> None of us should want a unipolar world run by Israel via the United States or anybody else. If that ever exists they will throw us all in gulags or kill us all by the tens of millions just like they did when they controlled Russia. Remember the Jews have said that is their plan.
It'd result in immediate civil war, revolution, or war of independence.
"Trump is a nazi! You like trump because you're right wing and conservative and white! You're a nazi!"
Is just a gimmick to get people back onto the trump-train funny farm.
The ol "get them arguing so they never notice the guy who told them to fight."
OP is likely an israeli shitposter part of the left-calls-trump-things-he-isn't-and-attacks-rightwingers-to-push-them-into-support-of-israeli-controlled-candidates.
The same tactics have stopped working because you don't innovate in your propaganda. Hire less cumguzzling freon-huffing retards at your propaganda outfit.
Those who don't defend themselves while under attack fade away.
All that will remain is a hardened core of fanatical zealots when the trash, refuse, and fair-weather whites are dead to the attacks by the imports, tribe members, and gender communists.
> You don’t glow because you’re a schizoid retard.
by implication that means you do glow.
"schizoid retard"
mind reading bullshit. You still glow like a nigger.
We're not buying the britfag "be afraid of muh nuclear holocaust so your nations refuse to go to war against communists while we slowly subvert you to death" bullshit insanity anymore.
Thats the point. Anyone can make up any old bullshit that if a crowd isn't paying attention, will be accepted out of hand.
It's why shit I wrote on twitter was being repeated by presidents. Their speech writers were doing the laziest thing possible on a regular basis: playing madlibs with their twitter followers, both on the left and the right, and the most widely accepted or memeable bullshit is what got through.
99% of stupid people think they're not gullible, and there are no big lies. But they are, and there are.
> If you say voting doesn't matter, you are correct. But if you then say violence is any alternative, you are wrong. The real alternative, the one which in fact leads to power, is controlling public opinion with counter-propaganda.
If two groups hate each other, you can't stop them forever from fighting. Two drunks in a bar will fight. Two dogs will fight. Two nations will fight. Makes no difference.
Worse, the will to fight is a fundemental component of human nature, perhaps even a deep seated need.
Some groups destroy their opposition. Some groups reconcile only after the fighting.
And as a rule, the longer a fight is held off, the deeper, and more bitter the animosity, and the greater the destruction that follows.
It is therefore, all things under consideration, after its own manner, a great historical injustice, both on the individual level, and even the national level, to make from old animosities the perversion of artificial peace for mere peace's sake, rather than settling differences however circumstance dictates they need be settled.
And it is to the frusteration of human progress, and human nature, and more importantly, human self determination, that peace imposed either internally (and foolishly), or by external efforts, impinges so on the autonomy of individuals and nations alike.
Blood is the great arbiter, conflict the reconcilor and destroyer, the judge, the jury, and both the reward and punishment of all.
To do otherwise is to deny the very historical process that makes us human, gives us an anchor in time, and that which created civilization to begin with, without which there is no future history.
And at the end of history, when the great peace is achieved, will be the graveyard of man.
Died of boredom, and lack of necessity, and all those animating contests which had shaped him and his works.
Peace is the great usurper which like a thief of dreams, builds a prison around all who seek it, and substitutes freedom for weakness and complacency.
And all greatness that could have been, all horror, all wonder, is lulled therefore at once into both crib and convalescence.
Peace is the enemy of generations, both past, and present, and future.
> i remember he "predicted" a bunch of stuff years ago
Regular people are not beyond making good assessments of the future, but it helps when the person making a prediction is an insider. For the rest of us on the outside, it takes a lot of effort to work out the details of whats narrative, and whats truth.
U.s funded, israeli manufactured (companies owned by them through american proxies), british pushed, developed in china.
> Pearl Harbor
U.s. pushed for, and knew, carried out by Japan. Hiroshima and Nagasaki tacitly allowed by the emperor because the condition of surrender without morale-devastating attacks would have lead to the deposing of the imperial family (and likely death), and continued fighting (and death) of Japanese.
> Gulf of Tonkin
Done by the u.s.
> MLK
Soviet and israeli, with british help.
> Mandalay Bay shooting
U.s. intelligence, botched raid on saudi royals.
> JFK assassination
Too many enemies to list, anyone could have done it.
