Don’t you just love big pharma”s concern for our health?
Thimerosal is a mercury-based preservative that has been used for decades in the United States in multi-dose vials (vials containing more than one dose) of medicines and vaccines. There is no evidence of harm caused by the low doses of thimerosal in vaccines, except for minor reactions like redness and swelling at the injection site. However, in July 1999, the Public Health Service agencies, the American Academy of Pediatrics, and vaccine manufacturers agreed that thimerosal should be reduced or eliminated in vaccines as a precautionary measure.
Yeah, you're answering very superficially. It isn't that simple. First off, a lot of those scientists and researchers had the first reports, the actual results of clinical trials and epedmiological reports regarding adverse reactions to the vaccines. The actual factual research. Most of them sacrificed their careers to get the information out, information might I add that was far more scientific than the findings report I had. Not all of them went to mainstream media, a lot went to alternative channels. But they all had something in common. Regardless of what evidence was produced, they were all ultimately dismissed.
Secondly, the initial reaction you had regarding my claims are so standard that even producing a document would generally just lead to claims of forgery. Even if I managed to convince anyone that the document was real, how far would that on its own go.
You're quick to assume that you know something I or others in the situation do not. Obviously you have not thought this through very long. Not that I blame you. I didn't need to until I was there. But I have.
Your flippant insinuation that I am incapable of deep thought and consideration of a complicated and maybe even dangerous situation speaks more about you than myself. I seriously doubt you could have come up with anything that I hadn't considered and dismissed as not viable.
But lets bring this closer to reality. What would you have done if you had received such information? Shitpost it? Make fliers? Hijack the NYT and have it printed in the next edition? Well? Lets see that manly brain of yours fire for 30 seconds +.
Metanoid 0 points 2.8 years ago
Yeah, you're answering very superficially. It isn't that simple. First off, a lot of those scientists and researchers had the first reports, the actual results of clinical trials and epedmiological reports regarding adverse reactions to the vaccines. The actual factual research. Most of them sacrificed their careers to get the information out, information might I add that was far more scientific than the findings report I had. Not all of them went to mainstream media, a lot went to alternative channels. But they all had something in common. Regardless of what evidence was produced, they were all ultimately dismissed.
Secondly, the initial reaction you had regarding my claims are so standard that even producing a document would generally just lead to claims of forgery. Even if I managed to convince anyone that the document was real, how far would that on its own go.
You're quick to assume that you know something I or others in the situation do not. Obviously you have not thought this through very long. Not that I blame you. I didn't need to until I was there. But I have.
Your flippant insinuation that I am incapable of deep thought and consideration of a complicated and maybe even dangerous situation speaks more about you than myself. I seriously doubt you could have come up with anything that I hadn't considered and dismissed as not viable.
But lets bring this closer to reality. What would you have done if you had received such information? Shitpost it? Make fliers? Hijack the NYT and have it printed in the next edition?
Well? Lets see that manly brain of yours fire for 30 seconds +.