Stop posting this AI fiction. It's not true. It may be based on truth, but these stories are written by AI and "read" by AI. Nothing about this is real. People are having a hard enough time recognizing what's AI generated, and you're part of the problem.
Nothing is going to change as a result of this knowledge. No laws will be repealed or found to be unlawful. It will be business as usual. Because jews.
That didn't happen. A jew who works for Trump had an contentious but staged argument with a CNN employee. This kind of shit is planned ahead in advance and nothing is spontaneous.
I would bet dollars to donuts that it's a vax injury. I know people who took the vax who later got cellulitis. Her problem is probably something related to having taken the vax.
Meh. The screenplay was written by a jew, William Goldman. And it has the sappiest, stupidest song ever written shoehorned in the middle. I remember when the movie came out, every AM radio station played that fucking song. I hated it then and I still hate it now.
I stopped watching when Icke identified Savile as part of some family, but the sound was blanked out. Why was that? I thought they were supposed to be telling some kind of Deep Truth, but they're self-censoring. Sorry, I don't have have time for weak-kneed shit like this.
It's a model created by a jew, nothing more. Facets of human personality have been identified and named for hundreds of years, each with their biases of their creators and their society's biases.
I actually have a source that addresses this in a comprehensive way. "When in the Course of Human Events: Arguing the Case for Southern Secession" by Charles Adams. A review on Amazon, copied from Booklist by Mary Carroll reads:
>In case anyone doubted Garry Wills' argument in A Necessary Evil that the peculiar myths and distortions surrounding the nature, formation, and meaning of the U.S. regularly stir movements committed to myth rather than reality, Adams, a historian of taxation, delivers a polemic that proves it. **The Civil War, Adams argues, was not about slavery or the Union; it was about tariffs! The Southern states had a right to secede.** Slavery would have ended at some point, but Lincoln did not particularly threaten it. It was, Adams maintains, the "dueling tariffs" of the Union and the Confederacy that caused the war. Within his states' rights argument, Adams maintains secession's legality should have been determined by the courts, and slaveholders should have been compensated for the property they lost through emancipation. Adams relies heavily on the European press; he asserts, but does not prove, that U.S. abolitionists were a fanatical lunatic fringe. The author clearly anticipates controversy; it should not be long in coming.
[italics and emphasis mine]
This book is nearly 300 pages, but a good part of that is references and sources. Overall it's an easy read. 10/10, strongly recommended.
The authority the North wanted over the South was the power to extract income through the agricultural tariff. Lincoln was clear when he ordered the invasion of South Carolina that all they had to do was submit to the tariff and he would recall the troops. He also said as much in his 1861 Inaugural Address.
Look at the faggot at the end acting as an apologist for homelessness and crime. He'd rather see bums hanging out around functioning businesses harassing people than crime-free areas. I would like to see a mob of homeless schizos attack and kill him. Everyone would win.
I'm talking about the person on historyreviewed.com who wrote the article. What's his name?
Edit: The video of Taylor actually saying so is pretty convincing. That's a shame. I like his books about White identity. It's sad to know he's controlled opposition, but then, I guess they all are.
Lost_In_The_Thinking 1 point 2 weeks ago
> Sometimes the comedy writes itself.
*writes isse'f.
/v/funny viewpost?postid=683b211edddce
Lost_In_The_Thinking 1 point 2 weeks ago
Get back to me when something actually happens, and I'll retract what I said. Until then, I stand by my prediction.
/v/USPolitics viewpost?postid=683ad17cd9999
Lost_In_The_Thinking 1 point 2 weeks ago
That doesn't make it worth viewing, or even posting here. It's garbage, a distraction, and a waste of everyone's time however you look at it.
/v/Women viewpost?postid=683a8d465d710
Lost_In_The_Thinking 0 points 2 weeks ago
Stop posting this AI fiction. It's not true. It may be based on truth, but these stories are written by AI and "read" by AI. Nothing about this is real. People are having a hard enough time recognizing what's AI generated, and you're part of the problem.
/v/Women viewpost?postid=683a8d465d710
Lost_In_The_Thinking 5 points 2 weeks ago
Nothing is going to change as a result of this knowledge. No laws will be repealed or found to be unlawful. It will be business as usual. Because jews.
/v/USPolitics viewpost?postid=683ad17cd9999
Lost_In_The_Thinking 1 point 2 weeks ago
Not from misconduct.
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=683a4ad0c5005
Lost_In_The_Thinking 2 points 2 weeks ago
Your link is utter shit.
>CNN Reporter Burst into Tears
That didn't happen. A jew who works for Trump had an contentious but staged argument with a CNN employee. This kind of shit is planned ahead in advance and nothing is spontaneous.
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=683a8c167fc90
Lost_In_The_Thinking 7 points 2 weeks ago*
I would bet dollars to donuts that it's a vax injury. I know people who took the vax who later got cellulitis. Her problem is probably something related to having taken the vax.
