Sign into an existing account

"Israeli army officers refuse to serve in ‘unnecessary, eternal war’ in Gaza"
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2025/jun/11/israeli-government-orders-must-not-be-obeyed-idf-intelligence-officers


"In letter to Netanyahu, 41 signatories say government’s orders are ‘clearly illegal’ and hostages have been given ‘death sentence’

Israel’s government is issuing “clearly illegal” orders that must not be obeyed, a group of Israeli military intelligence officers have said, announcing they will no longer participate in combat operations in Gaza.

In a letter addressed to Israel’s prime minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, the defence minister, Israel Katz, and the head of the military, the group of 41 officers and reservists said the government was waging an “unnecessary, eternal war” in Gaza.

The letter, which was shared online late on Tuesday, said the group would refuse to take part in a “war designed to preserve the rule of Netanyahu” and appease “anti-democratic and messianic elements in [his] government”.

The letter’s signatories are not named but are identified as members of the Israel Defense Forces (IDF)’s intelligence directorate, which has played a key role in the 20-month offensive in the Gaza Strip, particularly through the selection of bombing targets.

Addressing the impact of the offensive on civilians in the territory, the group wrote: “When a government acts for ulterior motives, harms civilians and leads to the killing of innocent people, the orders it issues are clearly illegal, and we must not obey them.”

The intelligence officers said Netanyahu’s government had given a “death sentence” to the Israeli hostages held by Hamas militants in Gaza when it “chose to collapse” the ceasefire deal in March.

The group, which is understood to include members of the elite military surveillance division Unit 8200, claimed that “many hostages have already been killed by IDF bombings” and accused the government of continuing to “abandon their lives”.

Organised by the anti-war group Soldiers for the Hostages, the letter comes amid growing dissent within certain parts of the military over the continuation of the war in Gaza and an apparent increase in the numbers of soldiers who are refusing to fight.

Speaking to the Guardian, one of the intelligence officers who signed the letter said: “The hope is that as many people as possible will challenge the legitimacy of this operation and of this government.”

They added: “All the death is unnecessary. The hostages suffer and die. Soldiers are sent for nothing. And all the killing in Gaza, everything is completely unnecessary.”
Adam in a hospital bed with a bandage around his head and cuts all over his face
Gaza doctor and son evacuated after husband and nine children killed in Israeli strike
Read more

According to the latest figures from Gaza’s health authorities, the Israeli offensive has killed at least 55,000 people and wounded approximately 125,000. The death toll, which estimates suggest could be considerably higher, does not separate civilians from the number of militants killed.

Fifty-six hostages are still held in Gaza by Hamas militants and other armed groups after they were captured on 7 October 2023 in attacks on southern Israel that killed 1,200 people. At least 20 of the hostages are believed to still be alive, according to Israeli authorities.

The intelligence officers’ letter adds to open criticism in recent months from some quarters of the military. In April, 250 reservists and alumni from Unit 8200 urged the government to end the war, though they stopped short of calling for a general refusal to serve.

The latest statement calls on every Israeli “to do everything in their power” to oppose the war and says “some of us will refuse [to serve] publicly” while many others will refuse “in other, non-public ways”.

One intelligence officer who has recently refused to serve said they could no longer participate in a war in which the military “didn’t think twice” about harming civilians when bombing targets in Gaza.

In an interview, they said: “I felt that it was immoral and insanely excessive. I felt that they stopped thinking and feeling, and they were willing to do everything to achieve a goal that wasn’t really a real goal … and if there is a goal, it’s to try to get rid of Gaza’s population by any means.”

The IDF has been approached for comment."

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2025/jun/11/israeli-government-orders-must-not-be-obeyed-idf-intelligence-officers

[SHORT BLURB]:
"Progressives refused to reverse course. Instead, they revised their mantra to “Criminals are the victims of the unjust society.”. In the 1960s there was not even conservative talk radio to push back. Leftists were in full control and saw that the public was terrified, so they voted for themselves and massive government. With their checklist demands, they voted for anything and everything except protecting the public from criminals."

https://canadafreepress.com/article/the-d.o.g.e-crime-scene

Same thing with the Ukraine War as Zelensky plays “Bad Cop” to Trump’s
juvenile “Good Cop” role

https://stateofthenation.info/?p=22426

"There should be no question whatsoever that President Donald J. Trump has always been a hardcore Zionist Neocon warmonger at heart; and not the peacemaker he tries very hard to project on the world stage.

