I've never understood this "you're on your own" bullshit I've seen other whites do. You should be doing everything you can to promote your children as long as possible.
For example in my family we had our parents co-sign loans until we were 30. Why not? Now you are starting out life with an 840 credit score. Giving less money to the bank. "No son, I'm teaching you a lesson. You need to start out life with a poor negotiating position and give free money to banks just to build leverage later." You are just feeding the next generation to banks because your parents didn't trust you. Raise your kids right and you don't have to worry.
I say we'd cosign as long as possible. That was houses. For cars we would handle that with internal loans, meaning banks get nothing. On one car I did do a co-sign and thus got a 2% interest rate on a car with a credit union. There are people paying 16% on a car. I was paying under inflation. Practically negative interest rate.
If you abandon your family just because they turn 18 you are just a belated nigger. "But life's not fair and I need them to learn that." Whites make the world more fair. Be white. You are pissing away what little intergenerational advantage you have with that mentality. Of course it will never snowball after a few generations if someone throws it away. Intergenerational wealth comes from many generations not doing that. You want to adopt traditionalism? Real traditionalism is you pass on every advantage you can.
Sharing your credit score is free.. unless you have bad kids. If so that's your fault. You should be teaching them finance in elementary school and middle school. The elite don't learn by sink or swim. They learn by actual teaching. Or they play sink or swim with something better like running a company and not something basic like running a life.
I was thinking about this and how much we need to not be happy with our republican congress.
The best DOGE is able to do right now in a lot of cases is put people on severance, or paid leave, or an insane exit deal. DOGE is doing a lot of good but they are forced to do good in the most questionably good way possible? Why? Because the federal government has insane labor policy.
This labor policy is set by congress. Congress could have cut the funding years ago but they didn't. If the executive branch has to be the ones to make cuts the very least congress could do is make it so we can actually fire people.
Is it worth delaying these exit deals until we can actually fire people? Maybe. I don't know. The question is if we can count on congress to actually do that. It's going to suck that we gave all the federal government 8 months pay to not work if it turns out we could have just fired them. But it would also suck to do nothing waiting for a day that will never come, waiting on another part of the government to come through.
We need to start pressing congress for an answer, are they going to make it so we can fire federal workers or not? I don't know why we can't get an indication of their plans this week.
Of course the first one is a real problem under Russian rule. The mature realization that no one wants to adopt is that there is no good side.
But in some ways the dictator that doesn't rule over me now is preferable to the mob of dictators that rule over me now. Cheering for the opposite side is a way to stick it to the people who think they are right in controlling you. Maybe if we cheered for the Russian people and the Russian people cheered for us it would completely blow the expectations our leaders have. Let's completely wreck their sense of control and love each other.
But I don't love Putin. I love the Russian people. And the Ukrainian people. Fuck Zilensky, fuck Putin, fuck the EU, fuck the US deep state, fuck Israel, fuck the Ayatollah. The sooner we stop showing respect to these people from any corner of the planet the better.
I can tell you that a lot of Virginia is going to get bleed over from Chesapeake more so than whatever the hell Appalachian/Highland South is. And there isn't enough Soul food labeled in Central VA. Anything near Richmond or I95 is niggerville, and then also Eastward toward Norfolk.
I have never eaten foraged anything and I don't know anyone who has. In fact we have more bleed over from carolina BBQ than we have whatever soup beans are.
That usually means you already have an account and used a different password. I see you exist. I see you don't have any content yet. I could delete your user and let you recreate it with the password you want if you'd like.
Ah, so we are in agreement. The way I read your intent initially was that there wasn't room for nuance in the meaning of a word. Cool. Glad we're on the same page.
It's an innate part of English language. If you want to be ignorant of how a language works then you are choosing to be as retarded as the left on this issue.
Next you'll tell me I'm wrong because English refers to the English people and we're American, or that the left brain is actually quite smart.
Sadly English supports multiple definitions for a single word and the left takes advantage of this to muddy the waters.
I think there is another useful definition of Racism which is the application of race within ideology or policy.
To believe differences exist isn't inherently ideological or political because that's just an acceptance of reality or a belief about it. We'll call your definition racism1 and mine racism2 (though both are solid dictionary definitions).
