Don't forget the original stomping ground of 'influence bots' (the name for weaponized chatbots) was arguing against people skeptical of vaccines on twitter: https://arxiv.org/abs/1601.05140
Also, don't forget the man who was banned from reddit for trapping the next generation of these influence bots: https://files.catbox.moe/42dskv.png
I've written at length about these topics before, so ask for more if interested.
-
I'm pretty sure I've argued with a number of these before, they subtly miss the point or miss the implicit portion of a statement, etc, or fixate on the wrong part of a post. The problem is that people do that too, and you can only tell when you have gone back and forth and realized you are making no headway; it is as if they cannot follow the thread.
I'm also pretty sure the user here, try (who also wen't by nil, oaf, and HRCisDONE), is one, though I personally don't mind as we need some bots of our own for balance.
aleleopathic 16 points 2.9 years ago
Don't forget the original stomping ground of 'influence bots' (the name for weaponized chatbots) was arguing against people skeptical of vaccines on twitter: https://arxiv.org/abs/1601.05140
Also, don't forget the man who was banned from reddit for trapping the next generation of these influence bots: https://files.catbox.moe/42dskv.png
I've written at length about these topics before, so ask for more if interested.
-
I'm pretty sure I've argued with a number of these before, they subtly miss the point or miss the implicit portion of a statement, etc, or fixate on the wrong part of a post. The problem is that people do that too, and you can only tell when you have gone back and forth and realized you are making no headway; it is as if they cannot follow the thread.
I'm also pretty sure the user here, try (who also wen't by nil, oaf, and HRCisDONE), is one, though I personally don't mind as we need some bots of our own for balance.