This reads like @Crensch and Putt basically calls him out.
Who else was taking over subs and using "ProtectVoat" while having their bitch send tit pics?
@Crensch was trying to control how censorship worked on Voat and this was putt calling him out.
@HeyJames votes exactly like this motherfucker, too, and, of course, @HeyJames the dirty spic is in this thread pretending like this shit wasn't from him.
And any other large, expensive pieces of machinery.
Aircraft carriers? Jets? Also becoming pointless.
With preplanned routes, air gapped, shielded drones, that cost less than $1,000 can be used to sink virtually any ship.
Remote controlled machines are becoming a favorite of Mossad. Troops also going to be irrelevant.
The real battlefield is the Internet and AI has already put itself in a position to strike first at everything.
The question ultimately boils down to what a network of AI brains will decide is moral, fair or if morality and fairness won't play any role, at all, and we grow straight to Morlock and Eloi.
Google also leaves out the Hunter Biden fuckery. It's called a "limited hangout" where a limited amount of information is shown to prove wrong doing but the worst of it is hidden.
I'll reiterate: Neutron radiography equipment of today is far superior than what Oppenheimer had and anyone with a brain could fire it at a plutonium core. Why haven't they? Are you telling me North Korea hasn't tried this?
I understand very well. Uranium itself doesn't "explode" or "melt down" simply because it decays quickly. If uranium decayed extremely quickly (unnaturally so), it could produce more heat, possibly leading to overheating if confined (but not an explosion). Meltdowns (e.g., Fukushima) are caused by decay heat from fission products (not uranium itself). Explosions in reactors (e.g., Chernobyl) are from steam/hydrogen buildup or prompt criticality—not uranium decay.
So, what I hear out of you is that you didn't pass high school physics. Noted.
At this moment, uranium pellets coated in ceramics and graphite can maintain heat and, even with meltdown, are contained and safe. The outer casing is designed to block the dangerous radiation. This has been in existence for at least 20+ years. There is no reason these small power plants powered with these pellets can't be all over the place.
I invite you to go to Hiroshima and look at Ground Zero. There is a building there... still standing, which means we have conventional weapons that are stronger. But, even worse, there is no directional wave form the epicenter, indicating Hiroshima was firebombed along with the 375 other locations in Japan we firebombed in the same year.
Reaching super criticality is purportedly achieved by firing neutron bullets at the center of plutonium or enriched uranium. But, we can fire at gold for back scattering experiments and this apparatus is easily obtainable by anyone who potentially wants a nuclear weapon.
Just like we STILL can't go back to the moon, with more technology and knowledge, state actors are STILL not capable of building nuclear weapons on their own.
Plus, you have to trust a bunch of jews like oppenheimer were truthful and credible for the entire storyline to be believable.
Let's assume a small group of jews was lying about their invention. Just for a moment. Now, ask yourself, in this moment, do we believe they were the only group of people with the technology and were smart enough to build two bombs to drop on Japan and somehow no one has ever figured it out since?
Add to that the fakery in the nuclear test videos. The Chinese ones are the most telling as they have guys on horses with gas masks riding towards the explosions with fire trucks and fire hoses. Some nuclear test videos are obvious fakery.
And, do you know who was in charge of curating that footage for the Americans? The same person who curated the JFK assassination videos. I'd be curious of his involvement in the moon landing videos, as well.
(tl;dr Neutron radiography equipment of today is far superior than what Oppenheimer had and anyone with a brain could fire it at a plutonium core. Why haven't they? Are you telling me North Korea hasn't tried this?)
You demonstrate how few have actually read the court files.
1) Giuffre's court pleading not only discussed girls as young as 8, she included a picture from Epsteins house of a nude 9 yo girl inline in the pleading so nobody could ignore it. Yet everyone seems to know nothing of this.
2) Maxwell was extorting and intimidating people for control of their babies; newborn infants.
So... I don't blame you, but I use you as an example of someone who is on a non normie layer of the Internet and still doesn't know this.
Belgium went without a federal government for years after banning Vlaams Bloc, which later rebranded to Vlaams Belaang and took power, causing another years long shut down.
