I read a couple thousand words of this, and my main problem with it so far is that it treats Marx and Freud as if they're legitimate thinkers who happen to have a flawed/harmful worldview, rather than as subversive kikes who were intentionally wrong to deceive the goyim and keep us controlled.
Does it really matter though, whether they are being subversive or legitimately believed these idealogies? Think of it this way, would it change the necessity to annhilate marxism, if the marxists were sincere rather than subversive?
It also assumes that leftist scientism
I didn't get that impression. Just the use of "scietism" rather than "science" indicated the opposite to me.
In any case, I'm glad someone besides me took the time to read and understand the work.
prototype 0 points 11 months ago
Does it really matter though, whether they are being subversive or legitimately believed these idealogies?
Think of it this way, would it change the necessity to annhilate marxism, if the marxists were sincere rather than subversive?
I didn't get that impression. Just the use of "scietism" rather than "science" indicated the opposite to me.
In any case, I'm glad someone besides me took the time to read and understand the work.