Atheist-cuckery is nihilism, nihilism breads nothing but death and destruction. Atheists gave us communism, critical theory(woke bullshit), slavery, usury, WEF heads are all atheist trans-humanists(tranny faggots). Atheism gave us transexual degeneracy, and the Weimar republic. Atheism has been responsible for the decline of every empire in history. Body positivity, feminism, and other delusions are atheist inventions. The most worthless human beings on this site are atheists, fat, insecure, full of hatred, delusional, project like an IMAX theatre. I guarantee you the vast majority of reddit mods are atheists.
Seeing what atheism leads to, I'd rather be a christ-cuck by wide margin, as wide as the waist of the atheists who will downvote this. Woke ideology gets no sales, no support from other atheist-cucks, because atheism cannot form cohesion like religion can.
No atheist can claim their philosophy can build anything worthwhile, because it can't. There isn't one single example of an atheist-cuck that made a meaningful contribution to humanity, meanwhile I can name dozens of people who believe(d) in God that DID have a meaningful impact on society.
The only prominent atheist-cucks amounted to little more than degenerates, mass murderers, or morons who did more harm than good.
Pure atheism says you're a product of your genes in an evolutionary world where your primary goal is to secure the survival of your offspring
That's Darwinism or, more accurately, evolutionary theory. Atheism makes larger claims about the nature of reality, i.e. there is no God/gods. Which, to me Ontological Argument and its kin aside, is just bonkers. Like, clearly you're ruled by at least the laws of nature - the universe is certainly akin to a god as far as any of us are concerned, and by thinking you should exist and belong in it, you're tacitly conforming to a worship of it. At the very least, Pantheism is where one should settle. But to make the claims that atheists make is... I can't describe it without being insulting. Or maybe... it's apathetic about the topic at best. But most of the time I find it's (like, invariably) arrogant, usually smug, and, in that vein, ignorant, stupid, and hostilely defensive. But the apathetic types I kinda get - big questions are easily ignored, particularly when they don't seem to affect your day-to-day.
If atheists carried their beliefs to their logical conclusion - they'd all just kill themselves and get it over with. I'm not trying to be inflammatory - I'm just saying that atheists don't believe there's anything beyond what's here now. They're wholehearted empiricists, embracing all of the shortcomings that that philosophy offers. So ultimately, this infinitesimally-small time one exists in the universe is entirely meaningless, and there's no afterlife to ponder what one did with this life, so what does it ultimately matter what good or bad happens in this life? On that note, there is no good or bad, right? Because it's all morally subjective at that point, since there's no higher truth than what is right here, right now.
I think it was NDGT (yup, black science man himself) that said something to the effect of: "Because there's nothing after this life, that makes our time here all the more important!" And, as usual, black science man opens his mouth and reveals the fool inside. "Because this is all ephemeral and there's no real meaning, that makes this all so much more meaningful!" Like what kinda fuckin dumbass statement...
Anyway clearly I think God must exist. I think it's beyond a Pantheistic God, but even that is "Almighty, Alpha/Omega, etc." relative to us, right? But before that there was the Word, the Logos, which is, to me, probably the best Almighty we can imagine, because it exists before the physical (and of course, alongside the physical). Hell, logic is why Math works; it's how we describe the physical. And I think humanity's unique ability to interact with that suggests that we have a special relationship with God relative to any other creature.
Choosing the right God has always been a toughy though, because all the texts have tough parts. But the Christian authors and disciples tend to be most palatable to me. Anyway, after having spent some time on the atheist side, then the agnostic side, I've come to realize that those two just can't be correct. I think many atheists actually believe it without knowing it as well, because it was edgy to be atheist like 30 years ago, now it's just chic and en vogue, but it's still cool. As people truly ponder the question I think it will fall out of style again (I mean, it's not like this is the first time in history people have denied the existence of God at scale).
InYourFaceNancyGrace -2 points 1.3 years ago
That's Darwinism or, more accurately, evolutionary theory. Atheism makes larger claims about the nature of reality, i.e. there is no God/gods. Which, to me Ontological Argument and its kin aside, is just bonkers. Like, clearly you're ruled by at least the laws of nature - the universe is certainly akin to a god as far as any of us are concerned, and by thinking you should exist and belong in it, you're tacitly conforming to a worship of it. At the very least, Pantheism is where one should settle. But to make the claims that atheists make is... I can't describe it without being insulting. Or maybe... it's apathetic about the topic at best. But most of the time I find it's (like, invariably) arrogant, usually smug, and, in that vein, ignorant, stupid, and hostilely defensive. But the apathetic types I kinda get - big questions are easily ignored, particularly when they don't seem to affect your day-to-day.
If atheists carried their beliefs to their logical conclusion - they'd all just kill themselves and get it over with. I'm not trying to be inflammatory - I'm just saying that atheists don't believe there's anything beyond what's here now. They're wholehearted empiricists, embracing all of the shortcomings that that philosophy offers. So ultimately, this infinitesimally-small time one exists in the universe is entirely meaningless, and there's no afterlife to ponder what one did with this life, so what does it ultimately matter what good or bad happens in this life? On that note, there is no good or bad, right? Because it's all morally subjective at that point, since there's no higher truth than what is right here, right now.
I think it was NDGT (yup, black science man himself) that said something to the effect of: "Because there's nothing after this life, that makes our time here all the more important!" And, as usual, black science man opens his mouth and reveals the fool inside. "Because this is all ephemeral and there's no real meaning, that makes this all so much more meaningful!" Like what kinda fuckin dumbass statement...
Anyway clearly I think God must exist. I think it's beyond a Pantheistic God, but even that is "Almighty, Alpha/Omega, etc." relative to us, right? But before that there was the Word, the Logos, which is, to me, probably the best Almighty we can imagine, because it exists before the physical (and of course, alongside the physical). Hell, logic is why Math works; it's how we describe the physical. And I think humanity's unique ability to interact with that suggests that we have a special relationship with God relative to any other creature.
Choosing the right God has always been a toughy though, because all the texts have tough parts. But the Christian authors and disciples tend to be most palatable to me. Anyway, after having spent some time on the atheist side, then the agnostic side, I've come to realize that those two just can't be correct. I think many atheists actually believe it without knowing it as well, because it was edgy to be atheist like 30 years ago, now it's just chic and en vogue, but it's still cool. As people truly ponder the question I think it will fall out of style again (I mean, it's not like this is the first time in history people have denied the existence of God at scale).