Trump’s MO is basically this: It’s either MY WAY OR THE HIGHWAY. Which is exactly how his Khazarian handlers trained and mind-controlled him to be for his second [civilization-destroying] term.

And, if Trump does not get his way, he will use the extremely well-armed IDF (armed to the teeth by the American Military Industrial Complex) to attack Iran any time they want to with virtual impunity, as they just did: FULL REPORT: ISRAEL LAUNCHES MASSIVE UNPROVOKED ATTACK AGAINST IRAN (Photos)

Didn’t Team Trump very stealthily just do the very same thing to Russia when NATO (correctly known as the North Atlantic Terrorist Organization) treacherously destroyed so many nuclear-capable strategic bombers parked out in the open as required by their New START Treaty with the United States?!

Clearly that very bad Trump move was designed to be the Russia Federation’s “Pearl Harbor” in order to elicit a full-scale Russian military response against every NATO member who the Kremlin knew had secretly colluded in that extremely complex terror operation.

Now we see Neocon Zionist Trump doing the very same thing using the IDF and MOSSAD as his cat’s paw to outright invade the Islamic Republic of Iran.

Israel Strikes Iran Again! Says Operation Could Last Two Weeks
[How utterly stupid is the leadership in Tehran! They had every
right to conduct a pre-emptive attack on Israel]

The upshot of this short discussion is that President Trump has proven himself to be a thoroughly untrustworthy Khazarian CON MAN of the very highest order. He has consistently betrayed every single nation that he “does a deal with”. In so doing, Trump has completely destroyed his credibility as well as what very little integrity the U.S. Federal Government still possesses in the eyes of the world community of nations. Most world leaders would say zero integrity, even our allies.

Little does the MAGA Movement yet know that Trump has also profoundly betrayed them as well as clearly explained here: AMERICAN BOLSHEVIK REVOLUTION Goes Nationwide This Saturday, June 14th.
Conclusion

There are actually several major reasons why Trump is surreptitiously prosecuting so many unprovoked wars of naked aggression across the planet for his Khazarian masters. However, there is ONE objective that reigns supreme. As follows:

Everyone wants to know why Trump is playing such
an astonishingly dangerous game—THIS IS WHY!"

https://stateofthenation.info/?p=22426

COMMENTOR: Rothschild on June 11, 2025

8 billion wogs on the planet now. Less than 500 million whites left. Time to start Waste Whitey III & put the kibosh on the white man.

His comment was in respose to this article indicating that the jewed"US" is preparing to bomb Iran.
-------
"US prepares to evacuate non-essential staff from Middle East as regional tensions flare"
[Short blurb from that article]:

"The US State Department is preparing to evacuate non-essential staff from the American embassy in Baghdad as regional tensions flare over faltering efforts between Washington and Tehran to reach a nuclear deal.

Additionally, US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth authorised the departure of military dependents from locations across the region.

The moves come as talks between the US and Iran over its rapidly advancing nuclear programme appear to have hit an impasse.

President Donald Trump said he was less sure Iran would agree to stop uranium enrichment in a nuclear deal, and Iran’s Minister of Defence Aziz Nasirzadeh said Tehran will strike US bases in the region if nuclear talks fail and conflict arises with Washington.

Mr Trump told the New York Post he was “much less confident of a deal being made”.

“They seem to be delaying, and I think that’s a shame,” the US President said, two days after voicing optimism about talks and claiming a sixth round of talks would take place this week."

[Continues]:
https://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/?p=310254

A Sick Aussie article - but, has some points which need examination. jews - "Success: depends on self-control." [NOT, of course, on jew networking]

Success: depends on self-control.

"It has become politically incorrect these days to look at specific cultural and ethnic groups and draw conclusions from how they think and behave. Even when those conclusions happen to be positive, there’s still a forbidden stench about them lest you make other groups feel inferior.