/v/news viewpost?postid=683a37e07b3ff
Lost_In_The_Thinking 1 point 2 weeks ago
Meh. The screenplay was written by a jew, William Goldman. And it has the sappiest, stupidest song ever written shoehorned in the middle. I remember when the movie came out, every AM radio station played that fucking song. I hated it then and I still hate it now.
/v/movies viewpost?postid=683978295460c
Lost_In_The_Thinking 0 points 3 weeks ago
I stopped watching when Icke identified Savile as part of some family, but the sound was blanked out. Why was that? I thought they were supposed to be telling some kind of Deep Truth, but they're self-censoring. Sorry, I don't have have time for weak-kneed shit like this.
/v/conspiracy viewpost?postid=68383c424581e
Lost_In_The_Thinking 0 points 3 weeks ago
It's a model created by a jew, nothing more. Facets of human personality have been identified and named for hundreds of years, each with their biases of their creators and their society's biases.
/v/Philosophy viewpost?postid=68385594053e1
Lost_In_The_Thinking 1 point 3 weeks ago
Right. jew acts like a jew. That's not news.
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=68311abc68bf9
Lost_In_The_Thinking 1 point 3 weeks ago
There were probably the same women standing with banners welcoming the "refugees".
/v/WorldNews viewpost?postid=683181ee3d81b
Lost_In_The_Thinking 0 points 3 weeks ago
Reverse parking? Are you one of those guys who backs into parking spaces? That's so fucking retarded.
/v/Niggerz viewpost?postid=682f94618fbcf
Lost_In_The_Thinking 0 points 4 weeks ago
You posted this just to show us your waifu pillow. You are degenerate.
/v/books viewpost?postid=682db7584ba7e
Lost_In_The_Thinking 0 points 4 weeks ago
I actually have a source that addresses this in a comprehensive way. "When in the Course of Human Events: Arguing the Case for Southern Secession" by Charles Adams. A review on Amazon, copied from Booklist by Mary Carroll reads:
>In case anyone doubted Garry Wills' argument in A Necessary Evil that the peculiar myths and distortions surrounding the nature, formation, and meaning of the U.S. regularly stir movements committed to myth rather than reality, Adams, a historian of taxation, delivers a polemic that proves it. **The Civil War, Adams argues, was not about slavery or the Union; it was about tariffs! The Southern states had a right to secede.** Slavery would have ended at some point, but Lincoln did not particularly threaten it. It was, Adams maintains, the "dueling tariffs" of the Union and the Confederacy that caused the war. Within his states' rights argument, Adams maintains secession's legality should have been determined by the courts, and slaveholders should have been compensated for the property they lost through emancipation. Adams relies heavily on the European press; he asserts, but does not prove, that U.S. abolitionists were a fanatical lunatic fringe. The author clearly anticipates controversy; it should not be long in coming.
[italics and emphasis mine]
This book is nearly 300 pages, but a good part of that is references and sources. Overall it's an easy read. 10/10, strongly recommended.
/v/AskUpgoat viewpost?postid=682e16bc9cf3e
Lost_In_The_Thinking 0 points 4 weeks ago
The authority the North wanted over the South was the power to extract income through the agricultural tariff. Lincoln was clear when he ordered the invasion of South Carolina that all they had to do was submit to the tariff and he would recall the troops. He also said as much in his 1861 Inaugural Address.
/v/AskUpgoat viewpost?postid=682e16bc9cf3e
Lost_In_The_Thinking 1 point 4 weeks ago*
Look at the faggot at the end acting as an apologist for homelessness and crime. He'd rather see bums hanging out around functioning businesses harassing people than crime-free areas. I would like to see a mob of homeless schizos attack and kill him. Everyone would win.
/v/funny viewpost?postid=682e2f29c14f3
Lost_In_The_Thinking 1 point 4 weeks ago
Or the Banana Phone Song.
/v/funny viewpost?postid=682e2f29c14f3
Lost_In_The_Thinking 0 points 4 weeks ago
I remember when the left used to bray about Trump wearing a rug.
/v/JewMedia viewpost?postid=682ec50ff0c33
Lost_In_The_Thinking -1 points 1 month ago
Just tell us what it is. No one wants to watch your fucking video.
/v/TraditionalLatinMass viewpost?postid=682bfa661a8f0
Lost_In_The_Thinking 0 points 1 month ago
It's a joke. Nothing about that was true.
/v/clusterBbitches viewpost?postid=682bd757ba4d2
Lost_In_The_Thinking 0 points 1 month ago
Could happen. Not will happen. This is just fear porn.
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=682b8931041c3
Lost_In_The_Thinking 0 points 1 month ago*
I'm talking about the person on historyreviewed.com who wrote the article. What's his name?
Edit: The video of Taylor actually saying so is pretty convincing. That's a shame. I like his books about White identity. It's sad to know he's controlled opposition, but then, I guess they all are.
/v/WhiteNationalism viewpost?postid=682ae6acc96c8
Lost_In_The_Thinking 1 point 1 month ago
This is already well known amongst OK bomber researchers.
/v/conspiracy viewpost?postid=682ae2c9cf331