Kikes did not take complete control of the ideology of european elites.
beforehand....
I suppose you mean pre-christian? But that was not an ideal situation either. There was less dramatic racial mixiing with far flung populations like niggers or chinks or american indians but that was because of an inability to reach those places, not superior racial policies.
There were still a ton of racial mixing in europe in antiquity, they were just between ethnic groups with a smaller genetic distance between them.
For instance the Anglo-saxons invaded Britain and destroyed the Celtic establishment wherever they found it cuz “fuck celts” but we now know that they all took celtic wives and today the most “english” part of Britain is 3/4 descended from Roman era Britons (i.e. celts).
The Romans were originally a fair skinned light hair/eye tribe derived from Corded Ware ancesty. But they expanded their definition of Roman to such a great degree that it eventually included all kinds of middle easterners and north africans. “Yay, we’re the romans” but they eventually became shitskins.
Modern China is another good example of this. The Han ethnicity is not closely related at all. It includes all these low IQ southeast asian types but the government promotes a narrative of ethnic unity which serves their interest.
Elites will always want to expand their empires by including “foreign” subjects which they will pander to and claim unity with . Because it was less dramatic in ancient times because of limited travel distances doesn’t mean the problem didn’t exist.
All this shit happens to some extent whether kikes exist or not. White elites do this because they are greedier than they are prescient. White elites have happily collaborated with with jews because their interests are so similar. They are both parasites. Dont make the mistake of painting European elites as the victims
PostWallHelena 0 points 14 hours ago
Kikes did not take complete control of the ideology of european elites.
I suppose you mean pre-christian? But that was not an ideal situation either. There was less dramatic racial mixiing with far flung populations like niggers or chinks or american indians but that was because of an inability to reach those places, not superior racial policies.
There were still a ton of racial mixing in europe in antiquity, they were just between ethnic groups with a smaller genetic distance between them.
For instance the Anglo-saxons invaded Britain and destroyed the Celtic establishment wherever they found it cuz “fuck celts” but we now know that they all took celtic wives and today the most “english” part of Britain is 3/4 descended from Roman era Britons (i.e. celts).
The Romans were originally a fair skinned light hair/eye tribe derived from Corded Ware ancesty. But they expanded their definition of Roman to such a great degree that it eventually included all kinds of middle easterners and north africans. “Yay, we’re the romans” but they eventually became shitskins.
Modern China is another good example of this. The Han ethnicity is not closely related at all. It includes all these low IQ southeast asian types but the government promotes a narrative of ethnic unity which serves their interest.
Elites will always want to expand their empires by including “foreign” subjects which they will pander to and claim unity with . Because it was less dramatic in ancient times because of limited travel distances doesn’t mean the problem didn’t exist.
All this shit happens to some extent whether kikes exist or not. White elites do this because they are greedier than they are prescient. White elites have happily collaborated with with jews because their interests are so similar. They are both parasites. Dont make the mistake of painting European elites as the victims