In this thinking that black people are dumb would not be racism2 but setting up a racially aligned immigration policy would be racism2. Not that there is anything wrong with that. But racism2 is more open for debate if it is inherently morally wrong. The left assumes the answer to that is yes. And then because racism2 and racism1 share a common word they transfer the rhetoric against racism2 and apply it to racism1, and say that any view that differences exist is unacceptable. But a processing of reality can never be unacceptable unless we are living in 1984.
Also racism3 exists which is the individual choice to treat people of a different race differently. This is not political because your individual choices are not policy. And it may or may not be motivated by racism1 or racism2.
There are additional valid definitions. None of the prior ones actually covered hatred. racism1, racism2, and racism3 are all possible without a shred of hatred. So bam, racism4 is hatred on the basis of race.
All of them are absolutely solid definitions of racism, but also shouldn't be conflated with one another. Unfortunately that's how English works. It would be nice if words never had competing definitions, but they do.
The hope of the left being able to handle this correctly is none. In one part because they have no incentive to not conflate things. And two because they can't even keep entirely different words separate. Capitalism is patriarchy is racism is nazism is fascism is heteronormativism. To them only around three distinct concepts exist in the world.
I agree with Hans Herman Hoppe. Complete believer in the non-aggression principle as a matter of ethics, and that someone else needs to commit aggression first before I have license to commit aggression back.
But his take is that if you are insistently demanding things from other people and stirring up mobs to punish people who don't meet your demands you are an aggressor. You need to get punched in the face.
I don't care if it's about gender or any other topic. If you are demanding things from other people who you have no relationship with then you need to get punched in the face.
I kind of believe it because they don't reproduce. They don't want to be a major part of the population because they are parasites. They are more into multiplying power instead of multiplying numbers. That and emigrating to Israel.
So yeah, 1.2 million died of all causes in WWII, and then they stayed flat. That's possible.
Ok. I looked it up. This will be fun. Pre-war, 9.5 million. 2010 1.4 million.
Clearly they have been leaving. I think this is literally where he is getting his 8 million number from. I think a good milestone for us with be getting it to 1/10 what it was. 0.95 million soon.
Dang, chatgpt estimates we'll get there around 2050. Not fast enough to shed a mere 0.5.
Gaza pre-genocide has 2.2 million. If Trump does his Riviera of the Middle East we need to demand two priorities. The Gazans get absorbed into other Middle Easter countries, ideally into Israel directly. All of the current 1.4 jews in Europe move to there.
That's exactly why he is there. The US deep state wanted to not have peace so they install Zelensky, to turn Ukraine into a pawn gambit. As far as Zelensky is concerned he's doing the job he was hired to do and getting the promised personal wealth for doing it.
Even if you bought the worlds fare calamity bullshit, the theory is that calamity hit after the worlds fare and that's the real start of our modern history (everything before then is fake). So wouldn't they have the incubators after the fare, after the destruction, and not during?
That reminds me of when they put poison in alcohol during prohibition or when they put bleach in food a group illegally made for the homeless.
If you really want people to stop jay walking make it so the cars don't stop. If you want fewer people to die making the trek across the border start shooting people who cross it.
x0x7 2 points 3 months ago
Dang. I just wish it could actually code.
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=67c7f5cd93541
x0x7 13 points 3 months ago
I've never understood this "you're on your own" bullshit I've seen other whites do. You should be doing everything you can to promote your children as long as possible.
For example in my family we had our parents co-sign loans until we were 30. Why not? Now you are starting out life with an 840 credit score. Giving less money to the bank. "No son, I'm teaching you a lesson. You need to start out life with a poor negotiating position and give free money to banks just to build leverage later." You are just feeding the next generation to banks because your parents didn't trust you. Raise your kids right and you don't have to worry.
I say we'd cosign as long as possible. That was houses. For cars we would handle that with internal loans, meaning banks get nothing. On one car I did do a co-sign and thus got a 2% interest rate on a car with a credit union. There are people paying 16% on a car. I was paying under inflation. Practically negative interest rate.
If you abandon your family just because they turn 18 you are just a belated nigger. "But life's not fair and I need them to learn that." Whites make the world more fair. Be white. You are pissing away what little intergenerational advantage you have with that mentality. Of course it will never snowball after a few generations if someone throws it away. Intergenerational wealth comes from many generations not doing that. You want to adopt traditionalism? Real traditionalism is you pass on every advantage you can.
Sharing your credit score is free.. unless you have bad kids. If so that's your fault. You should be teaching them finance in elementary school and middle school. The elite don't learn by sink or swim. They learn by actual teaching. Or they play sink or swim with something better like running a company and not something basic like running a life.
