Well at least the guy I replied to got it. Sheesh.
Videos of the smoldering bones of buildings burned entirely, from the ground up, still standing with firefighters in them because "structural engineers have said it's safe," and this guy asks if my "skyscrapers weren't built to withstand fire" comment is serious. Could be a young goat I guess; I expect too much out of goats sometimes.
But I recall plain as day watching the buildings come down and thinking "oh okay, they did a controlled demolition so the buildings would come down in their own footprint and not fall to one side or the other; I guess that's the smart thing considering the circumstance." I was watching with a group of friends and I think I even said out loud "That looks like controlled demolition."
But then the government assholes said they came down on their own? Because of FIRE? Like WTC 1&2 I could almost be sold - they got hit by a plane going top speed; that's basically like a missile impact. Then fire on top of that. But WTC 7? With a small fire on the top floor, and the entire building coming down uniformly? Literally unbelievable because of the evidence I posted. No 10+ story building constructed after 1950 would go full collapse because of a fire in one corner of the top floor. Even the Empire State Building took a plane impact in 1945, fire and all, and it's still standing.
One wonders how much longer the glaringly-obvious lies can continue to be propped up by "muh patriotism."
InYourFaceNancyGrace 1 points 1 day ago
Well at least the guy I replied to got it. Sheesh.
Videos of the smoldering bones of buildings burned entirely, from the ground up, still standing with firefighters in them because "structural engineers have said it's safe," and this guy asks if my "skyscrapers weren't built to withstand fire" comment is serious. Could be a young goat I guess; I expect too much out of goats sometimes.
But I recall plain as day watching the buildings come down and thinking "oh okay, they did a controlled demolition so the buildings would come down in their own footprint and not fall to one side or the other; I guess that's the smart thing considering the circumstance." I was watching with a group of friends and I think I even said out loud "That looks like controlled demolition."
But then the government assholes said they came down on their own? Because of FIRE? Like WTC 1&2 I could almost be sold - they got hit by a plane going top speed; that's basically like a missile impact. Then fire on top of that. But WTC 7? With a small fire on the top floor, and the entire building coming down uniformly? Literally unbelievable because of the evidence I posted. No 10+ story building constructed after 1950 would go full collapse because of a fire in one corner of the top floor. Even the Empire State Building took a plane impact in 1945, fire and all, and it's still standing.
One wonders how much longer the glaringly-obvious lies can continue to be propped up by "muh patriotism."