top:
day week month all

law

Community for : 8 months

A forum for discussions on law and how to change laws to benefit White people.

Owner: oppressed

Mods:
oppressed












1
Anti-Christian and Anti-American     (voxday.net)
submitted by carnold03 to law 1 week ago (+3/-2)
5 comments last comment...
https://voxday.net/2024/05/03/anti-christian-and-anti-american/

#Anti-Christian and Anti-American

The corrupt creatures in Congress are making your choice very clear and unmistakable. Jesus Christ and the First Amendment or Holocaustianity and Hate Speech Laws.

The United States House of Representatives has passed H.R. 6090, a bill that criminalizes basic Biblical Truth. This alarming legislation seeks to weaponize the Civil Rights Act for the enforcement of federal anti-discrimination laws, thus having a chilling effect on the free speech of Christians across the nation.

The bill adopts the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance’s definition of “antisemitism” which includes the basic Biblical Truth that the Jews killed Jesus Christ as “classic antisemitism.” The bill has raised serious concerns among Christians who believe that their First Amendment rights are being threatened. For example H.R. 6090 could potentially make it a crime for pastors to preach sermons that adhere to Biblical passages, of which there are many, which explicitly state that the Jews killed Jesus.

As a result, churches may become targets for Civil Rights Act discrimination lawsuits, leading to a wave of anti-Christian sentiment and the stifling of religious expression. This legislation follows just a few weeks after we learned, during Holy Week of all times, that saying “Christ is King” is “antisemitic” from many of the gatekeeping establishment voices on the right. It also follows a slew of similar “hate speech” legislation at the state level that is being passed by Republican governors in red states, including Ron DeSantis who flew to Israel to sign his….

Unfortunately, many pastors have chosen to ignore the implications of bills like H.R. 6090, allowing the bill to pass without raising their voices in opposition. This silence is not only a disservice to their congregations and the Church itself, but also a missed opportunity to defend the Biblical truths that have guided Christians for centuries. Even worse are the pastors who are supporting legislation like this because of their twisted and heretical theology that makes an idol out of the modern antichrist nation state of Israel and the antichrist Jews.

The Devil certainly knows his own. Those who choose to believe the lies will suffer the consequences, even as they stupidly and smugly believe that they are being blessed for “blessing Israel” by participating in the attempted murder of America/Amalek. You would think that when resisting satanry is criminalized and denounced as “anti-semitic”, they would be able to put two and two together to make four.

I say “attempted murder” because I am entirely certain that they will fail. They always do. And they always will.
1
Call Top Dog     (law)
submitted by GrayDragon to law 3 weeks ago (+1/-0)
1 comments last comment...
Stupid story. I was looking out the window and saw a public transportation bus in my niggerville. An advertisement covering the entire bus on the side that I could see had a seemingly White guy smiling with the text , "Injured? Medical malpractice? CALL TOP DOG." The "Top Dog" in niggerville made me laugh and sigh. Then I noticed there was no phone number?!?

Then again, a simple search yields: https://topdoglaw.com/personal-injury-lawyer/pennsylvania/philadelphia/
1
if we wanted to file a lawsuit against the federal government to end forced racial integration/white genocide, what kind of person or party would our lawyer need to represent?     (law)
submitted by oppressed to law 3 months ago (+2/-1)
1 comments last comment...
do we need some person or group saying forced racial integration effects them immensely negatively? and therefore the government must end the practice of force-integrating those people by law? or the laws causing forced integration must be overturned?

can you folks pontificate on this?

some facts that legally prove forced racial integration is harmful to whites are,


A Black is 35 times more likely to attack a White than the other way around.

Video evidence: https://www.bitchute.com/video/tD9C72AIpnnj/


and Despite being 5% of the population, young Black males commit 53% of all murders, 54% of all robbery.

Source: https://tinyurl.com/67tmj4zc


3
Howie Carr: ‘This is Your (Corrupt, Lying, cheating, thieving, dishonest, incompetent) FBI,’ thanks to DEI     (archive.ph)
submitted by beece to law 3 months ago (+3/-0)
1 comments last comment...
2
Part of a racketeering scam.     (www.minds.com)
submitted by we_kill_creativity to law 3 months ago (+2/-0)
2 comments last comment...
24
the only statistic you might need to end forced racial integration is that blacks are 35 times more likely to attack whites than the other way around. what would a court say?     (law)
submitted by oppressed to law 5 months ago (+25/-1)
10 comments last comment...
if you sued the government to end forced racial integration based on the statistic, what would a court say? wouldn't it be enough to prove black integration is deadly for whites?

