×
Login Register an account
Top Submissions Explore Upgoat Search Random Subverse Random Post Colorize! Site Rules


Xeros
Member for: 2.9 years

scp: 0 (+0/-0)
ccp: 15 (+15/-0)
votes given: 2 (+2/-0)
score: 15





Trophies

Xeros 0 points 2.4 years ago

Has some interesting tidbits, like new productions have a cap of 30% white people. Jews are counted as white for these purposes. Also contains this wonderful line near the end:

"If “whiteness is a state of mind” (the ideology pushed by the Ibram X. Kendis and funded by the Shlomo Oyveygenbergs), then Ashkenazi Tay-Sachs DNA don’t count for shit."

Indeed.


/v/TellVoat viewpost?postid=62038ebba5e31

Xeros 3 points 2.4 years ago

>The narrative is collapsing with suspicious speed...

It's a controlled demolition.


/v/news viewpost?postid=61ed37c4c263d

Xeros 8 points 2.8 years ago

Thanks for the cites MasterAce. This document isn't the easiest to parse for people outside of Biotech, at least for me. On page 2 it contains this paragraph:

"On August 23, 2021, FDA approved the biologics license application (BLA) submitted by BioNTech Manufacturing GmbH for COMIRNATY (COVID-19 Vaccine, mRNA) for active immunization to prevent COVID-19 caused by SARS-CoV-2 in individuals 16 years of age and older."

So having a BLA approved would let them introduce a biologic product into interstate commerce according to that bastion of truth wikipedia (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biologics_license_application). I think is a very verbose way of saying it's approved.

Footnote 9 also states: "Although COMIRNATY (COVID-19 Vaccine, mRNA) is approved to prevent COVID-19 in individuals 16 years of age and older ..."

MasterAce has pointed out on page 12, while talking about allowed advertisements "This product has not been approved or licensed by FDA, but has been authorized for emergency use by FDA, under an EUA to prevent Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) for use in individuals 12 years of age and older; and"

So is this thing approved or not? I think the general public will say of course. The skeptical part of me thinks that contradiction on page 12 is there to limit people from liability or somesuch.


/v/whatever viewpost?postid=6123c5f9d4372

Xeros 4 points 2.9 years ago

It's called 'The Believer (2001)'. I haven't seen in since it came out, but there were scenes that were unintentionally hilarious even before I was redpilled. Be advised it is blatant propaganda though.


/v/Jews viewpost?postid=6112b8bf62905