And yet there are some statistics and characteristics so glaringly obvious and astounding they’re impossible to ignore. Consider, for example, the following, all of which are based on credible data in the United States:


[b]The median household net worth is $99,500 but among Jews it’s $443,000.
Even though they make up 1.7 per cent of the American population, Jews account for twenty of the fifty richest people and a third of the top 400.
Despite constituting just 0.2 per cent of the global population, Jews have won half the non-fiction Pulitzer prizes and a fifth of the Nobel ones.[/b]
The amount of land owned by the Mormon church is larger than the state of Delaware.
The Church of England has assets of $6.9 billion whereas the Mormon church, with a fraction of the members, has assets of $30 billion.

Those findings are detailed in a fascinating and immensely readable new book, The Triple Package, written by Amy Chua and Jed Rubenfeld, both of whom are professors at Yale. Using enormous amounts of empirical research, they conclude Jews and Mormons (and a few others) share three attributes: (i) they feel superior; (ii) they feel insecure; and (iii) they control their impulses.

It’s true that feeling both superior and insecure is a conflicting paradox. Jews, for instance, fundamentally believe they’re the ‘chosen ones’ while simultaneously feeling threatened even decades after the end of World War II.

[b]If you’re fortunate enough to be part of a group that tends to make its members feel that way, statistically you have a greater chance of success. But if you’re part of the less fortunate majority, here’s what you can learn – and emulate – from what those groups do that makes them so disproportionately successful.[/b]

Feel superior: As Chua and Rubenfeld note, feeling superior is especially challenging for those on the Left whose ideology encourages them to believe everybody is equal and that people shouldn’t judge themselves as better than anyone else. For progressives, “judgements are anathema. Group superiority is the stuff of racism, colonialism, imperialism, Nazism.”

And yet it is that sense of superiority that makes some groups strive to become more successful, if for no other reason than to prove their theory. The authors refer to it as the “I’ll show them” mentality. From an individual perspective, the same principle applies. Assess your talents and strengths, and convince yourself you have value to offer that others cannot.

Feel insecure: Another challenge outlined by Chua and Rubenfeld is that the self-esteem movement, particularly in regards to the indoctrination of it in kids, has instilled excessive amounts of preciousness to the extent many are unable to perceive or handle threats. Jews and Mormons, conversely, promote insecurity among their members and this fuels a cathexis of ambition.

For individuals, the key is to avoid complacency by vigilantly looking for threats in your pursuit of success. The more aware you are of the risk you won’t succeed, the more motivated you’ll become to try harder.

Control your impulses: This is about resisting temptation and staying focused, with the Mormons being a standout of such impulse control. The group’s teenagers, for example, are less likely to have sexual intercourse, drink alcohol, smoke pot, or watch X-rated films than teenagers of any other faith.

When it comes to personal success, some of the most inhibiting impulses include procrastination, irresponsible spending and unplanned decisions.

So, if all of the above increases your chances of becoming successful, is it also enough to make you happy? Sadly, no. Even Chua and Rubenfeld concede that “success to some extent necessarily implies a trade-off with happiness”. The question then becomes: which one do you crave the most?

Do you agree with these three success strategies? Why, or why not?"

https://www.smh.com.au/business/small-business/lessons-from-jews-and-mormons-20140307-34b11.html

20 sec

https://truthpodium.org/watch/birds-attack-jews_xgdNG9GJ4JNGEsQ.html

"OUT-OF-CONTROL MONSTER BRED AND FED BY THE EU"

"Zelensky is robbing families of their dead fathers, brothers and sons, says Ukrainian MP.

Artyom Dmitruk accused Kiev of hiding the true death toll and looting payouts meant for bereaved families.

The families of Ukrainian soldiers killed in action are entitled to government payouts of up to $360,000. This means that accepting the return of 6,000 bodies could potentially cost Kiev, whose budget is almost entirely reliant on Western aid, over $2 billion.

The Kiev regime avoids identifying the dead — no ID means no compensation to relatives. “They don’t pay for those listed as missing. No body, no money. They don’t pay parents or provide insurance for the dead,” Defence Analyst Viktor Litovkin explains.

This raises the question, was this betrayal an inspiration by Brussels or the unelected Volodymyr Zelensky, who TIME magazine claimed was JEW OF THE YEAR 2022?

