submitted by Rob3122 to HolocoughHoax 2.2 yearsJan 31, 2022 13:33:37 ago (+2/-1) (thehill.com)
Love240 1 points 2.2 years ago
On this page https://www.fda.gov/vaccines-blood-biologics/spikevax under Supporting Documents, I found this https://www.fda.gov/media/155815/downloadIt appears to reference a BLA submission that they have 'approved'. This says it is the same as the one approved for 'EUA'.https://www.fda.gov/news-events/press-announcements/coronavirus-covid-19-update-fda-takes-key-action-approving-second-covid-19-vaccineMy question is, how is it 'identical' to the 'EUA' injection, but that 'EUA' injection wasn't even available in the US? How then was it approved?
Love240 1 points 2.2 years ago
On this page https://www.fda.gov/vaccines-blood-biologics/spikevax under Supporting Documents, I found this https://www.fda.gov/media/155815/download
It appears to reference a BLA submission that they have 'approved'.
This says it is the same as the one approved for 'EUA'.
https://www.fda.gov/news-events/press-announcements/coronavirus-covid-19-update-fda-takes-key-action-approving-second-covid-19-vaccine
My question is, how is it 'identical' to the 'EUA' injection, but that 'EUA' injection wasn't even available in the US? How then was it approved?