Because every time they actually do that, they find out that everybody prefers the White guy version. And that pesky fact gets in the way of their anti-White pro-Jewish agenda.
Go to https://matrix.arcanus.ungleich.cloud/#/group/+oag:arcanus.ungleich.cloud
Create a new account and save your Security Key or you won't be able to login again.
Join the Newcomers room.
Of course! Everything you ever heard about the Holocaust is real. Especially the rollercoasters, masturbation machines, bear and eagle, lampshades/soap made from humans, and pregnant women giving birth in the gas chambers. All of it is definitely absolutely completely 100% true. It's definitely NOT Jewish lies designed to make the Jews seem like victims so they can justify committing horrible atrocities against the world. Not at all!
They don't care about the facts because they are average 85 IQ, which is literally the level of retardation. Niggers literally cannot understand the *concept* of a fact, they can't even understand the concept of time:
I agree that not being able to watch is a minus. Maybe we can setup gladiator style arenas and have them fight bears? If that's too expensive, plain old rope does the job.
It's to the west of Germany, south of Norway, north of Belgium. The Dutch people are descended from the Germans. It's an advanced first world country (11th richest in the world) with 18 million people, so yeah they do have missiles. I don't know about open pit mining, their primary export is food, machinery, and electronics.
Oh, and as a second source, the decision was reaffirmed again in 2008 (which is 5 years AFTER the PROTECT Act): https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Williams_(2008)
The Court stated that "an offer to provide or request to receive virtual child pornography is not prohibited by the statute. A crime is committed only when the speaker believes or intends the listener to believe that the subject of the proposed transaction depicts real children. It is simply not true that this means 'a protected category of expression [will] inevitably be suppressed,' post, at 13. Simulated child pornography will be as available as ever."
Before the PROTECT Act there was an even stricter act called CPPA, which actually did ban fictional lolis.
However, that was deemed by the Supreme Court to be unconstitutional, because it infringed freedom of speech, and there were no actual child victims involved:
The Supreme Court thoroughly debunked all of the usual arguments, such as: "loli will lead to real pedophilia", "predators will use lolis to seduce real children", and "loli doesn't count as free speech".
That's why the PROTECT Act very specifically makes clear that it is only about real children.
As a meta note, your boomer tactics will never work, you will never convince people to stop because it's "illegal". That's like trying to tell people to stop pirating because it's "illegal".
There are legitimate arguments you could make against loli, but you don't make those arguments, instead you use very poor arguments and lies. The reason why children don't trust their parents and grandparents is because of retarded boomers saying retarded things. And because of that lack of trust, children are now easily indoctrinated and brainwashed.
Except the act absolutely does NOT outlaw it at all. It very specifically says "indistinguishable from depictions of real children". That cannot possibly be interpreted in any other way.
Numerous other sources also agree with me, that it does not apply to fictional characters, and it would hold up in court.
Of course the feds routinely ignore the law, so you could get arrested for it even if it's 100% legal, but the feds violating the law isn't anything new. You can also get arrested by the feds for exposing the kikes (even though that's free speech).
> (A) computer generate depictions of children that are indistinguishable from depictions of real children;
> (B) such visual depiction is a digital image, computer image, or computer-generated image that is, or is indistinguishable from, that of a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct;
But that has nothing to do with fictional cartoon characters, that's only for realistic images.
In fact, the article goes into extensive detail on their reasoning: they are worried that a criminal could claim that the (realistic) CP was "computer generated", and therefore avoid going to jail. So that's why that provision exists. It has nothing at all to do with fictional characters (like anime).
Mystiker 0 points 3.9 years ago
Amazon patented the ability to purchase a product from a website by clicking a button. Yes, really. The patent system is mindnumbingly retarded.
/v/oneangrygamer viewpost?postid=60985181340e3
Mystiker 1 point 3.9 years ago
I'd be a lot more concerned about all the rampant yuri and yaoi. Also the cucky "power of friendship" and "the villain is actually a good guy" tropes.
/v/oneangrygamer viewpost?postid=60b3abca815c4
Mystiker 5 points 3.9 years ago
It's actually a myth that "we only use 10% of our brains", we use 100% of our brain.
/v/oneangrygamer viewpost?postid=60b3abca815c4
Mystiker 0 points 3.9 years ago
3D printers have gotten goooooooooooood. You can make stuff like the FGC-9 too!
/v/oneangrygamer viewpost?postid=60ab2676a8fa7
Mystiker 0 points 3.9 years ago
Because every time they actually do that, they find out that everybody prefers the White guy version. And that pesky fact gets in the way of their anti-White pro-Jewish agenda.
/v/oneangrygamer viewpost?postid=60ab2676a8fa7
Mystiker 0 points 3.9 years ago
Did you save your Security Key? It will ask you for it when you login, you need it in order to see the messages.
/v/oneangrygamer viewpost?postid=6074fd547b04b
Mystiker 0 points 3.9 years ago
Are you sure that you're on the new server (the link I gave)? The old server won't work, we've abandoned it.
/v/oneangrygamer viewpost?postid=6074fd547b04b
Mystiker 1 point 3.9 years ago
Go to https://matrix.arcanus.ungleich.cloud/#/group/+oag:arcanus.ungleich.cloud
Create a new account and save your Security Key or you won't be able to login again.
Join the Newcomers room.
/v/oneangrygamer viewpost?postid=6074fd547b04b
Mystiker 0 points 4.0 years ago
Of course! Everything you ever heard about the Holocaust is real. Especially the rollercoasters, masturbation machines, bear and eagle, lampshades/soap made from humans, and pregnant women giving birth in the gas chambers. All of it is definitely absolutely completely 100% true. It's definitely NOT Jewish lies designed to make the Jews seem like victims so they can justify committing horrible atrocities against the world. Not at all!