‘I know Zelensky issued a personal order not to accept the bodies of the Ukrainian military men who were killed in action,’ Dmitruk said.’

And this situation can become liberating, so to speak. It could be one of the cases that could cause a lot of unrest from the relatives who know nothing about their loved ones and could confront Zelensky because of this.’

Zelensky falsely claimed this week that only 15% of the bodies Moscow offered to return had been identified, without clarifying whether Ukraine would accept any of them at all.

Moscow has said it is prepared to return over 6,000 bodies of Ukrainian soldiers, stored in special refrigerated trucks and trains, according to Russia’s lead negotiator, Vladimir Medinsky.

Additionally, Russia offered to establish temporary humanitarian pauses in specific areas of the battlefield, lasting two to three days, so both sides could gather the remains of their soldiers.

Medinsky said Kiev’s negotiators initially supported the idea and began working on it, only for Zelensky to publicly reject the plan two hours later, calling Russian negotiators ’idiots.’

Dmitruk accused the Ukrainian leadership of deliberately delaying the official recognition of missing soldiers to avoid paying out death benefits.

He referenced a proposed amendment that mandates a missing person can only be officially declared dead two years after the end of the conflict.

‘They’re appropriating the money that belongs to the families of the dead and wounded. Zelensky is used to stealing it via his proxies,’ Dmitruk said.

‘This law is just another way to legalize his crimes… Just imagine – two years after the end of the war, and we don’t know when and how it will end – yet they are already establishing this framework.’

Dmitruk, who once belonged to Zelensky’s Servant of the People party, described Ukraine’s current leadership as a ’party of war’ that has suppressed any dissent.

He said that members of the peace camp have been assassinated, imprisoned, or forced into exile, and that meaningful political change can only occur if both Moscow and Washington agree.

‘No good can be expected from this terrorist regime,’ Dmitruk said, arguing that only a change in government could open the way for real peace talks, and calling for an interim administration and fresh elections in Ukraine."

https://michaelwalshwriter.com/2025/06/07/out-of-control-monster-bred-and-fed-by-the-eu/

https://hindujudeofreemasonry.blogspot.com/

"Surprised? Greta Thunberg’s ‘coach’ a Soros, Bill and Melinda Gates operative

Luisa-Marie Neubauer, the “coach” of Greta Thunberg, is related to the founder of the Rothschild dynasty, Mayer Amschel Bauer, who changed his last name to Rothschild after returning to Frankfurt to take over his father’s business. Luisa Neubauers “job” is a climate activist and she volunteers for the ONE Campaign founded by Bono and Bill Gates, which also has ties to Soros.

Although she is Jewish through her father’s Rothschild lineage, her mother is part of a family of Nazi collaborators, the Reemstma family, one of the biggest tobacco and cigarette producers in Europe, whose scandals involving tax breaks during the Wiemar period were influential in destroying public trust in the government.

The Neubauers are also extremely influential throughout Racine, Wisconsin. Jeffrey Neubauer was Bill Clintons campaign manager for Wisconsin in 1992 and 1996, a member of the Wisconsin State Assembly and Chairman of the Wisconsin Democratic Party. He also has ties to education through his organization Higher Expectation for Racine County, and he will effectively be in control of 1 billion dollars being allocated to the Racine Unified School District through a rigged referendum recently endorsed by Joe Biden."

[Slightly more at the link]:
https://www.winterwatch.net/2022/02/greta-thunbergs-handler-luisa-marie-neubauer-is-a-rothschild/

‘Serbia has managed to achieve something that very few countries in Europe and the world have succeeded in doing -- increasing the fertility rate at a time when we identified it as our biggest problem,’ Tatjana Macura tells Anadolu

❝Serbia has managed to achieve something that very few countries in Europe and the world have succeeded in doing — increasing the fertility rate at a time when we identified it as our biggest problem❞… pic.twitter.com/FnhPfnaHpt [VID 1:09 min]

— Anadolu English (@anadoluagency) May 27, 2025

http://library.flawlesslogic.com/jtr_01.htm
[Short Excerpt below]

