a) only within reality (perceivable inspiration) can there be fiction (suggested information).
b) few suggest -isms to control consenting many with suggested. Consent permits exploitation.
c) consenting to suggested (fiction) tempts one to ignore perceivable (reality), hence viewing reality through a lens of suggested fiction shaped by others.
d) consenting to suggested permits others to define (idolatry); redefine (revisionism) and contradict (talmudic reasoning) information at will, while oneself keeps worshiping idols; adapting to constantly changing definitions, and fighting each other within conflicts of reason over the suggested.
ImplicationOverReason 0 points 7 months ago
a) only within reality (perceivable inspiration) can there be fiction (suggested information).
b) few suggest -isms to control consenting many with suggested. Consent permits exploitation.
c) consenting to suggested (fiction) tempts one to ignore perceivable (reality), hence viewing reality through a lens of suggested fiction shaped by others.
d) consenting to suggested permits others to define (idolatry); redefine (revisionism) and contradict (talmudic reasoning) information at will, while oneself keeps worshiping idols; adapting to constantly changing definitions, and fighting each other within conflicts of reason over the suggested.