His model assumed no refraction. Due to the lack of refraction, he had to bend the light. If the guy assumed refraction then he could have assumed it's what would bend the light to make the model accurate. The next step is testing refraction. There are plenty examples of objects further in the distance appearing larger than objects closer. Like windmills in the ocean for example. This is an example of the atmos creating a lens and magnifying. Because of the magnification, your visible angel appears slightly smaller compared to the magnification therefore cutting off the edges.
McNasty 0 points 8 months ago
His model assumed no refraction. Due to the lack of refraction, he had to bend the light. If the guy assumed refraction then he could have assumed it's what would bend the light to make the model accurate. The next step is testing refraction. There are plenty examples of objects further in the distance appearing larger than objects closer. Like windmills in the ocean for example. This is an example of the atmos creating a lens and magnifying. Because of the magnification, your visible angel appears slightly smaller compared to the magnification therefore cutting off the edges.
You're just to god damn jewish.