/v/Hiddenlol viewpost?postid=60983bd45a054
Mystiker 0 points 4 years ago
Oh yeah? Well who brought the niggers to America? Who prevents people from defending themselves from niggers? I'll give you one guess.
/v/HDLunited viewpost?postid=6085edf214970
Mystiker 2 points 4 years ago
They don't care about the facts because they are average 85 IQ, which is literally the level of retardation. Niggers literally cannot understand the *concept* of a fact, they can't even understand the concept of time:
https://vikinglifeblog.wordpress.com/2018/04/04/morality-and-abstract-thinking-how-africans-may-differ-from-westerners/
https://www.reddit.com/r/DarkEnlightenment/comments/3h3bgn/kenyan_5year_olds_cant_recognize_their_reflection/
https://thealternativehypothesis.org/index.php/2016/06/11/racial-differences-in-self-control/
/v/HDLunited viewpost?postid=608578d51fda3
Mystiker 2 points 4 years ago
A better question is: when are kikes NOT lying their nuts off?
/v/HDLunited viewpost?postid=6085b09c78919
Mystiker 1 point 4 years ago
I agree that not being able to watch is a minus. Maybe we can setup gladiator style arenas and have them fight bears? If that's too expensive, plain old rope does the job.
/v/oneangrygamer viewpost?postid=60857b38a7bc9
Mystiker 1 point 4 years ago
Let's be real here, shipping them to Africa IS a death sentence. It's like Australia but way worse.
/v/oneangrygamer viewpost?postid=60857b38a7bc9
Mystiker 1 point 4 years ago
It's to the west of Germany, south of Norway, north of Belgium. The Dutch people are descended from the Germans. It's an advanced first world country (11th richest in the world) with 18 million people, so yeah they do have missiles. I don't know about open pit mining, their primary export is food, machinery, and electronics.
/v/oneangrygamer viewpost?postid=60857b38a7bc9
Mystiker 1 point 4 years ago
That's a funny way of saying "put 6 feet under".
/v/Hiddenlol viewpost?postid=608563775408a
Mystiker 1 point 4 years ago
But that's a worldwide nigger behavior, not special to Africa.
/v/HDLunited viewpost?postid=60855a99c7db3
Mystiker 2 points 4 years ago
They're also the only East Asian country that practices circumcision. Literally emasculating boys for no reason.
/v/oneangrygamer viewpost?postid=607be8eabb4e0
Mystiker 0 points 4 years ago
NSP is definitely about 20 years old.
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=6073349f5c89a
Mystiker 0 points 4 years ago
Hey, are you LoP-MkIV?
We have our new server up and running:
https://www.voat.xyz/viewpost.php?postid=605e243f48e2b&commentid=606acf8474d70
/v/oneangrygamer viewpost?postid=605e243f48e2b
Mystiker 0 points 4 years ago*
Oh, and as a second source, the decision was reaffirmed again in 2008 (which is 5 years AFTER the PROTECT Act): https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Williams_(2008)
The Court stated that "an offer to provide or request to receive virtual child pornography is not prohibited by the statute. A crime is committed only when the speaker believes or intends the listener to believe that the subject of the proposed transaction depicts real children. It is simply not true that this means 'a protected category of expression [will] inevitably be suppressed,' post, at 13. Simulated child pornography will be as available as ever."
/v/4Chan viewpost?postid=
Mystiker 0 points 4 years ago*
Of course I have sources, I am not a liar.
Before the PROTECT Act there was an even stricter act called CPPA, which actually did ban fictional lolis.
However, that was deemed by the Supreme Court to be unconstitutional, because it infringed freedom of speech, and there were no actual child victims involved:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ashcroft_v._Free_Speech_Coalition
The Supreme Court thoroughly debunked all of the usual arguments, such as: "loli will lead to real pedophilia", "predators will use lolis to seduce real children", and "loli doesn't count as free speech".
That's why the PROTECT Act very specifically makes clear that it is only about real children.
As a meta note, your boomer tactics will never work, you will never convince people to stop because it's "illegal". That's like trying to tell people to stop pirating because it's "illegal".
There are legitimate arguments you could make against loli, but you don't make those arguments, instead you use very poor arguments and lies. The reason why children don't trust their parents and grandparents is because of retarded boomers saying retarded things. And because of that lack of trust, children are now easily indoctrinated and brainwashed.
/v/4Chan viewpost?postid=
Mystiker 1 point 4 years ago*
Except the act absolutely does NOT outlaw it at all. It very specifically says "indistinguishable from depictions of real children". That cannot possibly be interpreted in any other way.
Numerous other sources also agree with me, that it does not apply to fictional characters, and it would hold up in court.
Of course the feds routinely ignore the law, so you could get arrested for it even if it's 100% legal, but the feds violating the law isn't anything new. You can also get arrested by the feds for exposing the kikes (even though that's free speech).
/v/4Chan viewpost?postid=606cf9b5e19b3
Mystiker 1 point 4 years ago*
Oh, you mean these?
> (A) computer generate depictions of children that are indistinguishable from depictions of real children;
> (B) such visual depiction is a digital image, computer image, or computer-generated image that is, or is indistinguishable from, that of a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct;
But that has nothing to do with fictional cartoon characters, that's only for realistic images.
In fact, the article goes into extensive detail on their reasoning: they are worried that a criminal could claim that the (realistic) CP was "computer generated", and therefore avoid going to jail. So that's why that provision exists. It has nothing at all to do with fictional characters (like anime).
/v/4Chan viewpost?postid=606cf9b5e19b3
Mystiker 1 point 4 years ago
Could you please cite the page and section which covers fictional cartoon characters?
/v/4Chan viewpost?postid=606cf9b5e19b3