enough people care that there are multiple articles
This is an appeal to popularity and is a logical fallicy. It's also not true since this is not a popular idea. My point wasn't about if anyone cares though, it was if the people he was posing the questions to cared or even knew thet he was directing his "challenge" to them. If I posed a public question to Donald Trump and he ignores it or doesn't hear about it, that doesn't lend me any credibility or make me right.
we need to focus on what is important
"We" = another group appeal implying there is a notable group that agrees with you. Not true and a false appeal to social proof.
very well credentialed in his field
Appeal to authority, another fallacy. Antony Fauci is also well credentialed in his field.
valid, serious questions
This hasn't been established, and nobody is taking 45 minutes to find out it's a clickbait waste of time.
In the future, if you want to have a real discussion about any theory, fringe or otherwise, just post the main points and whatever supports them without lengthy articles that are the equivalent of a wild goose chase and you'll at least get a discussion about those points.
SecretHitler 0 points 5 months ago
This is an appeal to popularity and is a logical fallicy. It's also not true since this is not a popular idea. My point wasn't about if anyone cares though, it was if the people he was posing the questions to cared or even knew thet he was directing his "challenge" to them. If I posed a public question to Donald Trump and he ignores it or doesn't hear about it, that doesn't lend me any credibility or make me right.
"We" = another group appeal implying there is a notable group that agrees with you. Not true and a false appeal to social proof.
Appeal to authority, another fallacy. Antony Fauci is also well credentialed in his field.
This hasn't been established, and nobody is taking 45 minutes to find out it's a clickbait waste of time.
In the future, if you want to have a real discussion about any theory, fringe or otherwise, just post the main points and whatever supports them without lengthy articles that are the equivalent of a wild goose chase and you'll at least get a discussion about those points.