Good to keep findings in say a file for each, in a cabinet, in say, a storage unit, the same way intelligence agencies keep their assessments of events, or the way institutions of a regime make reports that orient a government on various facts and determinations, i.e. "institutional truth".
Because without "muh paperwork", what we consider truth is reduced to opinion, and opinion is too easily changeable with circumstance and propaganda.
> I'm guessing it's a government professional. We'll never know the truth.
Yup. I disagree on never knowing the truth though.
The truth movement got its very first start during the JFK assassination, went mainstream after 9/11, and has only gone to ground, embedded, grown, and hardened ever since.
Every secret the u.s. has kept sooner or later will come out, because all throughout history men have been willing to go to any end to know reality from fiction.
"Is it because of the holocaust you (Israel) should be allowed to have nuclear weapons?"
I think thats a fair question, that only someone who was arrogant would refuse to answer.
Any nation and their representative that was being intellectually honest, would be willing to answer such a question.
The fact that they weren't actually says TWO things:
1. israel does have a nuclear program
2. the holocaust is an excuse for such, and they know as much.
As far as excuses go, no sovereign nation needs any for what it decides to do internally. Each nation is free, or should be, to follow whatever policies its ruling regime sees best for their own interests.
On the otherhand, when you agree to an interview, *and then* refuse to deal honestly, thats on you.
And I'll explain why he didn't want to:
It's a have-your-cake-and-eat it moment.
Answering honestly presuposes a fairness doctrine, that if israel were allowed to have weapons, why shouldn't any other nation?
And second, to avoid that, the only out here is "yes, because the holocaust", which doesn't work because 1. it was more than half a century ago and its a distant abstraction now, not merely to new generations, but even to most living politicians and world leaders.
And 2. a card used too many times is a card overplayed and easily exhausted when most parties today, individually, have no culpability in the holocaust, feel like they owe nothing in any given negotiation because of this very lack of culpability, and are tired of heavy-handed negotiations and one-sided policies that end in the inexplicable and obviously absurd reason of "because the holocaust, thats why."
Like what does the fucking holocaust have to do with a yearly mega-ton turnip tarrif trade agreement between Indonesia and Israel? Absolutely fucking nothing to Indonesia.
And yet I guarantee you, at some time or another, there have been dozens or more likely several hundred agreements and negotiations and policy disputes between organizations and nations involved with israel, and when the chips were down, the final card was "agree with us because the holocaust."
They've tuned it out. And it becomes easier, year on year, for people to shut that down, at least in internal discussions, and say "look, every nation and group of people has experienced hard times. It doesn't give you or permit special privileges status due to victimhood."
And privately I'm sure theres been a lot of discussion in negotiations that amounts to "can you believe these people? And how many fucking Israelis on wallstreet and in london FINANCED hitler?"
It's like some kids dog dying, and two years later, dad's like "your dog died timmy, its time to fucking get over it, and mow the damn lawn instead of using it as an excuse to get out of chores."
Fundementally if Israel doesn't want to lose further legitimacy, it must grow into maturity, and do the hardwork of appearing respectable on the world stage, and dealing with its allies, let alone opposition, plainly.
"we have a nuclear program to protect ourselves. And obviously it is against our national interests that opposition nation's have their own, nations which have also expressed hostility to western nations like america and britain"
would have been a far more honest, and respectable answer, befitting a mature nation and its spokeperson, than shutting the conversation down like a teenager afraid to answer simple and direct questions.
Irrespective of what other people's opinions on Israel are, talking simple pragmatics, if Israel is going to last it has to grow up, and engage in discourse that makes sense.
You know who engaged in ultimatums, total war, and arrogance? Ghangis Khan. He was famous. He was a badass. He is remembered now, centuries out. Ghangis Khan died. His empire disintegrated, and was changed and absorbed beyond all recognition, as well as much of his culture.
Because while being the biggest badass on the block is cool an all, its teenage shit, and eventually beyond force, you have to project legitimacy if you don't want opponents to team up against you when they grow tired of the bravado.
Nations are young because they often don't last, like stars that flare up and burn out quickly from how hot they burn. And in the process of nation building, it is like old men in professions where men die young: They build quiet confidence, that inspires respect. They don't need to shut down interactions, because they have the answers, and strength to back it up.
