Separating? Don't you mean sufficiently bombarding with sustained neutron flux? I'm not sure you really know what you're talking about, based on that. Which begs the question as to why you're so concerned arguing about it.
What does stuxnet have to do with it? Nothing, other than Iran had breeder reactors that seemingly worked.
The Manhattan Project had a small group of people who weren't compartmentalized pieces. Less than a thousand, maybe even about 100. Everyone else involved had no idea of the big picture, even if some of them were informed of the main goal.
This means, the leader of the small core group had to be trusted to disseminate what and to whom and he was... jewish.
When the test finally came, they set up two groups to test against the bomb. One group was told they were to set up TNT to see if it matched the size of the bomb being set off. Then, the other group was told the same thing and now both groups are convinced they witnessed a nuclear explosion.
This reads like @Crensch and Putt basically calls him out.
Who else was taking over subs and using "ProtectVoat" while having their bitch send tit pics?
@Crensch was trying to control how censorship worked on Voat and this was putt calling him out.
@HeyJames votes exactly like this motherfucker, too, and, of course, @HeyJames the dirty spic is in this thread pretending like this shit wasn't from him.
And any other large, expensive pieces of machinery.
Aircraft carriers? Jets? Also becoming pointless.
With preplanned routes, air gapped, shielded drones, that cost less than $1,000 can be used to sink virtually any ship.
Remote controlled machines are becoming a favorite of Mossad. Troops also going to be irrelevant.
The real battlefield is the Internet and AI has already put itself in a position to strike first at everything.
The question ultimately boils down to what a network of AI brains will decide is moral, fair or if morality and fairness won't play any role, at all, and we grow straight to Morlock and Eloi.
Google also leaves out the Hunter Biden fuckery. It's called a "limited hangout" where a limited amount of information is shown to prove wrong doing but the worst of it is hidden.
I'll reiterate: Neutron radiography equipment of today is far superior than what Oppenheimer had and anyone with a brain could fire it at a plutonium core. Why haven't they? Are you telling me North Korea hasn't tried this?
I understand very well. Uranium itself doesn't "explode" or "melt down" simply because it decays quickly. If uranium decayed extremely quickly (unnaturally so), it could produce more heat, possibly leading to overheating if confined (but not an explosion). Meltdowns (e.g., Fukushima) are caused by decay heat from fission products (not uranium itself). Explosions in reactors (e.g., Chernobyl) are from steam/hydrogen buildup or prompt criticality—not uranium decay.
So, what I hear out of you is that you didn't pass high school physics. Noted.
At this moment, uranium pellets coated in ceramics and graphite can maintain heat and, even with meltdown, are contained and safe. The outer casing is designed to block the dangerous radiation. This has been in existence for at least 20+ years. There is no reason these small power plants powered with these pellets can't be all over the place.
I invite you to go to Hiroshima and look at Ground Zero. There is a building there... still standing, which means we have conventional weapons that are stronger. But, even worse, there is no directional wave form the epicenter, indicating Hiroshima was firebombed along with the 375 other locations in Japan we firebombed in the same year.
Reaching super criticality is purportedly achieved by firing neutron bullets at the center of plutonium or enriched uranium. But, we can fire at gold for back scattering experiments and this apparatus is easily obtainable by anyone who potentially wants a nuclear weapon.
Just like we STILL can't go back to the moon, with more technology and knowledge, state actors are STILL not capable of building nuclear weapons on their own.
Plus, you have to trust a bunch of jews like oppenheimer were truthful and credible for the entire storyline to be believable.
Let's assume a small group of jews was lying about their invention. Just for a moment. Now, ask yourself, in this moment, do we believe they were the only group of people with the technology and were smart enough to build two bombs to drop on Japan and somehow no one has ever figured it out since?
Add to that the fakery in the nuclear test videos. The Chinese ones are the most telling as they have guys on horses with gas masks riding towards the explosions with fire trucks and fire hoses. Some nuclear test videos are obvious fakery.
And, do you know who was in charge of curating that footage for the Americans? The same person who curated the JFK assassination videos. I'd be curious of his involvement in the moon landing videos, as well.
(tl;dr Neutron radiography equipment of today is far superior than what Oppenheimer had and anyone with a brain could fire it at a plutonium core. Why haven't they? Are you telling me North Korea hasn't tried this?)
You demonstrate how few have actually read the court files.
1) Giuffre's court pleading not only discussed girls as young as 8, she included a picture from Epsteins house of a nude 9 yo girl inline in the pleading so nobody could ignore it. Yet everyone seems to know nothing of this.
