it enables them to walk all over you. they'd be still licking our heels just as they were before christianity, or non-existent, if it wasn't for you brainwashed cuckolds.
White people conquered the entire globe not christians.
What does this even mean? What is a white person? You're acting like only white people build civilized societies, that's simply not true. "White" people have never conquered the entire globe, you're just making stuff up. It also depends on what your definition of "success" is. Asians were building beautiful structures for thousands of years, even the pre-Christian pagan baby slaughtering Mexicans had good architecture. Plenty of beautiful architecture in the east.
You know what put a stop to all that insanity in Mexico and South America? Portugese and Spaniard Catholic conquerers. You could argue those people aren't even white in the strict sense. White is such a nebulous term, it lacks precision.
No other demographic however has conquered and colonized almost the entire globe except Christians; they just happen to be white in this case. That doesn't mean every other race is incapable of civilized living, you're taking what I'm saying out of context.
Blacks are obviously less intelligent, that's because of the curse of Ham. Christians have done a decent job of getting them out of grass huts, but there's still work to be done there. Christianity gives light to the intellect and lifted them up in a lot of ways out of some of the disgusting things they do; not all of them convert and continue the evil, disgusting practices, but that's not Christianity's fault. People have free will. Plenty of lazy-ass drug-addicted whites who act like animals too, it's not just blacks; however they're much worse generally speaking.
A pagan is anyone who doesn't follow a jew religion. For centuries White people didn't follow kike myths and made empires.
It's fine if you want to call the Greeks and Romans "white", but being "white" is not what made them successful. It was immaterial ideas coupled with military strength. The Babylonian Empire, Khan Empire and the Aztec Empire also conquered large swaths of land, they weren't white. The Han Dynasty united all of China in the 2nd century AD, they weren't white. Sheer militaristic power is not an example of success in goodness, it's merely an example of an exercise of power.
If you measure success merely by the exercise of conquering land and power then that's fine, but that's not how Christians have ever viewed it. Saving souls for God was the primary goal. That's what the Crusades and Conquest of the Americas was about.
Just because there was some successful Pagans in terms of worldly power doesn't make Paganism right or true. There are plenty of successful Jews, plenty of successful Satanists, plenty of Successful Hindus and other retarded religions. Worldly success is not the standard by which one defines what Truth is.
ArnoBreker 0 points 1.6 years ago
What does this even mean? What is a white person? You're acting like only white people build civilized societies, that's simply not true. "White" people have never conquered the entire globe, you're just making stuff up. It also depends on what your definition of "success" is. Asians were building beautiful structures for thousands of years, even the pre-Christian pagan baby slaughtering Mexicans had good architecture. Plenty of beautiful architecture in the east.
You know what put a stop to all that insanity in Mexico and South America? Portugese and Spaniard Catholic conquerers. You could argue those people aren't even white in the strict sense. White is such a nebulous term, it lacks precision.
No other demographic however has conquered and colonized almost the entire globe except Christians; they just happen to be white in this case. That doesn't mean every other race is incapable of civilized living, you're taking what I'm saying out of context.
Blacks are obviously less intelligent, that's because of the curse of Ham. Christians have done a decent job of getting them out of grass huts, but there's still work to be done there. Christianity gives light to the intellect and lifted them up in a lot of ways out of some of the disgusting things they do; not all of them convert and continue the evil, disgusting practices, but that's not Christianity's fault. People have free will. Plenty of lazy-ass drug-addicted whites who act like animals too, it's not just blacks; however they're much worse generally speaking.
It's fine if you want to call the Greeks and Romans "white", but being "white" is not what made them successful. It was immaterial ideas coupled with military strength. The Babylonian Empire, Khan Empire and the Aztec Empire also conquered large swaths of land, they weren't white. The Han Dynasty united all of China in the 2nd century AD, they weren't white. Sheer militaristic power is not an example of success in goodness, it's merely an example of an exercise of power.
If you measure success merely by the exercise of conquering land and power then that's fine, but that's not how Christians have ever viewed it. Saving souls for God was the primary goal. That's what the Crusades and Conquest of the Americas was about.
Just because there was some successful Pagans in terms of worldly power doesn't make Paganism right or true. There are plenty of successful Jews, plenty of successful Satanists, plenty of Successful Hindus and other retarded religions. Worldly success is not the standard by which one defines what Truth is.