This spokesman projects none of those qualities, and ill-serves his host nation because of it.
prototype 0 points 12 hours ago
> None of us should want a unipolar world run by Israel via the United States or anybody else. If that ever exists they will throw us all in gulags or kill us all by the tens of millions just like they did when they controlled Russia. Remember the Jews have said that is their plan.
It'd result in immediate civil war, revolution, or war of independence.
/v/Jews viewpost?postid=6851dd2e9149d
prototype 0 points 12 hours ago
> chyna beat this problem by building their q clusters in space now. No room temp superconducting is needed...
I hear space is a great place to keep computers that rely on dissipating as much heat as possible.
/v/technology viewpost?postid=6851fc89a4007
prototype 1 point 12 hours ago
> WAKE THE FUCK UP WE GOT TO SUPPORT ISRAEL AND DAVE THE WORLD FROM THESE CRAZY ISLAMISTS!!
Man unit 8200 is making really cool pro-iran propaganda.
Is this the new call of judy?
The new update for viya-gaym reality is looking spicy.
Who is Dave?
/v/Islam viewpost?postid=68520a86d104f
prototype 0 points 12 hours ago
> I’m saying the shit you post is too fucking stupid to be of any use to kikes and feds.
Sometimes I just post to piss you guys off.
/v/HebraicHijinksandSheenyShenanigans viewpost?postid=6850c305ef605
prototype 0 points 16 hours ago
"Trump is a nazi! You like trump because you're right wing and conservative and white! You're a nazi!"
Is just a gimmick to get people back onto the trump-train funny farm.
The ol "get them arguing so they never notice the guy who told them to fight."
OP is likely an israeli shitposter part of the left-calls-trump-things-he-isn't-and-attacks-rightwingers-to-push-them-into-support-of-israeli-controlled-candidates.
The same tactics have stopped working because you don't innovate in your propaganda. Hire less cumguzzling freon-huffing retards at your propaganda outfit.
Ignored.
/v/news viewpost?postid=68518dd58eff1
prototype 0 points 16 hours ago
> It's all about long and short distance automated destruction machines.
The writing was on the wall from the moment we saw the outcome of the war in nagorno karabakh.
/v/OccidentalEnclave viewpost?postid=6851b894de718
prototype 1 point 16 hours ago
"If the Strait of Hormuz got closed then our guys think oil would go to 120"
It'll go higher than that.
Wait till the whole gulf of oman closes.
/v/OccidentalEnclave viewpost?postid=6851bca21c0e0
prototype 1 point 17 hours ago
Eugenics in action.
Those who don't defend themselves while under attack fade away.
All that will remain is a hardened core of fanatical zealots when the trash, refuse, and fair-weather whites are dead to the attacks by the imports, tribe members, and gender communists.
/v/TellUpgoat viewpost?postid=6851c270b5430
prototype 1 point 17 hours ago
> You don’t glow because you’re a schizoid retard.
by implication that means you do glow.
"schizoid retard"
mind reading bullshit. You still glow like a nigger.
We're not buying the britfag "be afraid of muh nuclear holocaust so your nations refuse to go to war against communists while we slowly subvert you to death" bullshit insanity anymore.
/v/HebraicHijinksandSheenyShenanigans viewpost?postid=6850c305ef605
prototype 1 point 23 hours ago*
Thats the point. Anyone can make up any old bullshit that if a crowd isn't paying attention, will be accepted out of hand.
It's why shit I wrote on twitter was being repeated by presidents. Their speech writers were doing the laziest thing possible on a regular basis: playing madlibs with their twitter followers, both on the left and the right, and the most widely accepted or memeable bullshit is what got through.
99% of stupid people think they're not gullible, and there are no big lies. But they are, and there are.
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=6850e682ec395
prototype 2 points 1 day ago
> I hope Israel launches nukes so retards can claim they’re just thermobaric fuel-air bombs and claim the radiation is from something else.
"there is no such thing as salted conventional weapons or dirty bombs" says the nigger who glows in the dark.
/v/HebraicHijinksandSheenyShenanigans viewpost?postid=6850c305ef605
prototype 0 points 1 day ago
> Like Dr Who
I don't follow, explain.
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=6850e682ec395
prototype 0 points 1 day ago
> I disnt know about missing bombing squadrans
I invite you to dig into that one.
Memory eludes me, may have been a bigger action element than a squadron.