If Blacks are 35 times more likely to attack Whites than the other way around*, it proves the liberal belief in racial equality is harmful. It proves JFK and MLK jr should have been more responsible about the disparate devastation that Black genes can cause.

Blacks 35 times more likely to attack whites than the other way around, proof "racism" against blacks saves lives.

Graph: https://i.redd.it/vsyli1xsic151.jpg

Video evidence: https://odysee.com/@AmericanRenaissance:7/NCVS_720:c?r=AFStfsgbxwc769A8mJDiRSfroeRTpdMU

21
Internet Censorship of White Nationalism is a sort of discrimination based on political views. Shouldn't that be as illegal as discrimination based on race and gender?     (law)
submitted by oppressed to law 6 months ago (+21/-0)
11 comments last comment...
Why isn't it illegal under anti-discrimination laws? Can we file lawsuits to stop censorship over political views? Can congress pass bills to stop internet from censoring?
6
But a Rapist or a Child Molester Can Get Out In Like 3 or 4 Years     (nypost.com)
submitted by TheBigGuyFromQueens to law 8 months ago (+6/-0)
4 comments last comment...
-3
A Lawsuit that could change the world, Sue the Federal government to end White Genocide     (law)
submitted by oppressed to law 8 months ago (+1/-4)
7 comments last comment...
White Nationalism has all the facts on its side to prove diversity is very harmful to Whites.

Therefore I think we could convince one White Federal Judge to agree forced integration is illegal/unconstitutional/harmful/genocidal/etc. - to White people. And therefore, that forced integration and anti-discrimination laws must be adjusted or overturned.

My biggest idea to save Whites yet, a Federal lawsuit to end forced racial integration/White Genocide for those who want it, and on these grounds:

1) Diversity destroys the host race, Whites, through a process known as genetic swamping/White Genocide.

"Naturalists want to keep the two types of crocodile apart so as to avoid genetic swamping.

But White people, if you care about their survival, you're a 'Nazi.'"

Jared Taylor explains this in DO WHITE PEOPLE HAVE A FUTURE:

https://www.bitchute.com/video/rNH5cX7khrQ1/

2) Diversity causes unmitigated violence against White people, since Blacks 35 times more likely to commit violence against whites.

Video proof: https://odysee.com/@AmericanRenaissance:7/NCVS_720:c?r=AFStfsgbxwc769A8mJDiRSfroeRTpdMU

Graph: https://i.redd.it/vsyli1xsic151.jpg

Does that prove so-called "racism" could save lives? It proves anti-discrimination laws are unjust and harmful.

3) Diversity changes the culture, media, and government into a mish-mash of alien races and thoughts which are often harmful to the host race, Whites.

4) With diversity and colorblind anti-racism, Whites get wrongfully blamed and victimized for any disparate outcomes between races.

Examples of victimization Whites go through:

Contant Media harassment of pro-Whites, race realists, White Nationalists, Nick Fuentes, etc. That is in stark contrast to the media's constant promotion and high appraisals of non-White leaders and anti-White ideas.

5) Diversity causes limitless destruction of property through violent negro riots. If Whites combat such riots they are hated as "racist White Supremacist bigot nazis." (List a history of property damage from negro riots here.)

6) Diversity causes a crisis of poverty and unemployment through a dysgentic multiracial shared destiny. The world needs lots of pure and healthy White DNA to produce its bountiful breadbaskets for Africans and others.

7) Now you folks can add more

If diversity causes this much harm, violence, and difficulties for White people, then it's illegal/unconstitutional/harmful/genocidal/etc. to White people. That's the bottom line.

Forced integration must therefore be overturned, and with lower courts on up to the Supreme Court if necessary.

Hit like if you're with me.

We have many hours of race realist video content to show Federal Judges, from Rushton, Jared Taylor, and many others. Federal Judges must Watch Basic Facts About Race in 13 Minutes:

https://odysee.com/@AmericanRenaissance:7/Basic-Facts-About-Race:7
6
Unelected judges have too much power, Sir Jacob Rees-Mogg warns as he claims the sovereignty of Parliament has been 'eroded' in recent years by an 'activist judiciary'     (www.msn.com)
submitted by paul_neri to law 3 months ago (+6/-0)
0 comments...
2
Don't be a Retard Like Jike     (www.youtube.com)
submitted by beece to law 1 month ago (+2/-0)
0 comments...