"But you do understand that in order for nuclear reactors to work, the physics behind them requires radiation to be real, don't you? They cannot work, unless there exist a material that spews out energetic particles with sufficient energy to produce the heat that makes nuclear fission possible.
The physics of fission is EXTREMELY well documented. It's not like vaccines or covid, where 90% of all documents are blacked out corporate secrets. We are talking fundamental level physics here.
And if you then concede these two things - 1) nuclear reactors exist, 2) the physics is well known and it works. Then from those two follows that nuclear explosions can occur, because if nuclear explosions could NOT occur, then the physics of fission would be incorrect, and nuclear reactors could not exist.
So which is it. You can't have both. Either nuclear reactors work, and therefore nuclear bombs are possible, or nuclear bombs do not exist, and therefore nuclear reactors cannot exist either."
Can't disagree, however, nobody is on that track of thought. Please recap: what are you arguing and who are you directing it too?
beece 0 points 1.3 years ago
Qwop said:
"But you do understand that in order for nuclear reactors to work, the physics behind them requires radiation to be real, don't you? They cannot work, unless there exist a material that spews out energetic particles with sufficient energy to produce the heat that makes nuclear fission possible.
The physics of fission is EXTREMELY well documented. It's not like vaccines or covid, where 90% of all documents are blacked out corporate secrets. We are talking fundamental level physics here.
And if you then concede these two things - 1) nuclear reactors exist, 2) the physics is well known and it works. Then from those two follows that nuclear explosions can occur, because if nuclear explosions could NOT occur, then the physics of fission would be incorrect, and nuclear reactors could not exist.
So which is it. You can't have both. Either nuclear reactors work, and therefore nuclear bombs are possible, or nuclear bombs do not exist, and therefore nuclear reactors cannot exist either."
Can't disagree, however, nobody is on that track of thought. Please recap: what are you arguing and who are you directing it too?