"The Book of Matt" by Stephen Jimenez is an excellent piece of investigative journalism. Jimenez originally started with the story believing the narrative that Shepherd was killed by rednecks because he was homosexual. His book was roundly condemned by faggots who never read it but objected only because it painted a different and very unflattering picture of their dead faggot martyr.
You can always trust the left, and especially faggots, to lie when it's convenient for them. Nevertheless, one has to give credit to the journalist Jimenez. He is homosexual, yet the pursued the real story and told the truth regardless of the cost, receiving a tremendous backlash in the process.
Yes he is. But I was trying to elevate the tone to be somewhat more objective. In the article, it says he investigated the story because he thought it was true and wanted to know more about alleged "homophobia" in Laramie, Wyoming, and how this could happen. Yes, he's a big ol' cockgobbler, but to his credit, he found the truth and told the real story, in defiance of the narrative put forward by his narcissistic cockgobbling peers. I would imagine the backlash he received from faggots in the media like The Advocate likely opened his eyes.
HughBriss 0 points 2.4 years ago
Yes he is. But I was trying to elevate the tone to be somewhat more objective. In the article, it says he investigated the story because he thought it was true and wanted to know more about alleged "homophobia" in Laramie, Wyoming, and how this could happen. Yes, he's a big ol' cockgobbler, but to his credit, he found the truth and told the real story, in defiance of the narrative put forward by his narcissistic cockgobbling peers. I would imagine the backlash he received from faggots in the media like The Advocate likely opened his eyes.