"In researching Jewish history, the investigator discovers a wide variance of written material. Work by authors expressly critical of Jews (and they include a surprisingly number of Jewish commentators, mostly "apostates" of one kind or another) is invariably labeled by today's political conventions to be "anti-Semitic" in nature. There is a large body of such material extending throughout history, written by critics wherever Jews were to be found. Some of the criticism is ridiculous; the accusations of Hitler are absurdly exaggerated. But other observations about Jewish life by non-Jews is startlingly consistent over two thousand years. Consistently credible Gentile themes in attacks against Jews include Jewish elitism, their insularity and clannishness, their disdain for non-Jews, their exploitive and deceptive behavior towards those not their own, the suspicion of Jewish national loyalties and allegiance to the lands they lived in, excessive Jewish proclivity for money and economic domination, and an economic "parasitism" (the concentration of Jews in lucrative non-productive fields of finance -- usury, money lending, etc. -- at the expense of non-Jewish communities).

"Anti-Semitism," remarks Oliver Cox, "is an ancient social attitude probably coeval with the rise of Jewish tribalism. It is thus an immemorial trait identified with Jewish culture ... Anti-Semitism has been identified with Jewish behavior in the sense that it is a reaction of other groups to the Jews' determination to assert and perpetuate their identity ... Unlike race prejudice ... anti-Semitism or intolerance is essentially an inherent social response -- a retaliation [against] the Jewish determination to resist merger of their civilization with that of a host people" (Cox, 183-184).

"The Jews," J. O. Hertzler writes, "... have been a supernation rather than members of a nation. More than any other people, certainly up to the time of the emancipation, they were innocent and irresponsible toward the national traditions and aspirations of the people among whom they lived" (Hertzler, 76).

"Hatred for the Jews," Abram Leon writes, "does not date solely from the birth of Christianity. Seneca treated the Jews as a criminal race. Juvenal believed that the Jews only existed to cause evil for other peoples. Quintilian said that Jews were a curse for other people" (Leon, 71).

In 59 BC the Roman statesman Cicero criticized Jewish "clannishness" and "influence in the assemblies." In the second century AD Celsus, one of Rome's great medical writers, wrote that Jews "pride themselves in possessing superior wisdom and disdain for the company of other men." Philostratus, an ancient Greek author, believed that Jews "have long since risen against humanity itself. They are men who have devised a misanthropic life, who share neither food nor drink with others." (Cf. Shakespeare's Merchant of Venice, I, iii.) The great Roman historian Tacitus (A.D. 56-120) declared that "the Jews are extremely loyal toward one another, and are always ready to show compassion [for their fellow Jews], but toward other people they feel only hate and enmity" (Morais, 46).

Centuries later Voltaire's criticism of Jews, in his Essai sur le Moeurs, repeated many of the same charges: "The Jewish nation dares to display an irreconcilable hatred toward all nations, and revolts against all masters; always superstitious, always greedy for the well-being enjoyed by others, always barbarous -- cringing in misfortune and insolent in prosperity." Ironically, as Jacob Katz observes, "Voltaire did more than any other single man to shape the rationalist trend that moved European society toward improving the status of the Jew" (Katz, 34).

Still historically remembered (according to the Encyclopedia Britannica, 1994) "as a crusader against tyranny and bigotry," Voltaire turned repeatedly and angrily against Jews who he believed to epitomize such "tyranny and bigotry." Jews, he complained, "are ... the greatest scoundrels who have ever sullied the face of the globe ... They are, all of them, born with raging fanaticism in their hearts, just as the Bretons and Germans are born with blond hair. I would not in the least be surprised if these people would not some day become deadly to the human race ... You [Jews] have surpassed all nations in impertinent fables, in bad conduct, and in barbarism. You deserve to be punished, for this is your destiny" (Gould, 91). On another occasion Voltaire charged that "the Jew does not belong to any place except that place which he makes money; would he not just as easily betray the King on behalf of the Emperor as he would the Emperor for the King?" (Katz, 44). Thirty of 118 of Voltaire's essays in his Dictionary of Philosophy address Jews, usually disparagingly. Voltaire calls Jews "our masters and our enemies ... whom we detest ... the most abominable people in the world."