/v/Whichever viewpost?postid=67c7a80de08e9
x0x7 2 points 3 months ago*
I was thinking about this and how much we need to not be happy with our republican congress.
The best DOGE is able to do right now in a lot of cases is put people on severance, or paid leave, or an insane exit deal. DOGE is doing a lot of good but they are forced to do good in the most questionably good way possible? Why? Because the federal government has insane labor policy.
This labor policy is set by congress. Congress could have cut the funding years ago but they didn't. If the executive branch has to be the ones to make cuts the very least congress could do is make it so we can actually fire people.
Is it worth delaying these exit deals until we can actually fire people? Maybe. I don't know. The question is if we can count on congress to actually do that. It's going to suck that we gave all the federal government 8 months pay to not work if it turns out we could have just fired them. But it would also suck to do nothing waiting for a day that will never come, waiting on another part of the government to come through.
We need to start pressing congress for an answer, are they going to make it so we can fire federal workers or not? I don't know why we can't get an indication of their plans this week.
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=67c7136e52168
x0x7 2 points 3 months ago
Of course the first one is a real problem under Russian rule. The mature realization that no one wants to adopt is that there is no good side.
But in some ways the dictator that doesn't rule over me now is preferable to the mob of dictators that rule over me now. Cheering for the opposite side is a way to stick it to the people who think they are right in controlling you. Maybe if we cheered for the Russian people and the Russian people cheered for us it would completely blow the expectations our leaders have. Let's completely wreck their sense of control and love each other.
But I don't love Putin. I love the Russian people. And the Ukrainian people. Fuck Zilensky, fuck Putin, fuck the EU, fuck the US deep state, fuck Israel, fuck the Ayatollah. The sooner we stop showing respect to these people from any corner of the planet the better.
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=67c69ca410282
x0x7 1 point 3 months ago
There are a lot of people who have nothing to contribute to society besides being an asshole. It's the only thing they can do with their lives.
/v/funny viewpost?postid=67c5ec422bdde
x0x7 1 point 3 months ago
It will have fewer clowns.
/v/funny viewpost?postid=67c6720dea3f6
x0x7 2 points 3 months ago
I can tell you that a lot of Virginia is going to get bleed over from Chesapeake more so than whatever the hell Appalachian/Highland South is. And there isn't enough Soul food labeled in Central VA. Anything near Richmond or I95 is niggerville, and then also Eastward toward Norfolk.
I have never eaten foraged anything and I don't know anyone who has. In fact we have more bleed over from carolina BBQ than we have whatever soup beans are.
/v/Food viewpost?postid=67c66d58b7a50
x0x7 1 point 3 months ago
What's with the Israeli flag?
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=67c60abb268a6
x0x7 0 points 3 months ago
That usually means you already have an account and used a different password. I see you exist. I see you don't have any content yet. I could delete your user and let you recreate it with the password you want if you'd like.
/v/x0x7projects viewpost?postid=67c399319f571
x0x7 1 point 3 months ago
Ah, so we are in agreement. The way I read your intent initially was that there wasn't room for nuance in the meaning of a word. Cool. Glad we're on the same page.
/v/Racism viewpost?postid=67c5802c9ebe1
x0x7 2 points 3 months ago*
It's an innate part of English language. If you want to be ignorant of how a language works then you are choosing to be as retarded as the left on this issue.
Next you'll tell me I'm wrong because English refers to the English people and we're American, or that the left brain is actually quite smart.
/v/Racism viewpost?postid=67c5802c9ebe1
x0x7 1 point 3 months ago
This teaches bad habits. You shouldn't run in a warehouse.
/v/videos viewpost?postid=67c4e9524c9f8
x0x7 3 points 3 months ago*
Sadly English supports multiple definitions for a single word and the left takes advantage of this to muddy the waters.
I think there is another useful definition of Racism which is the application of race within ideology or policy.
To believe differences exist isn't inherently ideological or political because that's just an acceptance of reality or a belief about it. We'll call your definition racism1 and mine racism2 (though both are solid dictionary definitions).
In this thinking that black people are dumb would not be racism2 but setting up a racially aligned immigration policy would be racism2. Not that there is anything wrong with that. But racism2 is more open for debate if it is inherently morally wrong. The left assumes the answer to that is yes. And then because racism2 and racism1 share a common word they transfer the rhetoric against racism2 and apply it to racism1, and say that any view that differences exist is unacceptable. But a processing of reality can never be unacceptable unless we are living in 1984.
