gutenberg.
I can draw attention to it and provide alternatives, but this is mostly out of my control.
/v/Stoicism viewpost?postid=613e19a3b73ea
Xigbar68 1 point 2.7 years ago
That's interesting. Though of course, there's always alternatives to get around this:
https://archive.ph/XAWeG
https://files.catbox.moe/6z34la.txt
/v/Stoicism viewpost?postid=613e19a3b73ea
Xigbar68 3 points 2.7 years ago
In essence
/v/Stoicism viewpost?postid=613e19a3b73ea
Xigbar68 1 point 2.7 years ago
It's a shill. Archived profile for further reference.
https://archive.ph/6lrrO
https://archive.ph/5iMq7
https://archive.ph/QoNc3
Good indicator of a shill is posting controversial things while usually being less than 2 weeks old account wise.
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=6138cd35af50a
Xigbar68 1 point 2.7 years ago
Makes you think.
https://files.catbox.moe/odg1sx.jpg
https://files.catbox.moe/mcfrpm.png
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=6138e6558a991
Xigbar68 0 points 2.7 years ago
Partially yes. It would be best overall for anti-vaxxers to extend the Olive Branch whenever possible to civil vaxxers to get some common ground and depolarize some of more indoctrinated normie vax-pushers. Buying into the false dichotomy is the media and establishment's strength, "divide and conquer".
Though, I should say again, I'm posting this on my friend's behalf and don't necessarily agree with everything in the OP image.
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=6137dca9b6b36