Basically, whenever whitey got back into power, (((everyone))) stepped in and said "No."
Point being, Belgium has a tax structure that is opposite of the US. The majority of your tax money is for locals, and only a smidgen goes to the top. So, Belgium ran very well without a federal government.
I don't recall much from government in my time in the Netherlands, but I believe it is closer to Belgium in that sense that the US; whose tax pyramid is totally upside down.
Be friends with women and don't try to bang them. Eventually, you will find one out of your league who is perplexed you aren't trying to hit on her and you will find a real relationship.
Let me tell you how it really works:
You are looking for a good mood situation, laughing and pose the question, "So what are you into"? or "What floats your boat"? fit it within the context of the situation. Use ---light-- double entendres. This is a "green light moment" if you aren't repelled by her.
From there, you work in closer and use "the triangle", which is where you look at one of her eyes, then the other one of her eyes, then her mouth. If she starts doing the same, and repeats or mimics this, move in for the kiss. That is the second green light.
After that, it is up to you to be able to physically turn her on.
Getting into situations with high value women around also requires you to be high value. Adjust your hunting grounds accordingly.
And, depending on how old you are and how much money you have, SERIOUSLY CONSIDER finding a massage therapist who will give you some release, then chip down the price each visit. It is SO much cheaper than dating.
Online dating is stupid. Online friend meet up groups are better.
Think about how much money you spend to take a single online connection out.
$100? $200? Plus the time and effort?
So, to go out and meet a bunch of women through online dating, you've now spent a couple thousand in a month and possibly not gotten laid, at all, and, even if you got laid, the odds of it being an organic "click" are slime.
Keep in mind; online dating is a business model and algorithm in the background that has nothing to do with trying to find you a good partner.
Point being, the right masseuse will be cheaper than dating and you'll be getting off.
If you're younger, focus on building your value and hanging out with high value women.
If you're older and divorced, pay a girl who isn't a pro to help you out a few times a month.
Plenty of married people have pretty good sex lives into their 40s and 50s, but most don't. A wife is far more expensive than the right masseuse.
Personally, I would never bang a hooker.
My advice is based on the sea of divorced friends I have.
MeyerLansky 1 point 1 week ago
He's trying his best. It'd help if you put on some make up, once in a while.
/v/ShitpostLitterBox viewpost?postid=6844fdf464c32
MeyerLansky 0 points 1 week ago
This does not read like @AOU's writing.
This reads like @Crensch and Putt basically calls him out.
Who else was taking over subs and using "ProtectVoat" while having their bitch send tit pics?
@Crensch was trying to control how censorship worked on Voat and this was putt calling him out.
@HeyJames votes exactly like this motherfucker, too, and, of course, @HeyJames the dirty spic is in this thread pretending like this shit wasn't from him.
/v/Poal viewpost?postid=66f2ecf77cf5a
MeyerLansky 8 points 1 week ago
CIA
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=6844dd7566c30
MeyerLansky 4 points 1 week ago
He is the most closeted homosexual I have ever heard of and people need to stop giving him air time or a second thought.
However, my reason for commenting is that I think @Sal_180 and Andrew Tate would make the perfect gay couple. You should reach out.
/v/news viewpost?postid=6844f4e7c2b0c
MeyerLansky 0 points 1 week ago
And any other large, expensive pieces of machinery.
Aircraft carriers? Jets? Also becoming pointless.
With preplanned routes, air gapped, shielded drones, that cost less than $1,000 can be used to sink virtually any ship.
Remote controlled machines are becoming a favorite of Mossad. Troops also going to be irrelevant.
The real battlefield is the Internet and AI has already put itself in a position to strike first at everything.
The question ultimately boils down to what a network of AI brains will decide is moral, fair or if morality and fairness won't play any role, at all, and we grow straight to Morlock and Eloi.
/v/Military viewpost?postid=6844d7276f532
MeyerLansky 0 points 1 week ago
Google also leaves out the Hunter Biden fuckery. It's called a "limited hangout" where a limited amount of information is shown to prove wrong doing but the worst of it is hidden.
