×
Login Register an account
Top Submissions Explore Upgoat Search Random Subverse Random Post Colorize! Site Rules
9
1 comments block

Ill say the same thing now ive been saying for 4 yearss.

Check the biosecurities laws in your country, which i think is where you will find the rules on EUAs. Theyre pretty much the same everywhere but almost always state that if there are possible treatments available then no emergency use agreement can be issued for an experimental treatment.

That headline, even one admission from any kind of qualified source like that one, pretty much invalidates the case for the EUAs, they must cease, and continuing would be in breech of the law.

The fact that they knew ivermectin worked exactly as intended before the jabs were ever rolled out means that the EUAs were illegal to begin with

The fact that there is a list of 1200+ side effects over 8 pages of expected adverse side effects dated before any EUA was issued means they knew the jabs would kill or damage a good percentage of people before hitting up governments for permission.

The fact they intended to hit 7 billion people with multiple doses of an experimental drug they knew absolutely the likelihood of adverse reactions/deaths means they did all the fucking numbers.

This was not attempted murder, mass murder, or even genocide.

This was an attempted mass extinction event

Knowingly