His religion doesn't eat pork, but the majority religion of this country does, when he's pissing on the pig, he's pissing on the people who would eat them.
In the dark ages, it was considered that whatever someone had done with the food of their host was reflective of what they had thought about the host themselves.
Because if the guest wasn't eating the food, it would be assumed the food was to be eaten by the host, pissing on the food your host gave you is telling the host to eat your piss.
Also the dark ages considered it not an act of murder to kill someone for insulting you in such a way, we need to bring back that policy where killing can legally be excused by someone else having intentionally caused you offense.
AntiPostmodernist 13 points 4 months ago
His religion doesn't eat pork, but the majority religion of this country does, when he's pissing on the pig, he's pissing on the people who would eat them.
In the dark ages, it was considered that whatever someone had done with the food of their host was reflective of what they had thought about the host themselves.
Because if the guest wasn't eating the food, it would be assumed the food was to be eaten by the host, pissing on the food your host gave you is telling the host to eat your piss.
Also the dark ages considered it not an act of murder to kill someone for insulting you in such a way, we need to bring back that policy where killing can legally be excused by someone else having intentionally caused you offense.