Also racism3 exists which is the individual choice to treat people of a different race differently. This is not political because your individual choices are not policy. And it may or may not be motivated by racism1 or racism2.
There are additional valid definitions. None of the prior ones actually covered hatred. racism1, racism2, and racism3 are all possible without a shred of hatred. So bam, racism4 is hatred on the basis of race.
All of them are absolutely solid definitions of racism, but also shouldn't be conflated with one another. Unfortunately that's how English works. It would be nice if words never had competing definitions, but they do.
The hope of the left being able to handle this correctly is none. In one part because they have no incentive to not conflate things. And two because they can't even keep entirely different words separate. Capitalism is patriarchy is racism is nazism is fascism is heteronormativism. To them only around three distinct concepts exist in the world.
/v/Racism viewpost?postid=67c5802c9ebe1
x0x7 2 points 3 months ago
Wait, but mango chips sound good. Probably their most ironic habit is coffee.
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=67c536be977fb
x0x7 4 points 3 months ago
He's Swedish. PewDiePie does have plans to take over Norway so presumable these are the guys who will fight his army of 9 year olds.
/v/funny viewpost?postid=67c45578c1503
x0x7 2 points 3 months ago
I live on a planet where everyone is experiencing high levels of dementia.
/v/Screenshot viewpost?postid=67c4046fc5182
x0x7 1 point 3 months ago
I agree with Hans Herman Hoppe. Complete believer in the non-aggression principle as a matter of ethics, and that someone else needs to commit aggression first before I have license to commit aggression back.
But his take is that if you are insistently demanding things from other people and stirring up mobs to punish people who don't meet your demands you are an aggressor. You need to get punched in the face.
I don't care if it's about gender or any other topic. If you are demanding things from other people who you have no relationship with then you need to get punched in the face.
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=67c3c7038bd21
x0x7 0 points 3 months ago
There was no accidental lab leak.
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=67c34e49a60cc
x0x7 0 points 3 months ago
I kind of believe it because they don't reproduce. They don't want to be a major part of the population because they are parasites. They are more into multiplying power instead of multiplying numbers. That and emigrating to Israel.
So yeah, 1.2 million died of all causes in WWII, and then they stayed flat. That's possible.
Ok. I looked it up. This will be fun. Pre-war, 9.5 million. 2010 1.4 million.
Clearly they have been leaving. I think this is literally where he is getting his 8 million number from. I think a good milestone for us with be getting it to 1/10 what it was. 0.95 million soon.
Dang, chatgpt estimates we'll get there around 2050. Not fast enough to shed a mere 0.5.
Gaza pre-genocide has 2.2 million. If Trump does his Riviera of the Middle East we need to demand two priorities. The Gazans get absorbed into other Middle Easter countries, ideally into Israel directly. All of the current 1.4 jews in Europe move to there.
/v/TIL viewpost?postid=67c2c9410b493
x0x7 5 points 3 months ago
Wouldn't believing a conspiracy mean like when a group of people conspire to make you afraid of a "deadly" virus and you believe them?
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=67c3140e75392
x0x7 2 points 3 months ago
That's exactly why he is there. The US deep state wanted to not have peace so they install Zelensky, to turn Ukraine into a pawn gambit. As far as Zelensky is concerned he's doing the job he was hired to do and getting the promised personal wealth for doing it.
/v/WorldNews viewpost?postid=67c24471af556
x0x7 0 points 3 months ago
Hamas are the good guys retard.
/v/Jews viewpost?postid=67c121b24afdf
x0x7 1 point 3 months ago
Even if you bought the worlds fare calamity bullshit, the theory is that calamity hit after the worlds fare and that's the real start of our modern history (everything before then is fake). So wouldn't they have the incubators after the fare, after the destruction, and not during?
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=67c1a9295ea9f
x0x7 0 points 3 months ago
This isn't for their browser.
/v/technology viewpost?postid=67c1b36db089f
x0x7 0 points 3 months ago
That reminds me of when they put poison in alcohol during prohibition or when they put bleach in food a group illegally made for the homeless.
If you really want people to stop jay walking make it so the cars don't stop. If you want fewer people to die making the trek across the border start shooting people who cross it.
/v/WhitePeopleThings viewpost?postid=67c080195495f