Sign into an existing account

I've been following the trial somewhat closely and there are other ridiculous things that stand out if you're paying attention. Obviously none of these things will be covered by the (((media))), so I share some of my observations here for your edification:

- The prosecution is a bunch of nogunz faggots, unsurprisingly. But for a case as prominent as this, you'd think they'd do even the most basic research. The faggy ADA kept saying "strap" and "scope" over and over, which is one of the signs that someone doesn't know what they're talking about. Then the defense used the terms "sling" and "optic" and suddenly, the prosecution is now using those terms and nothing else.

- One of the arguments the defense made was that Kyle's life was in danger because jews were trying to grab his gun. I shit you not, the prosecution's response was to ask a witness if Kyle's gun "had a strap on it," then something along the lines of "If you grab a gun that has a strap on it, will it stay on your body? Yes? NO FURTHER QUESTIONS," implying that you can't lose control over a slinged weapon.

- The defense paraded the forensics tech yesterday before the jury, presenting the "findings" from the gun Kyle had. The defense submitted an image of one of the jews grabbing Kyle's rifle by the barrel... so the prosecution asked if the "barrel guard" (handguard) had any jew DNA on it. Of course, the answer was no. The defense asked if the barrel itself was tested for DNA. The answer was no. The prosecution tried to imply the handguard is the same as the barrel.

There's more, but those are some of the bigger points I recall off the top of my head. Feel free to ask about the case, if I can answer I will.