×
Login Register an account
Top Submissions Explore Upgoat Search Random Subverse Random Post Colorize! Site Rules
2

How is German expansion different from zionism?

submitted by TheGreatWar to HitlerWasRight 2.2 yearsMar 22, 2022 19:11:17 ago (+3/-1)     (HitlerWasRight)

I'm about 200 pages into Mein Kampf and I find myself at a loss to grasp the difference between Zionism and the Pan-German sentiments espoused by Hitler. This is especially true since he makes the point that a nation is not a piece of land, but one race with one worldview. The Jew is also one race with one worldview. At the time they had no national land and were therefore easily regarded as parasites. But they now have a homeland to provide security and defense for their race. If the Jew is an eternal parasite then what use does it have for a homeland? If the Jew has a homeland then how can it be a parasite, and thus how can it be morally inferior to the German? Being a parasite is the main and perhaps only argument Hitler makes against the Jew. Is the Jew, now having realized some of its zionist dreams, on equal footing with the German?


17 comments block

It's not the means, but the ends that matters.
Not the actions, but the people who stand to benefit or suffer from them.
Get this through your head, good and evil are characteristics of genes, not actions, of it benefits the evolutionary interests of your genes, or harms those of their competitors, then the action is good.
If the reverse, then evil.
Everything we can condemn the jews for is made worthy of condemnation because our people are harmed by their actions, but jews are the ones who stand to gain from them.

I can't make this any simpler, theres your team, and there's the team which opposes your own.

Whatever gets points for your team is good, whatever loses points for your team is evil.

Their team opposes your own, therefore whatever points they get is as good grom your perspective as a point that your team has lost.