/v/PoliticalMemes viewpost?postid=68435d362f15a
MeyerLansky 0 points 1 week ago
I'll reiterate: Neutron radiography equipment of today is far superior than what Oppenheimer had and anyone with a brain could fire it at a plutonium core. Why haven't they? Are you telling me North Korea hasn't tried this?
/v/videos viewpost?postid=68433be2db69b
MeyerLansky 1 point 1 week ago
But, they appreciate having allies like you. They told me to remind you to put the post it back on your webcam. It fell off again.
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=6842a3fde5f9c
MeyerLansky 0 points 1 week ago*
I understand very well. Uranium itself doesn't "explode" or "melt down" simply because it decays quickly. If uranium decayed extremely quickly (unnaturally so), it could produce more heat, possibly leading to overheating if confined (but not an explosion). Meltdowns (e.g., Fukushima) are caused by decay heat from fission products (not uranium itself). Explosions in reactors (e.g., Chernobyl) are from steam/hydrogen buildup or prompt criticality—not uranium decay.
So, what I hear out of you is that you didn't pass high school physics. Noted.
At this moment, uranium pellets coated in ceramics and graphite can maintain heat and, even with meltdown, are contained and safe. The outer casing is designed to block the dangerous radiation. This has been in existence for at least 20+ years. There is no reason these small power plants powered with these pellets can't be all over the place.
I invite you to go to Hiroshima and look at Ground Zero. There is a building there... still standing, which means we have conventional weapons that are stronger. But, even worse, there is no directional wave form the epicenter, indicating Hiroshima was firebombed along with the 375 other locations in Japan we firebombed in the same year.
Reaching super criticality is purportedly achieved by firing neutron bullets at the center of plutonium or enriched uranium. But, we can fire at gold for back scattering experiments and this apparatus is easily obtainable by anyone who potentially wants a nuclear weapon.
Just like we STILL can't go back to the moon, with more technology and knowledge, state actors are STILL not capable of building nuclear weapons on their own.
Plus, you have to trust a bunch of jews like oppenheimer were truthful and credible for the entire storyline to be believable.
Let's assume a small group of jews was lying about their invention. Just for a moment. Now, ask yourself, in this moment, do we believe they were the only group of people with the technology and were smart enough to build two bombs to drop on Japan and somehow no one has ever figured it out since?
Add to that the fakery in the nuclear test videos. The Chinese ones are the most telling as they have guys on horses with gas masks riding towards the explosions with fire trucks and fire hoses. Some nuclear test videos are obvious fakery.
And, do you know who was in charge of curating that footage for the Americans? The same person who curated the JFK assassination videos. I'd be curious of his involvement in the moon landing videos, as well.
(tl;dr Neutron radiography equipment of today is far superior than what Oppenheimer had and anyone with a brain could fire it at a plutonium core. Why haven't they? Are you telling me North Korea hasn't tried this?)
/v/videos viewpost?postid=68433be2db69b
MeyerLansky 5 points 1 week ago
You demonstrate how few have actually read the court files.
1) Giuffre's court pleading not only discussed girls as young as 8, she included a picture from Epsteins house of a nude 9 yo girl inline in the pleading so nobody could ignore it. Yet everyone seems to know nothing of this.
2) Maxwell was extorting and intimidating people for control of their babies; newborn infants.
So... I don't blame you, but I use you as an example of someone who is on a non normie layer of the Internet and still doesn't know this.
/v/PoliticalMemes viewpost?postid=68435d362f15a
MeyerLansky 1 point 1 week ago
Nukes are fake and gay. Uranium is dangerous because individuals can build their own power plants and usurp the energy cartel.
/v/videos viewpost?postid=68433be2db69b
MeyerLansky 2 points 1 week ago
NSA brokering your data through 5 Eyes alliance that is really more like 5 Trillion Eyes.
/v/technology viewpost?postid=684368441535d
MeyerLansky 4 points 1 week ago
Isn't @HeyJames just your alt account?