With the coming of the Enlightenment, as David Sorkin notes, "Jews were roundly condemned for "their ritualistic religion, national character or economic situation which, separately or together, prevented them from being moral. Enlightenment thinkers almost without exception subscribed to this image of Jewish inferiority" (Sorkin, 85). "The ghetto," Enlightenment intellectuals argued, "had produced an essentially unacceptable culture. Jews were utter strangers to Europe. Social isolation had created traits in need of drastic transformation: Jews harbored within them hatred of the Christian nurtured by centuries of Talmudic and rabbinic indoctrination, they were religious fanatics, parasitic in their economics and dishonest in their dealings" (Aschheim, 6).

"Know that wherever there is money," said Montesquieu in his Persian Letters, "there is the Jew" (Krefetz, 45)."

[CONTINUES]:
http://library.flawlesslogic.com/jtr_01.htm

"Antisemitism" is merely a slandering label which the jews use against all people with enough intelligence to expose the real effects of jews
-----X

Beneath all Contempt, September 22, 2008
.
Just the one question...

To which group of people have the following stinging epithets most commonly been applied:-

Vampires,
vultures,
locusts,
rats,
rodents,
vermin,
scavengers,
liars,
fraudsters,
shysters,
blood-suckers,
leeches,
cockroaches?"

Please choose one of the following:-

a) Gypsies
b) Homosexuals
c) Lesbians
d) Jews
e) White folks
f) Negroes
g) Nips
h) Chinks
i) Eskimos
j) Druggies
k) Communists
l) Pan-handlers
m) the Mafia

Correct! Even though you only had a one in 13 chance of being right, you were! And you don't even need your correct answer confirmed!

https://worldpeace-phaedrus.blogspot.com/2008/09/beneath-all-contempt.html
http://worldpeace-phaedrus.blogspot.com/

Nicholas Stix, October 04, 2005


Imagine if one demographic group in America were 33 times more prone to commit crimes than another group. How would you feel about the relatively crime-prone group? The relatively crime-free group? Wouldn't you want to know about such differences?

But we don't have to imagine anything. The above contrast was not a hypothetical case, but rather the statistical relationship of black to Asian crime in America, as detailed in the ground-breaking new report, The Color of Crime [available here in PDF], released by the New Century Foundation, the organization that sponsors American Renaissance magazine.

* "... between 2001 and 2003, blacks were 39 times more likely to commit violent crimes against whites than the reverse, and 136 times more likely to commit robbery."

* Between 2001 and 2003, blacks committed, on average, 15,400 black-on-white rapes per year, while whites averaged only 900 white-on-black rapes per year.

* "Of the nearly 770,000 violent interracial crimes committed every year involving blacks and whites, blacks commit 85 percent and whites commit 15 percent."

But there are five-and-one-half as many whites as blacks. If anything, the numbers should be reversed. After all, as leftists always tell us, all groups are supposed to be equally represented in all categories, for good or ill. (Well, not really. Leftists never call on the NBA and NFL to institute racial parity for white players.)

* Nationally, youth gangs are 90 percent non-white. "Hispanics are 19 times more likely than whites to be members of youth gangs. Blacks are 15 times more likely, and Asians are nine times more likely."

* The only crime category in which Asians are more heavily represented than whites is illegal gambling.

* "Blacks commit more violent crime against whites than against blacks. Forty-five percent of their victims are white, 43 percent are black, and 10 percent are Hispanic. When whites commit violent crime, only three percent of their victims are black."

But how can that be, when for years commentators of all political persuasions have insisted that the majority of the victims of black crime were themselves black? But it has been true for some time, because blacks increasingly target whites based on the color of the latter's skin. The commentators have been guilty variously of lying and laziness.

* Far from being guilty of "racially profiling" innocent blacks, police have been exercising racial bias on behalf of blacks, arresting fewer blacks than their proportion of criminals: "... blacks who committed crimes that were reported to the police were 26 percent less likely to be arrested than people of other races who committed the same crimes."

* "... police are determined to arrest non-black rather than black criminals." (I have seen this practice in operation on the streets and subways of New York.)

* "[Blacks] are eight times more likely than people of other races to rob someone, for example, and 5.5 times more likely to steal a car."

