This is a thought experiment from a video on old Voat, designed to awaken Whites.
First, you ask the person you are trying to awaken:
Should there be a country, somewhere in the world, where White people maintain a majority of the population?
It is intentionally vague, as normies will get uncomfortable at the implication if you specify a country. So just somewhere in the world, an undefined piece of the Earth.
If they answer yes, they have at least a trace of racial consciousness and you can probably further redpill them over time.
If they answer no, they are anti-White. If they are
unaware that they are being anti-White, you can explain that every group deserves their own country, so why single out Whites as exempt from that when it would lead to a destruction of their culture. You can make comparisons to other groups, such as:
"What if Hispanic people weren't allowed to have their own countries, wouldn't that destroy them as a people?"
The point is to force normies to acknowledge the disparity that Whites are not allowed to have even one country in which they can maintain a majority. Some will simply be anti-White and see no issue with that, but this thought experiment separates the ones fully gone from the ones that could be awakened.
15MAR 1 points 5 months ago
You believe it's impossible to have a belief that ideologically disagrees partially with the rules of the society in which you live, and yet make your behavior align with those rules? We do it all the time, we hate this society yet go to work each day and uphold it.
In a reverse of that dynamic, I think Christians living in let's say a secular White Ethno-State would have much less of a reason to hate that society than we do ours. If they'd even have any reason to actually hate it. In regards to day-to-day behavior they'd have to comply with, they shouldn't have many disagreements.
If any act against the Ethno-State, they're done. But if they don't?
I suppose what we're really debating is: should they be given a chance, given the parameters in place?