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=6850e682ec395
prototype 2 points 1 day ago
> If you say voting doesn't matter, you are correct. But if you then say violence is any alternative, you are wrong. The real alternative, the one which in fact leads to power, is controlling public opinion with counter-propaganda.
If no one else saw this post, at least I did.
/v/WhiteNationalism viewpost?postid=6850cd8fa95c2
prototype 0 points 3 days ago*
If two groups hate each other, you can't stop them forever from fighting. Two drunks in a bar will fight. Two dogs will fight. Two nations will fight. Makes no difference.
Worse, the will to fight is a fundemental component of human nature, perhaps even a deep seated need.
Some groups destroy their opposition. Some groups reconcile only after the fighting.
And as a rule, the longer a fight is held off, the deeper, and more bitter the animosity, and the greater the destruction that follows.
It is therefore, all things under consideration, after its own manner, a great historical injustice, both on the individual level, and even the national level, to make from old animosities the perversion of artificial peace for mere peace's sake, rather than settling differences however circumstance dictates they need be settled.
And it is to the frusteration of human progress, and human nature, and more importantly, human self determination, that peace imposed either internally (and foolishly), or by external efforts, impinges so on the autonomy of individuals and nations alike.
Blood is the great arbiter, conflict the reconcilor and destroyer, the judge, the jury, and both the reward and punishment of all.
To do otherwise is to deny the very historical process that makes us human, gives us an anchor in time, and that which created civilization to begin with, without which there is no future history.
And at the end of history, when the great peace is achieved, will be the graveyard of man.
Died of boredom, and lack of necessity, and all those animating contests which had shaped him and his works.
Peace is the great usurper which like a thief of dreams, builds a prison around all who seek it, and substitutes freedom for weakness and complacency.
And all greatness that could have been, all horror, all wonder, is lulled therefore at once into both crib and convalescence.
Peace is the enemy of generations, both past, and present, and future.
Peace is slavery.
/v/conspiracy viewpost?postid=684da950a70be
prototype 1 point 3 days ago
Shades of "Nothing is true. Everything is permitted."
/v/Trump viewpost?postid=684dd48b63dbf
prototype 0 points 3 days ago
> 'Mah holocaust' continues to be the golden key that unlocks the worlds coffers to the jews.
Thats why u.s. intelligence has tried for decades to impose the two state solution right?
Thats why the u.s. rushed immediately to send our entire military to drop our entire arsenal on iran right?
Thats why russia immediately bowed down to israelis to keel over and let ukraine bomb them right?
Thats why the chinese are allied with nations against the israelis right?
Right?
The holocaust is not as new or as shiny as it once was, you'd only be fooling yourself to believe otherwise.
/v/videos viewpost?postid=684d6b7bcbcbd
prototype 0 points 3 days ago
> i remember he "predicted" a bunch of stuff years ago
Regular people are not beyond making good assessments of the future, but it helps when the person making a prediction is an insider. For the rest of us on the outside, it takes a lot of effort to work out the details of whats narrative, and whats truth.
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=684dc0817ba13
prototype 0 points 3 days ago*
> Covid?
U.s funded, israeli manufactured (companies owned by them through american proxies), british pushed, developed in china.
> Pearl Harbor
U.s. pushed for, and knew, carried out by Japan. Hiroshima and Nagasaki tacitly allowed by the emperor because the condition of surrender without morale-devastating attacks would have lead to the deposing of the imperial family (and likely death), and continued fighting (and death) of Japanese.
> Gulf of Tonkin
Done by the u.s.
> MLK
Soviet and israeli, with british help.
> Mandalay Bay shooting
U.s. intelligence, botched raid on saudi royals.
> JFK assassination
Too many enemies to list, anyone could have done it.
Good to keep findings in say a file for each, in a cabinet, in say, a storage unit, the same way intelligence agencies keep their assessments of events, or the way institutions of a regime make reports that orient a government on various facts and determinations, i.e. "institutional truth".
Because without "muh paperwork", what we consider truth is reduced to opinion, and opinion is too easily changeable with circumstance and propaganda.
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=684db798c458b
prototype 0 points 3 days ago
The soft version of what I wrote is "take everything and everyone with a grain of salt, and hold em at arms length at all times."
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=684dc0817ba13
prototype 1 point 3 days ago
> I'm guessing it's a government professional. We'll never know the truth.
Yup. I disagree on never knowing the truth though.