2) Maxwell was extorting and intimidating people for control of their babies; newborn infants.
So... I don't blame you, but I use you as an example of someone who is on a non normie layer of the Internet and still doesn't know this.
MeyerLansky 0 points 5 days ago
Adam Schiff, Ed Buck and Lindsay Graham all into the same dirty shyte.
/v/news viewpost?postid=6845cb35ce854
MeyerLansky 2 points 5 days ago
You are such a retarded spic.
Currently, the best publicly available data indicates that about 17% of active-duty U.S. Marines identify as Hispanic or Latino.
Delete your account, for the love of God.
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=684775ee6d086
MeyerLansky 2 points 5 days ago
He's a spic, of course he's going to reply like that.
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=684775ee6d086
MeyerLansky 8 points 5 days ago
It is a limited hangout in that they did much worse experiments than this and came up with similar results that are more horrifying.
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=684775ee6d086
MeyerLansky 1 point 5 days ago
Given that you're a spic, I see why you're desperate to make this completely irrelevant point.
The butthurt tears of @HeyJames is noted.
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=684775ee6d086
MeyerLansky 0 points 6 days ago
Separating? Don't you mean sufficiently bombarding with sustained neutron flux? I'm not sure you really know what you're talking about, based on that. Which begs the question as to why you're so concerned arguing about it.
What does stuxnet have to do with it? Nothing, other than Iran had breeder reactors that seemingly worked.
The Manhattan Project had a small group of people who weren't compartmentalized pieces. Less than a thousand, maybe even about 100. Everyone else involved had no idea of the big picture, even if some of them were informed of the main goal.
This means, the leader of the small core group had to be trusted to disseminate what and to whom and he was... jewish.
When the test finally came, they set up two groups to test against the bomb. One group was told they were to set up TNT to see if it matched the size of the bomb being set off. Then, the other group was told the same thing and now both groups are convinced they witnessed a nuclear explosion.
You got anything else? I've been over this.
/v/videos viewpost?postid=68433be2db69b
MeyerLansky 0 points 1 week ago
Your lack of self awareness doesn't surprise me.
/v/news viewpost?postid=6844f4e7c2b0c
MeyerLansky 1 point 1 week ago
Actually, it's disgusting. You're disgusting and so is Andrew Tate.
The real question is which of you is more disgusting?
/v/news viewpost?postid=6844f4e7c2b0c
MeyerLansky 0 points 1 week ago
Again, why are a small group of jews in the 40s able to do it but not thousands of scientists in North Korea, Iran, etc, not able to accomplish it?
/v/videos viewpost?postid=68433be2db69b
MeyerLansky 0 points 1 week ago
How many people have the roos killed... collectively?
Does Australia need to wipe them out like the emu? Apparently they were also a super deadly threat.
/v/Australia viewpost?postid=68451e6f5e06a
MeyerLansky 0 points 1 week ago
We wuz Kangaz
/v/Australia viewpost?postid=68451e6f5e06a
MeyerLansky 1 point 1 week ago
He's trying his best. It'd help if you put on some make up, once in a while.
/v/ShitpostLitterBox viewpost?postid=6844fdf464c32
MeyerLansky 0 points 1 week ago
This does not read like @AOU's writing.
This reads like @Crensch and Putt basically calls him out.
Who else was taking over subs and using "ProtectVoat" while having their bitch send tit pics?
@Crensch was trying to control how censorship worked on Voat and this was putt calling him out.
@HeyJames votes exactly like this motherfucker, too, and, of course, @HeyJames the dirty spic is in this thread pretending like this shit wasn't from him.
/v/Poal viewpost?postid=66f2ecf77cf5a
MeyerLansky 8 points 1 week ago
CIA
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=6844dd7566c30
MeyerLansky 4 points 1 week ago
He is the most closeted homosexual I have ever heard of and people need to stop giving him air time or a second thought.
However, my reason for commenting is that I think @Sal_180 and Andrew Tate would make the perfect gay couple. You should reach out.
/v/news viewpost?postid=6844f4e7c2b0c
MeyerLansky 0 points 1 week ago
And any other large, expensive pieces of machinery.
Aircraft carriers? Jets? Also becoming pointless.
With preplanned routes, air gapped, shielded drones, that cost less than $1,000 can be used to sink virtually any ship.
Remote controlled machines are becoming a favorite of Mossad. Troops also going to be irrelevant.
The real battlefield is the Internet and AI has already put itself in a position to strike first at everything.
The question ultimately boils down to what a network of AI brains will decide is moral, fair or if morality and fairness won't play any role, at all, and we grow straight to Morlock and Eloi.
