Terrible grammar too. It's as if it wasn't edited: "In a lawsuit filed by the 19 partygoers after a year of the incident," A year AFTER the incident. The article is titled "Who is Marcus Rosebrook" - it's all about him, identifying / name and shame him. It's not directed at 'The Incident, it's 'Who is this guy'. I watched the little Inside Edition video too - they stress the "BLACK guests, and Marcus is WHIIIIIITE" Holy frig it doesn't even mention what TIME the incident happened. It quotes Marcus as saying "It went from 4 till 10pm and later, getting progressively louder". If he was spraying water at 2am its substantially different than 9pm - especially if there's a law broken and police aren't helping.
I don't know why we tolerate this news media. Years after they started their ridiculously dishonest anti-Trump vendetta, no one has burned them to the ground etc.
blit416 7 points 7 months ago
Terrible grammar too. It's as if it wasn't edited:
"In a lawsuit filed by the 19 partygoers after a year of the incident,"
A year AFTER the incident.
The article is titled "Who is Marcus Rosebrook" - it's all about him, identifying / name and shame him. It's not directed at 'The Incident, it's 'Who is this guy'.
I watched the little Inside Edition video too - they stress the "BLACK guests, and Marcus is WHIIIIIITE"
Holy frig it doesn't even mention what TIME the incident happened. It quotes Marcus as saying "It went from 4 till 10pm and later, getting progressively louder". If he was spraying water at 2am its substantially different than 9pm - especially if there's a law broken and police aren't helping.
I don't know why we tolerate this news media. Years after they started their ridiculously dishonest anti-Trump vendetta, no one has burned them to the ground etc.