/v/OccidentalEnclave viewpost?postid=684361857c41a
MeyerLansky 1 point 1 week ago
Japanese toilets implement technology superior to what the US had in the 1960s.
You mean to tell me we STILL can't get back to the moon?
/v/technology viewpost?postid=6842f0a70b8bf
MeyerLansky 1 point 1 week ago
They already knew, Paul.
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=6842a3fde5f9c
MeyerLansky 4 points 1 week ago
WWE script writers now writing for politics.
/v/twitter viewpost?postid=6842d95225594
MeyerLansky 1 point 1 week ago
when 4chan posts glow so hard you know the subject being discussed is a psyop
/v/4Chan viewpost?postid=684261fb1e917
MeyerLansky 0 points 1 week ago
Your information streams seem like they're getting a bit stale.
/v/Health viewpost?postid=68427378955b7
MeyerLansky 2 points 1 week ago
It's all theatrics so that nobody at the top ever gets in trouble.
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=6841f63f93328
MeyerLansky 2 points 1 week ago
Hey, moron, if you'd bothered to inform yourself and actually read the pleadings, there were pictures of nude girls as young as 8.
Why do you work so hard to prove you have no credibility?
/v/ClownWorld viewpost?postid=6842097f558c0
MeyerLansky 3 points 2 weeks ago
God bless gullible women.
Good work finding a shortcut.
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=6840f5236fce9
MeyerLansky 2 points 2 weeks ago
Belgium went without a federal government for years after banning Vlaams Bloc, which later rebranded to Vlaams Belaang and took power, causing another years long shut down.
Basically, whenever whitey got back into power, (((everyone))) stepped in and said "No."
Point being, Belgium has a tax structure that is opposite of the US. The majority of your tax money is for locals, and only a smidgen goes to the top. So, Belgium ran very well without a federal government.
I don't recall much from government in my time in the Netherlands, but I believe it is closer to Belgium in that sense that the US; whose tax pyramid is totally upside down.
/v/OccidentalEnclave viewpost?postid=6840ec3ce76d2
MeyerLansky 1 point 2 weeks ago
Okay, lay it on us. What have you got?
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=6840f5236fce9
MeyerLansky 4 points 2 weeks ago
Don't be friends with cock blockers.
Be friends with women and don't try to bang them. Eventually, you will find one out of your league who is perplexed you aren't trying to hit on her and you will find a real relationship.
Let me tell you how it really works:
You are looking for a good mood situation, laughing and pose the question, "So what are you into"? or "What floats your boat"? fit it within the context of the situation. Use ---light-- double entendres. This is a "green light moment" if you aren't repelled by her.
From there, you work in closer and use "the triangle", which is where you look at one of her eyes, then the other one of her eyes, then her mouth. If she starts doing the same, and repeats or mimics this, move in for the kiss. That is the second green light.
After that, it is up to you to be able to physically turn her on.
Getting into situations with high value women around also requires you to be high value. Adjust your hunting grounds accordingly.
And, depending on how old you are and how much money you have, SERIOUSLY CONSIDER finding a massage therapist who will give you some release, then chip down the price each visit. It is SO much cheaper than dating.
Online dating is stupid. Online friend meet up groups are better.
Think about how much money you spend to take a single online connection out.
$100? $200? Plus the time and effort?
So, to go out and meet a bunch of women through online dating, you've now spent a couple thousand in a month and possibly not gotten laid, at all, and, even if you got laid, the odds of it being an organic "click" are slime.
Keep in mind; online dating is a business model and algorithm in the background that has nothing to do with trying to find you a good partner.
Point being, the right masseuse will be cheaper than dating and you'll be getting off.
If you're younger, focus on building your value and hanging out with high value women.
If you're older and divorced, pay a girl who isn't a pro to help you out a few times a month.
Plenty of married people have pretty good sex lives into their 40s and 50s, but most don't. A wife is far more expensive than the right masseuse.
Personally, I would never bang a hooker.
My advice is based on the sea of divorced friends I have.
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=6840f5236fce9
MeyerLansky 1 point 2 weeks ago
That's your cue, @GreenSaint.
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=6840c4855a951