Well, as everyone knows, innocent blacks get rounded up by the police all the time, so we can safely ignore such statistics. After all, isn't that what the NAACP, Village Voice, New York Times, and countless black "activists" and prominent academics have been saying for years? After all, although the folks insisting on racial profiling have no facts to back up their claims, they enjoy political prestige and moral authority. The Color of Crime, meanwhile, is based merely on lowly facts. As we shall see, prominent people are already saying that we should ignore The Color of Crime, because it wasn't produced by the right sort of people. (And of course, "the right sort of people" doesn't tell the truth about race and crime.)

* Charges of racial profiling, which maintain that police target innocent black motorists for traffic stops notwithstanding, a 2002 study by Maryland's Public Service Research Institute found that police were stopping too few black speeders (23%), compared to their proportion of actual speeders (25%). In fact, "blacks were twice as likely to speed as whites" in general, and there was an even higher frequency of black speeders in the 90-mph and higher range.

* "... the only evidence for police bias is disproportionate arrest rates for those groups police critics say are the targets of bias. High black arrest rates appear to reflect high crime rates, not police misconduct."

* Blacks not only commit violent crimes at far higher rates than non-blacks, but their crimes are more violent than those of whites. Blacks are three times as likely as non-blacks to commit assault with guns, and twice as likely as non-blacks to commit assault with knives.

* Blacks not only commit violent crimes at far higher rates than whites, but blacks commit "white collar" offenses -- fraud, bribery, racketeering and embezzlement, respectively -- at two to five times the white rate.

* The single greatest indicator of an area's crime rate is not poverty or education, but race and ethnicity. Even when one controls for income and education, the black crime rate is much higher than the white rate.

Things are actually much worse than the above notes suggest. As The Color of Crime notes, the feds inflate white crime statistics by counting Hispanic offenders as white; at the same time, "Hispanics are a [hate crime] victim category but not a perpetrator category. If someone attacks a Mexican for racial reasons, he becomes a Hispanic victim of a hate crime. However, if the same Mexican commits a hate crime against a black, he is classified as a 'white' perpetrator. Even more absurdly, if a Mexican commits a hate crime against a white, both victim and perpetrator are reported as white." Thus, the number of white perpetrators is bloated, while the number of white victims is constricted by the federal double-standard.

But things are even worse than the study shows. It fails to note, with black-on-white male prison rape an institutionalized sport among black inmates, that hundreds of thousands of white men have thus been victimized but never counted by the government. Meanwhile, white-on-black male prison rape is virtually non-existent.

Some of the study's many sources were the FBI's uniform crime reports (UCRs); the feds' National Crime Victimization Study (NCVS), in which 149,000 people across the country, in statistical proportion to all demographic groups, were called; the National Incident-Based Reporting System (NIBRS); Supplemental Homicide Reports (SHRs); State Court Processing Statistics (SCPS); National Youth Gang Survey; Federal Justice Statistics Program (FJSP); and National Corrections Reporting Program (NCRP). The succinct report slays dragons in the course of mere footnotes, such as its nailing of tenured California State University criminology professor Phyllis B. Gerstenfeld, who in her book Hate Crimes: Causes, Controls and Controversies, the reality of interracial violence be damned, depicted whites only as perpetrators, and not as the victims of hate crimes.

The Color of Crime -- not to be confused with a 1998 piece of propaganda of the same name by tenured University of Maryland professor of criminology, Katheryn K. Russell -- is the most scientifically rigorous research on crime and race available. It's the state of the art.

The mainstream media will surely be anxious to publicize and discuss The Color of Crime. After all, hasn't the public been inundated since the late 1990s (and ultimately, since the 1960s) with dubious charges of racism ("racial profiling") against law enforcement and the justice system? And don't the MSM always tell us that they will report on anything newsworthy? After all, the New York Times claims to be "the newspaper of record."

In a future column, we shall see just how the MSM has responded to The Color of Crime.

In any event, the report gave in precise numbers what any sentient being over the age of twenty and living in the United States has long known. A 75-year-old Irish neighbor of mine is a retired nurse who was run out of a once-lovely Brooklyn neighborhood forty years ago by "integration" (read: brazen black crime in broad daylight). During a friendly conversation during a quiet morning on our peaceful street last spring she said, "The problem is ... you know what the problem is."

http://library.flawlesslogic.com/color.htm