/v/Military viewpost?postid=6844d7276f532
MeyerLansky 0 points 1 week ago
Google also leaves out the Hunter Biden fuckery. It's called a "limited hangout" where a limited amount of information is shown to prove wrong doing but the worst of it is hidden.
/v/PoliticalMemes viewpost?postid=68435d362f15a
MeyerLansky 0 points 1 week ago
I'll reiterate: Neutron radiography equipment of today is far superior than what Oppenheimer had and anyone with a brain could fire it at a plutonium core. Why haven't they? Are you telling me North Korea hasn't tried this?
/v/videos viewpost?postid=68433be2db69b
MeyerLansky 1 point 1 week ago
But, they appreciate having allies like you. They told me to remind you to put the post it back on your webcam. It fell off again.
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=6842a3fde5f9c
MeyerLansky 0 points 1 week ago*
I understand very well. Uranium itself doesn't "explode" or "melt down" simply because it decays quickly. If uranium decayed extremely quickly (unnaturally so), it could produce more heat, possibly leading to overheating if confined (but not an explosion). Meltdowns (e.g., Fukushima) are caused by decay heat from fission products (not uranium itself). Explosions in reactors (e.g., Chernobyl) are from steam/hydrogen buildup or prompt criticality—not uranium decay.
So, what I hear out of you is that you didn't pass high school physics. Noted.
At this moment, uranium pellets coated in ceramics and graphite can maintain heat and, even with meltdown, are contained and safe. The outer casing is designed to block the dangerous radiation. This has been in existence for at least 20+ years. There is no reason these small power plants powered with these pellets can't be all over the place.
I invite you to go to Hiroshima and look at Ground Zero. There is a building there... still standing, which means we have conventional weapons that are stronger. But, even worse, there is no directional wave form the epicenter, indicating Hiroshima was firebombed along with the 375 other locations in Japan we firebombed in the same year.
Reaching super criticality is purportedly achieved by firing neutron bullets at the center of plutonium or enriched uranium. But, we can fire at gold for back scattering experiments and this apparatus is easily obtainable by anyone who potentially wants a nuclear weapon.
Just like we STILL can't go back to the moon, with more technology and knowledge, state actors are STILL not capable of building nuclear weapons on their own.
Plus, you have to trust a bunch of jews like oppenheimer were truthful and credible for the entire storyline to be believable.
Let's assume a small group of jews was lying about their invention. Just for a moment. Now, ask yourself, in this moment, do we believe they were the only group of people with the technology and were smart enough to build two bombs to drop on Japan and somehow no one has ever figured it out since?
Add to that the fakery in the nuclear test videos. The Chinese ones are the most telling as they have guys on horses with gas masks riding towards the explosions with fire trucks and fire hoses. Some nuclear test videos are obvious fakery.
And, do you know who was in charge of curating that footage for the Americans? The same person who curated the JFK assassination videos. I'd be curious of his involvement in the moon landing videos, as well.
(tl;dr Neutron radiography equipment of today is far superior than what Oppenheimer had and anyone with a brain could fire it at a plutonium core. Why haven't they? Are you telling me North Korea hasn't tried this?)
/v/videos viewpost?postid=68433be2db69b
MeyerLansky 5 points 1 week ago
You demonstrate how few have actually read the court files.
1) Giuffre's court pleading not only discussed girls as young as 8, she included a picture from Epsteins house of a nude 9 yo girl inline in the pleading so nobody could ignore it. Yet everyone seems to know nothing of this.
2) Maxwell was extorting and intimidating people for control of their babies; newborn infants.
So... I don't blame you, but I use you as an example of someone who is on a non normie layer of the Internet and still doesn't know this.
/v/PoliticalMemes viewpost?postid=68435d362f15a
MeyerLansky 1 point 1 week ago
Nukes are fake and gay. Uranium is dangerous because individuals can build their own power plants and usurp the energy cartel.
/v/videos viewpost?postid=68433be2db69b
MeyerLansky 2 points 1 week ago
NSA brokering your data through 5 Eyes alliance that is really more like 5 Trillion Eyes.
/v/technology viewpost?postid=684368441535d
MeyerLansky 4 points 1 week ago
Isn't @HeyJames just your alt account?
/v/OccidentalEnclave viewpost?postid=684361857c41a
MeyerLansky 1 point 1 week ago
Japanese toilets implement technology superior to what the US had in the 1960s.
You mean to tell me we STILL can't get back to the moon?
/v/technology viewpost?postid=6842f0a70b8bf