The truth movement got its very first start during the JFK assassination, went mainstream after 9/11, and has only gone to ground, embedded, grown, and hardened ever since.
Every secret the u.s. has kept sooner or later will come out, because all throughout history men have been willing to go to any end to know reality from fiction.
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=684db798c458b
prototype 2 points 3 days ago
> can't be sure of anything
We can make reasonable, and informative guesses though.
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=684db798c458b
prototype 0 points 3 days ago
> The guy who keyed the car was correctly identified.
I seriously doubt it. The evidence says otherwise.
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=684db798c458b
prototype 0 points 3 days ago*
"Is it because of the holocaust you (Israel) should be allowed to have nuclear weapons?"
I think thats a fair question, that only someone who was arrogant would refuse to answer.
Any nation and their representative that was being intellectually honest, would be willing to answer such a question.
The fact that they weren't actually says TWO things:
1. israel does have a nuclear program
2. the holocaust is an excuse for such, and they know as much.
As far as excuses go, no sovereign nation needs any for what it decides to do internally. Each nation is free, or should be, to follow whatever policies its ruling regime sees best for their own interests.
On the otherhand, when you agree to an interview, *and then* refuse to deal honestly, thats on you.
And I'll explain why he didn't want to:
It's a have-your-cake-and-eat it moment.
Answering honestly presuposes a fairness doctrine, that if israel were allowed to have weapons, why shouldn't any other nation?
And second, to avoid that, the only out here is "yes, because the holocaust", which doesn't work because 1. it was more than half a century ago and its a distant abstraction now, not merely to new generations, but even to most living politicians and world leaders.
And 2. a card used too many times is a card overplayed and easily exhausted when most parties today, individually, have no culpability in the holocaust, feel like they owe nothing in any given negotiation because of this very lack of culpability, and are tired of heavy-handed negotiations and one-sided policies that end in the inexplicable and obviously absurd reason of "because the holocaust, thats why."
Like what does the fucking holocaust have to do with a yearly mega-ton turnip tarrif trade agreement between Indonesia and Israel? Absolutely fucking nothing to Indonesia.
And yet I guarantee you, at some time or another, there have been dozens or more likely several hundred agreements and negotiations and policy disputes between organizations and nations involved with israel, and when the chips were down, the final card was "agree with us because the holocaust."
They've tuned it out. And it becomes easier, year on year, for people to shut that down, at least in internal discussions, and say "look, every nation and group of people has experienced hard times. It doesn't give you or permit special privileges status due to victimhood."
And privately I'm sure theres been a lot of discussion in negotiations that amounts to "can you believe these people? And how many fucking Israelis on wallstreet and in london FINANCED hitler?"
It's like some kids dog dying, and two years later, dad's like "your dog died timmy, its time to fucking get over it, and mow the damn lawn instead of using it as an excuse to get out of chores."
Fundementally if Israel doesn't want to lose further legitimacy, it must grow into maturity, and do the hardwork of appearing respectable on the world stage, and dealing with its allies, let alone opposition, plainly.
"we have a nuclear program to protect ourselves. And obviously it is against our national interests that opposition nation's have their own, nations which have also expressed hostility to western nations like america and britain"
would have been a far more honest, and respectable answer, befitting a mature nation and its spokeperson, than shutting the conversation down like a teenager afraid to answer simple and direct questions.
Irrespective of what other people's opinions on Israel are, talking simple pragmatics, if Israel is going to last it has to grow up, and engage in discourse that makes sense.
You know who engaged in ultimatums, total war, and arrogance? Ghangis Khan. He was famous. He was a badass. He is remembered now, centuries out. Ghangis Khan died. His empire disintegrated, and was changed and absorbed beyond all recognition, as well as much of his culture.
Because while being the biggest badass on the block is cool an all, its teenage shit, and eventually beyond force, you have to project legitimacy if you don't want opponents to team up against you when they grow tired of the bravado.
Nations are young because they often don't last, like stars that flare up and burn out quickly from how hot they burn. And in the process of nation building, it is like old men in professions where men die young: They build quiet confidence, that inspires respect. They don't need to shut down interactions, because they have the answers, and strength to back it up.
This spokesman projects none of those qualities, and ill-serves his host nation because of it.
/v/videos viewpost?postid=684d6b7bcbcbd
prototype 1 point 3 days ago
Stare contra omne malum.
/v/funny viewpost?postid=684d982f9698d