- White people would be protesting the school's history curriculum because of how it was teaching hate.
- The holocaust, transatlantic slave trade, colonialism, every other historical claim that is trotted out to incite hatred towards whites.
- All of it is a set of conspiracy theories propagated by hate groups to stir up hatred towards white people.
- We talk about how unacceptable it is to spread hateful theories about white people in order to defame them.
- We demand that the curriculum be recalled and all mention of any event that could be used to justify violence against whites be banned
- Any truthfulness behind the claims is a sidestepped issue, the people and groups who popularize these events are hateful because they do so. Why would anyone mention anything about these events unless they were trying to incite violence against white people?
- "White people have been victimized for centuries!" proceeds to list off all the times when a nonwhite has done something to white people throughout history, the one-sided nature of this cherry-picked listing of events giving the impression that whites are history's victims
- We talk about ourselves being "strong and resilient" and being "people, just like you" in order to reduce the level of the discussion down to cold harsh cruelty vs warm babytalk sentimentality.
- We characterize the other side's position as being irrationally in favor of killing white people and denying them their human rights, they are just on the side of hate, nothing else.
- Basically, we watch and listen to what the jews say and we simply make some substitutions, then push our cause in the same way they do.
There exists no clearer a sign that someone is about to say something false than when they preface it with lines like "obviously", "clearly", "everybody knows", and "it's common knowledge".
In my experience, such statements generally indicate that they are either mistaken about what they speak of, and are mindlessly reciting the assumptions they've made in error, or they are lying and trying to use the bias of peer pressure or the shame of doubting what is clear as day to keep tem from discovering the lie and proceeding to expose it.
A lot of what most people find to be intuitively true from their experiences is false. One example: the idea that being in extreme cold could cause you to feel hot, and thus strip your clothes off to cool yourself in the snow is counter to most people's intuition, but it's true, and paradoxical undressing takes the lives of many inexperienced mountaineers.
The Bible says it clearly, that they ate of the fruit of the forbidden tree, "and their eyes were opened, knowing good from evil". I also believe it said that they "became as God" in this aspect.
This is later proven in that the way the God discovers what they had done is that he had seen them covering their nakedness, because they weren't doing that before they had eaten of the fruit.
Genesis itself tells us, in explicit terms, that God lied when he said that they would die on the day they ate of the forbidden fruit, and the serpent told the truth when he said that they would "become as God, knowing good from evil".
Crack it open and read the verses, right now. I'm operating from memory, but pretty sure I'm right about this.
So your own book refutes you.
Also, to be clear, I was speaking from the assumption given that the Christian canon and religion is true.
Paradoxical003 0 points 1.7 years ago
There exists no clearer a sign that someone is about to say something false than when they preface it with lines like "obviously", "clearly", "everybody knows", and "it's common knowledge".
In my experience, such statements generally indicate that they are either mistaken about what they speak of, and are mindlessly reciting the assumptions they've made in error, or they are lying and trying to use the bias of peer pressure or the shame of doubting what is clear as day to keep tem from discovering the lie and proceeding to expose it.
A lot of what most people find to be intuitively true from their experiences is false.
One example: the idea that being in extreme cold could cause you to feel hot, and thus strip your clothes off to cool yourself in the snow is counter to most people's intuition, but it's true, and paradoxical undressing takes the lives of many inexperienced mountaineers.
The Bible says it clearly, that they ate of the fruit of the forbidden tree, "and their eyes were opened, knowing good from evil". I also believe it said that they "became as God" in this aspect.
This is later proven in that the way the God discovers what they had done is that he had seen them covering their nakedness, because they weren't doing that before they had eaten of the fruit.
Genesis itself tells us, in explicit terms, that God lied when he said that they would die on the day they ate of the forbidden fruit, and the serpent told the truth when he said that they would "become as God, knowing good from evil".
Crack it open and read the verses, right now. I'm operating from memory, but pretty sure I'm right about this.
So your own book refutes you.
Also, to be clear, I was speaking from the assumption given that the Christian canon and religion is true.